All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Today
  2. Salam alayqum, Mein nay yahi baat Mufi Ansar ul-Qadri Sahib say suneeh pasand aahi aur bayan kar deeh. Upar un ki taqreer ka link deeya heh ... agar is mein nah ho toh batayeh ga mein waqt nikal kar woh taqreer talash kar doon ga jis mein yeh baat heh.
  3. Yesterday
  4. Janab kidr Ghayb ho gay hen? Aap kay walayatoon kay faisleh karnay hen. Program: Kon Banay Ga Wali-Allah? kay aap judge hen ... aayeh fesla kar denh. Maqam e Walayat o rutba Ghawthi'at ka taaj pehna denh ya utarwa den ... abh toh aap nay walayat deni aur leni ki kursi par kabza jamaya heh ... aap hi banaen aur utar dalen ... Waliyoon kay maqam o martba ki rassi aap kay haath mein heh ... ham toh majboor hen aap ki ilmi liaqat ki waja say ... joh jissay denh gay hammen toh apko saqi e walayat samaj kar manneh kay paband ho gay hen. Charsi bhangi Sufiyoon ki mehfiloon mein bethen gay toh yahi kuch hoga. Aayeh aap ko Wali ki Shar'ri definition bata doon. Aap jesay Sufiyoon wali nahin, Shar'i. Wali-Allah woh heh, aur Awliyah-Allah hen, joh khaloos e dill say saum, salat, hajj, zakat, aur kalma shahadat kay paband hen. Aur joh Islam ki khatir aur Islam kay farogh ki khatir dil jaan say lartay, martay, jeetay, likhtay, rupaya pesa waqt aulad jaan kharch kartay hen. Joh dosti Allah ki raza wasteh. Joh dushmani Allah ki raza wasteh. Joh muhabbat e Rasool mein gustakhoon say qatta talluqi kar letay hen cha-hay woh apna, ghayr, beta, beti, maanh, baap, rishtaydar, dost yaar, sab kuch chor detay hen. Yeh Allah kay Wali ki nisha-niyan hen. Jis mein yeh sab hoon woh WALI E KAMIL heh aur agar sahib e silsila ho toh MURSHID E KAMIL heh. Aur agar yeh sifaat kissi mein nah hoon; aur hawa mein urta ho, murday zinda karta ho, dilloon kay raaz bata deta ho, jinnat us kay tabeh hoon, pathar ko sona aur sonay ko pathar bana deta ho, us kay kehnay say banj aurat bacha janay, urtay fighter jet ko ungli say pistol ka nishana bana kar moon say fire karay aur fighter jet taba ho jahay, lakh aur kuch kar leh, wali e kamil nahin balkay yeh bi zeroori nahin kay woh Musalman ho. Itna kar kay woh Dajjal ki tara Kafir, Ibn Say'yad, sabiq Yahoodi, ki tara dil ki baat janay wala ho sakta heh Wali e Kamil nahin. Rahi abh baat Karamat e Awliyah ki. Har kamil wali Sahib e karamat nahin aur har 'karamat type' karnay wala Awliyah-Allah mein say nahin. Awliyah-Allah kay darjay hen. Aik darja joh Sahib e Karamat nahin, dosra Sahib e karamat ka. Joh mein nay upar bayan keenh hen agar kissi mein hoon woh Wali e Kamil heh. Aur jis mein upar wali sab nishaniyan hoon aur Sahib e karamat bi ho toh woh martbay mein buland heh. Aatay hen Sayyidi Ala Hadhrat, Imam, Mujtahid, Mujadid, Faqih, Muhaddith, Mufassir, kay martba walayat ki taraf. Itna toh tummen bi shak nah hoga kay woh darja ula mein Wali e Kamil thay. Darja thaani'a yehni Sahib e Karamaat thay ya nahin? Is say teri jesi chawal ko kia laga. Magr phir bi Awliyah-Allah aur Ulamah nay Sayyidi Ala Hadhrat (rahimullah) ko zamanay ka GHAWTH mana heh aur un ki karamaat ka bayan teray jesay a'du-allah kay samnay bhansuri bajanay kay mutaradif heh. Ahle Sunnat kay Ulamah karamat e Ala Hadhrat (rahimullah) ka biyaan kartay ahay hen. Teray dill mein sirf bughz Ala Hadhrat (rahimullah) nay jaga bana leeh heh aur woh bi is waja say kay unoon nay Abu Talib ko Kafir aur Kufr par mawt ka likha. Aur janta aur manta tooh bi heh kay Sayyidi Ala Hadhrat (rahimullah) Wali e Kamil aur Sahib e Karamaat Awliyah-Allah mein say thay magr keun kay bad-bakht heh is waja say bughz e wali ko dil mein jaga deh kar likh raha heh. Allah kay aik wali say teri jang, dekh leeh, sab waliyoon kay khilaaf jang ban chuki heh aur tujjay samaj bi nahin kesay aur keun. Meri pichli post ko parh lena samaj ajahay gi kesay.
  5. Last week
  6. Hazrat Ayat Tatheer Hazrat Aishan Siddiqa R.a Ki shan me hai is ke mutaliq koi jawab likhe
  7. Awliyah-Allah khata Ijtihadi aur gunnah sagheera aur la-ilmi mein kabeera say bi masoom nahin magr sazza aur aag say mafooz hen. Wesay mujjay yeh bata Shaykh Abdul Qadir al-Jilani (rahimullah) al-maroof Ghawth al-Azam wali e kamil thay ya nahin? Thay! Kia Khawaja Baha al-Din Naqshband (rahimullah) Wali e kamil thay ya nahin? Thay! Abh bata donoon mein aik Hanafi Madhab aur dosray Hanbali Madhab par thay. Aur agar ziyada kichri banani heh apnay damagh ki toh Shaykh Farid al-Din Attar (rahimullah) al-maroof Ganj-Shakr ko jama kar leh is mein aur apnay is asool kay mutabiq bata kay kon Wali thah aur kon nahin: "... kyunke wali Allah k zubaan se galat baat nahi nikalsakti kyunke wali Allah ke hifz o amaan me hote hain ..." Ghalat baat nahin nikal sakti ... sirf zuban hee hifz o amaan mein hoti heh ya amal bi? Agar amal bi toh phir bata kay in teenoon mein Hanafi ashab wali e kamil nahin ya Shaykh Abdul Qadir al-Jilani (rahimullah)? Abh agar tooh ghalti say keh deh kay ashab Ahnaf Awliyah-Allah mein nahin keun kay un ki zuban bi hifz o amaan mein nahin thee keun kay unoon nay logoon ko Madhab Ahnaf kay mutabiq fiqh ki taleem deeh aur amal keeya toh tum yeh mantay ho kay fiqha Ahnaf ghalat heh. Phir khud Hanafi keun ko. Aur kia Imam Abu Hanifah (rahimullah) bi wali nahin thay? Sirf Maulvi thay? Jab tooh nay in kay darja walayat ka fesla kar deeya toh Ala Hadhrat (rahimullah) ki walayat ka fesla kar leh ga.
  8. Study Of The Word Ummah To Understand; “… the Last Hour will not come until … tribes of my Ummah worship idols.” Introduction: The Wahhabiyah hold to the opinion; Muslim Ummah can fall into major Shirk before the blowing of the wind and Muslims have fallen into major Shirk. To substantiate their position the Wahhabiyyah generally argue the words “… min ummati …” (i.e. my Ummah) refer to the Muslims in the hadith of: “ … and the Last Hour will not come before the tribes of my Ummah attach themselves to the polytheists and tribes of my Ummah worship idol …” [Ref: Abu Dawood, B30, H4239] On the opposite side, the creed of Ahle Sunnat is; Muslim Ummah of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) cannot fall into major Shirk. Ahle Sunnat’s understanding of the hadith used by Wahhabiyyah is that it refers to a time after blowing of wind. This wind will take the life of all Muslims leaving behind the disbelievers who then on inciting of shaytan would worship idols of al-Lat, al-Uzza as well as Dhil al Khalasa. Therefore the words ”… my Ummah …” are not about Muslims but about Arab disbelievers who would survive the blowing of wind. Various Meanings In Which Word Ummah Was Used In Quran: The word Ummah has been used in four different meanings; to mean religion: “Truly! This ummatuqum (i.e. your religion) is ummatun wahida (i.e. one religion), and I am your Lord, therefore worship Me (alone).” [Ref: 21:92] Used for Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) in meaning of leader/Imam. And implied that he is someone who embodies all the qualities of a righteous Ummah: ”Verily, Ibrahim was an Ummah (i.e. leader) obedient to Allah, Hanifa and he was not one of those who were Al-Mushrikun.” [Ref: 16:120] To mean a period of time i.e. term: “And if We delay the torment for them till a determined term (i.e. Ummah), they are sure to say, "What keeps it back?" [Ref: 11:8] And in another place Ummah is used as a group: “And when he arrived at the water of Madyan (Midian) he found there a Ummah (i.e. group) of men watering (their flocks) …” [Ref: 28:23] Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) states Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) has been sent to a community, a nation (i.e. Ummatin) like of which have been in past: “Thus have We sent you to a Ummah before whom other communities have passed away, …”[1] [Ref: 13:30] The reason for sending him is given:”… in order that you might recite unto them what We have revealed to you, …”[Ref: 13:30] To teach Mushrik Ummah One-ness of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) because they disbelieve in Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala)’: “… while they disbelieve in the Most Gracious (i.e. Allah).” and to teach them that worship is for Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) alone: “Say: "None has the right to be worshipped but He! In Him is my trust, and to Him will be my return with repentance." [Ref: 13:30] This establishes; in the verse Arab Mushrikeen were adressed as a Ummah to whom Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) was sent to guide to religion of Islam. Word Ummah’s plural Umam (i.e. communities, nations) is used for different kind of living creatures and birds in the verse: “There is not a moving (living) creature on earth, nor a bird that flies with its two wings, but are communities like you.[2] We have neglected nothing in the Book, then unto their Lord they (all) shall be gathered.” [Ref: 6:38] This establishes a Ummah is not necceserialy human but can be comprimised of none human living creatures and birds. The Conclusion On Usage Of Word Ummah: al-Hasil the word Ummah can be used in many different meanings and it is is that word Ummah is not always used in meaning of believing Ummah. It is established that word Ummah has been used in five meanings; for a righteous man, group of people, period of time, and to mean religion. It is established that the use of word Ummah for someone itself does not nessiciate belief in Islam but contextual evidence determines if it is used for believing nation, or disbelieving nation, or even if it is used for humans. Collapsing Of Earth In Arabia Usage Of Word Ummah To Mean Arabs: Collapsing of land is one of the ten major signs before the establishing of judgment day. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) prophecised about three such sinkings out of which one will take place in Arabian peninsula:“… the beast of the earth, and three collapses of the earth: A collapse in the east, a collapse in the west and a collapse in the 'Arabian peninsula. And a fire that comes out of a place within 'Adan, driving the people, or gathering the people, camping where they camp, and resting where they rest."' [Ref: Tirmadhi, Vol4, B7, H2183] This is confirmed by another Hadith: “… one in the west and one in the Arabian Peninsula; and fire that will emerge from the plain of Aden Abyan and ...." [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol1, B36, H4055] Refering to the one which will take place in Arabian peninsula Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “… 'In this Ummah' or: 'In my Ummah'" - the doubt was his - "a collapse of the earth, or a transformation, or stones shall rain upon the people of Al-Qadr.'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, Vol4, B6, H2152] The uncertainity of wording is cleared in other Hadith: “At the last [period] of my Ummah there will be the earth collapsing, transformations, and Qadhf.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol1, B36, H4060] and same is stated in another hadith: "There will be a collapse of the earth and transformation in my Ummah, and that is for those who deny Al-Qadar." [Ref: Tirmadhi, Vol 4, B6, H2153] Important point to note; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is Arab hence his use of words; “… in my nation …” in the light of evidence would imply in Arab nation there will be sinking of land and transformation [of humans into animals].[3] This is strenthened by the evidence of Hadith which indicate the sinking of land is to take place in Arabian Peninsula. This helps to conclude that in some, and in following Hadith, Ahadith words my Ummah have been used in general sense of my nation and not in Muslim Ummah: "There will be a collapse of the earth and transformation in my Ummah, and that is for those who deny Al-Qadar." If for the sake of argument it is conceded the words “… my Ummah …” were used to mean “… my (Muslim) nation …” even then the use would be for Arab Muslim nation. This use cannot legitimately stretched to include none Arab Muslims because the evidence points to the sinking of land taking place in Arabian Peninsula. Evidence Proves Arab Tribes Would Worship Idol-Gods: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) stated: “... "The Hour shall not be established until tribes of my Ummah unite with the idolaters, and until they worship idols. And indeed there shall be thirty imposters in my Ummah,each of them claiming that he is a Prophet. And I am the last of the Prophets, there is no Prophet after me." [Ref: Tirmadhi, B7, H2219] Another version has the words: “… and the Last Hour will not come before the tribes of my Ummah attach themselves to the polytheists and tribes of my Ummah worship idols. There will be among my people thirty great liars ..." [Ref: Abu Dawood, B30, H4239] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) foretold which tribe would worship idols and which specific idol would be worshipped: “... the women of the tribe of Daus would be seen going round Dhi al-Khalasa (for worship) and ..." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6944] Another version of this Hadith adds detail: “... Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established till the buttocks of the women of the tribe of Daus move while going round Dhi-al-Khalasa." Dhi-al-Khalasa was the idol of the Daus tribe which they used to worship in the Pre Islamic Period of ignorance.” [Ref: Bukhari, B88, H232] Other Ahadith also points to worship of al-Lat and al-Uzza in Arabian Peninsula: “The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] There is no explicit reference to which tribe would worship these two idol-gods but implicit evidence available from which it can be deduced. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them. And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] Now if we fallow the narrative and draw conclusions at each stage then it will mean Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) has stated Arabian tribes, in other words Arabian Ummah would worship idols of al-Lat, al-Uzza and Dhil al-Khilasah.[4] Tieing Up The Loose Ends Of Subject Matter: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) stated that a fragrant wind will blow; because of it all those with mustard grain worth of Eman in their hearts will die and those will survive they will have no goodness in them. These survivors then would revert to the religion of their forefathers. This means; all the suriving Arab nation, or in other words; all the Arabian tribes would revert to polytheistic religion of their fore-fathers. As part of this degeneration all the survivors would worship al-Lat, and al-Uzza with exception to Banu Daus who would worship their patron idol-god Dhil al-Khalasa. This establishes that the words; min ummati, have been used in linguistic sense of nation and specificly Arab nation and not in sense of; my Muslim Ummah. The all important question is: Where is the proof they will be Kafir Arabs? Answer to this important question is in the following two sections. Non-Muslim Arabian Tribes Would Worship Idols: It has been established the phrase; “… the tribes of my Ummah ...” means; the last hour would not come before the tribes of my Arab nation attach themselves to polytheists and tribes of my Arab nation worship idols. It is yet to be seen whether this phrase was used to mean; the last hour would not come before the tribes of my Arab Muslim Ummah attach themselves to the polytheists and tribes of my Arab Muslim Ummah worship idols. With regards to this; the position of Ahle Sunnat is that all the non-Muslim Arabs who would survive the blowing of wind in totality. Or in other words, all those non-Muslim Arabian tribes who will survive the blowing of wind will attach themselves to religion of their fore-fathers and worship idols. This can only be correct if the words; min ummati, have been used in linguistic sense in the following Hadith: “… and the Last Hour will not come before the tribes of my Ummah attach themselves to the polytheists and tribes of my Ummah worship idols." [Ref: Abu Dawood, B30, H4239] And to establish the position of Ahle Sunnat convincingly and to remove any possible doubts it has to be proven; those who would revert to idolatory will be disbelievers and not Muslims. Hadith Of Aysha Establishes: Wind Will Cause Death Of Every Muslim: Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) when she heard Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) say: “The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza.” She quoted the verse: "He it is Who has sent His Messenger with right guidance, and true religion, so that He may cause it to prevail upon all religions, though the polytheists are averse (to it)." and presented her understanding: “It implies that is going to be fulfilled.” Indicating that in her understanding the content of the verse is a Prophesy which will be fulfilled in future. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) replied: “It would happen as Allah would like.” Meaning the religion of Islam will dominate all religions and subjugate the Mushrikeen with rule of Islam as much as Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) wills: “Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] Another Hadith describes what the wind will do to the Muslims and describes the qualities of those who would survive: “... (but) it will cause the death of all (faithful) persons, not leaving behind a single person with an iota of faith in his heart. Then only the worst of men will remain to be overwhelmed by the Hour. ” [Ref: Muslim, B20, H4721] Another hadith records unique information about the purpose of wind and those who would survive the blowing of wind: “… and at that time Allah would send a pleasant wind which would soothe (people) even under their armpits, and would take the life of every Muslim and only the wicked would survive who would commit adultery like asses and the Last Hour would come to them.” [Ref: Muslim, B041, H7015] Another Hadith indicates that every Muslim, every Momin would die: “… and at that time Allah will send a pleasant wind which will soothe people even under their armpits, and will take the life of every Muslim and Momin (i.e. true believer), and only the wicked will survive. They will commit adultery in public like asses and the Resurrection Day will be held.'' [Ref: Riyadh al-Saliheen, B19, H1808] This proves after all the Muslims die and natural conclusion is only the disbelievers will remain alive. Further Explanation Of Hadith Of Hadhrat Aysha: Please note we began with explaining the Hadith-6945 and I will continue. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said after death [of every Muslim and every Momin] the remaining will have no goodness in them: “Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] And in other Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) explained why he said they will have no goodness in them: “… and only the wicked would survive who would commit adultery like asses and the Last Hour would come to them.” [Ref: Muslim, B20, H4721] And then Prophet (salallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) informed Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha) that people [with no goodness and who ill have intercouse like donkeys i.e. in public] would revert to relition of their fore-fathers: “Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them. And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] But before the trumpet is blown upon the surviving disbelieving Arabs; Satan would visit them in human form and command them to worship idols: “And he would command them to worship the idols, but in spite of this, they would have abundance of sustenance and lead comfortable lives. Then the trumpet ...” [Ref: Muslim B 41, H 7023] The survivors would be lacking goodness, indication of which is the moral decay; their having sexual intercourse openly like donkeys, with no sense and understanding of shame. And in this context the encouragment from Satan would be sufficent to misguide these disbelievers into polytheism. As a result all the Arab disbelievers who survived the Muslims would revert to the religion of their forefathers: “And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers." [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] Out of which only the disbelieving tribe of Banu Daus would worship their patron idol-god Dhi al-Khalasa: “The Last Hour would not come until the women of the tribe of Daus would be seen going round Dhi al-Khalasa (for worship) and …” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6944] All other disbelieving tribes of Arabian Peninsula who would succeed the Muslims would revert to worship of al-Lat and al-Uzza: “The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] Conclusion: In the Ahadith of discussion the words, my Ummah, have been used in linsguistic sense to mean; my Arab nation and not in meaning of; my Muslim Ummah. This understanding is based on three important facts: a) Word Ummah is not always used to refer to Muslim nation instead it also has been used in lingusitic sense. The words, my Ummah, have been used to refer to the actions of Arabs. c) And finally the strongest proof that words, my Ummah, cannot be used to mean Muslims in the Hadith under discussion is; the events would take place after all the Muslims have died. Therefore it would be foolish and heretical to believe contrary to what evidence of Quran and Hadith establishes. And it would be extremely devious to apply the Ahadith of al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Dhil al-Khilasah worship upon Muslims after evidence has been established against this understanding. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi Footnotes: - [1] Meaning of it is; sent you, O Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) to a disbelieving Arab Ummah like of which other Umaam have passed into history. - [2] Question is in which they are Umam like Ummah of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam)? Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) states: “Do they seek other than the religion of Allah while to Him submitted all creatures in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly. And to Him shall they all be returned.” [Ref: 3:83] “The seven heavens and the earth and all that is therein, glorify Him and there is not a thing but glorifies His Praise.” [Ref: 17:44] This establishes; all creatures and things, including believers, worship Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and all types of birds, animals are believers in Tawheed of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) therefore worship Him. - [3] One may argue; the words of Hadith are, ‘There will be a collapse of the earth and transformation in my Ummah, and …’ And Hadith does not explicitly state, in Arab nation, therefore the Hadith has been distorted to support a specific interpretation. Response to this allegation would be: The text of Hadith has not been distorted rather the actual meaning of Hadith is established with clear evidence. The justification for this understanding is; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is Arab, his nation is Arab, and land sinking will be in Arabia, therefore its only appropriate to interpret “… my …” in “… in my nation …” to mean; in my Arab nation. - [4] My investigation has revealed that all the Arab nation of Arabian peninsula, in other words, all the tribes of Arabian peninsula will fall into idolatory after the blowing of wind and it is not to believe as Wahhabi’s believe; some tribes of Arabian peninsula will worship idols. Note where ever I have written about some tribes worshipping idols it was in perspective of Wahhabi belief. If I recall correctly I have in every place attributed the belief of; some tribes worshiping idols, to Wahhabi’s but by chance if I have not and it is presented as my own belief then consider it my mistake from which I retracted. ------------------------------------------- Formatting And Content Improved.
  9. Martba mujadid aur mujtahid say kohi buland heh? Mujtahid ka matlab pata kia heh aur darjoon ka bi kuch pata heh ... wesay sufiyoon ki tara chars peeh kar behosh nah ho. Aur yeh baat mein nay nahin Mufti Ansar ul-Qadri Sahib nay keeh hen mein naqil hoon: Agar Sahib e Ilm hazraat ki qurbat hasil hoti toh mujjay batana nah parta magar chawal Sufiyon ka saath heh is waja say kuch pata nahin. Agar is mein nah millay toh batana mein in ki takreer nikaal doon ga.
  10. "Meh is baat ka qail hoon kay Sayyidi Ala Hazrat say leh ker Imam Mahdi (rahimullah alayhi ta'ala) kee pedaish taq kay arsay aur nuzul e Isa (alayhis salam), walay darmiyani arsay meh Ala Hazrat kee nazeer nah hoga. Taba Tabiyeen aur char Imamoon ko chor ker pedaish e Ala Hazrat taq, Sayyidi Ala Hazrat ka ilmi midaan meh kohi madd e muqabil nahin." Lahaula wa laquwwat... aisi jaahilaaana aqeedat se Allah hum sabko bachaye. Taba tabayeen (jinka zamaana mushkil se 250 hijri tak gaya hoga)... aur chaaron imamom ko chor kar ye neeche diye gaye naam hain... kya inse bhi badhkar Aala hazrath ko maante ho?? Ye aise azeem o shaan hastiyaan hain Aala hazrath khud jinke qadmon ki dhool maante honge apne aapko.. 1. Ghaus e azam Shaikh Sayyid Abdul Qaadir Jilaani r.a (470 -561 AH) jinke nazar e karam se hue auliya ke ilm ki shuruwaat hi wahan se hoti hai jahan pe faazil e bareily ya aur moulviyon ka ilm jahan khatam hota hai. Sarkaar ghaus e paak ko nabi kareem s.a.w.s aur Moula Ali a.s ne apna apna luaab e dahan se nawaaza hai.. aur aap kehte ho ke Ahmed Raza Khan ka ilm inse aala hai. Lahaula wa laquawwat. 2. Imam Ghazali (450 - 505H). 3. Imam al-Bayhaqi (384 - 458H) 4. sayyid-ut taifa Hazrath Junayd al-Baghdadi (d. 298H) 5. Imam Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (773 - 852 H) 6. Shah Bahauddin Naqshband (717 - 791H) 7. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (543 - 606H) 8. Khwaja Ghareeb nawaz Moinuddin chisti r.a (536 H) 9. Baba Fariduddin Ganjshakar r.a. (584H) Aala Hazrath ek aalim e deen, faazil aur aashiq e rasool the.. inka hum tahe dil se adab karte hain.. lekin inko is mansab pe nahin pahunchaate ke inko wali samajh baithe.. kyunke wali Allah k zubaan se galat baat nahi nikalsakti kyunke wali Allah ke hifz o amaan me hote hain.. jabke aalim e deen se tahqeeq me galati hosakti hai jiske liye unhe gunahgaar nahi kaha jasakta. Aisi hi ek galati Aala Hazrath ne zameen ko saakin aur suraj chaand ko iske atraaf ghoomta hua likh ke ki hai.. Aur iske liye hum Ahmed Raza Khan Faazil e bareili ki hi kitaabon mein jo hawaale diye hain unhi ko lete hain. Ahmed Raza Khan Faazil e bareili ne in aayaat(jinka tarjuma neeche diya hai reference ke saath) pe apna falsafa qayam kiya hai: The movement of the sun and moon is according to a course (Surah Rahman, verse 5). The sun and the moon are sailing within a circle (Surah Yasin, verse 40). The moon and the sun were besieged for you, which are constantly moving (Surah Ibrahim, verse 33). (For details please refer to "Nuzool-e-Ayat-e-Furqaan Besukoon-e-Zameen-o-Asman" of Alahazrat written in 1339 A.H., published from Raza Academy, Bombay). Ab in aayaat se kahin bhi ye saabit "nahi" hota ke suraj aur chand zameen ke atraaf ghoomte hain. Lekin faazil e bareili ne inka matlab ye nikaala ke zameen saakin hai aur suraj aur chand uske atraaf ghoomte hain. Jadeed science, space exploration, satellite images se aaj ye saabit ho chuka hai ke faazil e bareili galat the is tehqeek mein... jaisa ke moulviyon se galati hosakti hai kyunke na hi inki zubaan aur na hi inke haath aur qalam Allah azzawajall ki hifaazat me hote hain.. ye aijaaz to sirf auliya allah ko haasil hota hai ke wo jo bhi kehte hain ya likhte hain Allah ki taraf se hota hai aur wo kabhi galat nahi hota. Faazil e bareili hi ki ek aur kitaab - "Fauz-e-Mubin Dar Radd-e-Harkat-e-Zamin" hai jisme deegar logical examples ke zariye unhone zameen ko saakin prove karni ki koshish ki hai. Inke examples se ye saaf taur pe saabit hota hai ke unhe relative motion, physics aur logical conclusion etc. ka ilm nahi tha. Aur jo examples unhone diye hain wo bade asaani se radd kiye jaasakte hain ek school ya college student se bhi. Inhone relative motion ko bina samjhe 4-5 examples likhe daale daleel ke taur pe jo ke asal me ek hi concept pe 4-5 examples hain. Aaj isi relative motion ke basis pe satellite bheje gaye hain aasmaan me jinke zariye phone calls etc horahe hain. Ye examples aap yahan pe padhsakte - http://sunnirazvi.net/library/booklets/scientist.htm
  11. bhai ya bayan sun looo insha allah sub ko sub kuch samj ma a jai ga
  12. Bhaiyon.. mere kuch simple sawaal hai is topic mein... jinse jawaab khud ba khud ayaan hojayega ahle aql ko. 1. Aala hazrath ne Hazrath Abu taalib ko kaafir maana aur likha bhi. 2. Aala hazrath ke ustaad Hz Abu Taalib ko musalmaan maane 3. Ahle sunnah ke nazdeek ek maqbool fatwa (shayad Fatawa Alamgir me ya Fatawa Razviyya me hai) hai ke jo kaafir ko kaafir na maane, wo khud bhi kaafir hojaata hai In ilmi nuqton se ye mere neeche sawaal hain.. a. To kya Aala hazrat ke ustaad jinhone Abu Talib ko kaafir nahin maana wo khud kaafir hogaye (mazallah..)? b. To phir kya Alaa hazrat ne kaafir se ilm haasil kiya? c. Aur Alaa hazrat ka un deegar ulema e ahle sunnah aur auliya ke baare me kya fatwa hai jinhone Abu Talib ko ahle imaan maana? d. Kya kaafir se ahadith ki riwayath li jasktri hai? To phir ahadith ke kitaabom me Abu Talib se riwayath ahadith kyun hain? e. Hz Abdul Mutallib imaanwale the ya nahin? Hz Abu Talib agar Hz Abdul Mutallib ke hi deen pe hain to ahle imaan kyun na huye.. jabke imaan ke liye qubooliyat e nubuwat ko hz Abu Talib pehle hi qubool kar chuke the.. ye kehkar ke Aaqa kareem s.a.w.s ne kabhi jhoot nahi kahe aur aaqa pe naat shareef bhi to Abu Taalib hi ne padhi thi... f. Imaan ka connection dil se hai ya zubaan se? g. Kya imaan ke liye zubaan se iqraar zaroori hai? To phir kya har goonge insaan ko kaafir hi maana jayega?
  13. Earlier
  14. Yeh naat Ala Hazart ki hy . lakin maqta Dagh Dehlvi ka hy . jo mery ilam mn hy ya jo mn ny suna hy . Wo kuch yun hy k Ala hazara k bhai dagh delvi sy mily to un ko ala hazrat ka kalam sunaya to un ko boht masand aya unhon ny pocha kis ka kalam hy tow unhon ny bataya k mery bhai ka hy tow dagh ny kaha ab jb un ny milo tow koi naya kalam ly k ana . Ala Hazarat (R.A) sy un k bhai ki mulaqat hui tow un ko yeh bat yad na rahi aur jb wapis janay lagy train ki ticket ly li gari mn batain sy kuch dair qabl Dagh delvi ki bat yad ai k unhon ny naye kalam ki farmish ki thi . tow unhon ny Ala hazarat (R.A) ko bataya tow unhon ny kaha kagaz pencile ly k ao abi likh dety hain naya kalam tow train chaly sy pehly pehly jo kalam likha gaye tha wo Dagh Delvi ki sunaya tow unhain boht pasand aya tow unhon ny kaha kalam tow boht acha hy lakin is ka maqta nahi hy to Ala Hazrat k bhai ny kaha jaldi mn kalam likha hy tow train chal gai tow Maqta reh gaye phr Dagh Delvi ny is ka maqta likha aur kaha ab yeh hi is ka Maqta ho ga . "Mulke Sikhan ki shahi Tum ko Raza Musallam Jis Simt Aagaye Ho Sikhe Bithaa Diyee hain "" Likhny mn ya batane mn koi Ghalti hui ho tow mafi ka talabghar hun . Yeh waqia mn ny Raza Saqib ki zubani suna hy . Sukriyaa
  15. Hazrat Wo Jawab Tafseel Se Nahi Diya Hua Hai
  16. Hazrat Khalil Rana Sahab se Mohaddabana Guzarish Hai Hum Kam Ilm ko Iska Jawab Dekar Sawab Daren Hasil Karen
  17. Explanation Of Prophetic Saying: "Satan Lost All Hopes That The Worshippers Would Ever Worship Him ..." Introduction: Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) is reported to have said that Satan has given up hope that Muslims of Arabian Peninsula would ever worship him. There are numbers of interpretations of this statement and this article would focus on one understanding and point out the implications it has for belief and practice of Muslims. And then point out how it effects those who believe contrary to the teaching of Hadith. Hadith Of Satan Has Lost All Hope Of Being Worshipped: "Jabir reported: I heard Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship him in the Peninsula of Arabia, but he (is hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst them." [Ref: Muslim, B39, H6752] A Way Of Taking Lord Beside Allah: Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala) states Jews took their Rabbinical priests as Lords besides Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala): "They take their (Christian) priests and their (Jewish) Rabbaniyah to be their Lords against Allah, and Christ the son of Mary; yet they were commanded to worship none but One Allah. there is no god but He. Praise and glory to Him: (Far is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him)." [Ref: 9:31] The classical commentators of Quran have explained the Jews taking their Rabbis as Lords is in meaning of Jewish obedience of Rabbis with regards to the Halal which their Rabbis declared Haram, and Haram which the Rabbis declared Halal: "They have taken their rabbis, the scholars among the Jews, and their monks, the devout among the Christians, as lords beside God — following them in making lawful what God has made unlawful and making unlawful what He has made lawful — and the Messiah, son of Mary, when they were not commanded, in the Torah and the Gospel, except to worship One God: there is no god except Him; glory be to Him, as an affirmation of His transcendence (high), above what they associate (with Him)." [Ref: 9:31, Tafsir al-Jalalayn] "(They have taken as lords beside Allah) i.e. they obeyed them in acts of disobedience (their rabbis) the men of knowledge among the Jews (and their monks) who reside in monasteries (and the Messiah son of Mary) and they have taken the Messiah son of Mary as lord, (when they were bidden) in all Scriptures (to worship) to confess the divine Oneness of (only One God. There is no god save Him. Be He glorified from all that they ascribe as partner!) Allah exalts Himself above all that which they ascribe to Him." [Ref: 9:31, Tafsir Ibn Abbas] It is also recorded in Musnad Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal, Hadith of Tirmadhi Shareef, Prophet Muhammed (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) explained the meaning of following because the Rabbis declared the Haram as Halal, and Halal as Haram, and the Yahood and Nasara obeyed them: “Narrated 'Adi bin Hatim: "I came to the Prophet while I had a cross of gold around my neck. He said: 'O Adi! Remove this idol from yourself!' And I heard him reciting from Surah Bara'ah: ‘They took their rabbis and monks as lords besides Allah.’ (9:31). He said: 'As for them, they did not worship them, but when they made something lawful for them, they considered it lawful, and when they made something unlawful for them, they considered it unlawful.'" [Ref: Tirmadhi, B44, H3095] Taking Of Satan As Lord Beside Allah: The right to declare something as Halal/Haram is of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala), the Lord of universe, and one who has been conferred this right i.e. Prophet/Messenger (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). From this we gather what Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) had declared Haram and Halal, if anyone other then Him and His Messenger was to change it, and we obeyed them, we then would be guilty of taking that individual as lord in partnership with Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). Or as Prophet after gate of Prophet-hood has been closed. In context of Hadith of Ummah of Arabia worshiping Satan, Satan legalizes taking of others as Ilah beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and legalizes worship these gods. Those who accept his suggestions and engage what he commands in reality take him as a lord beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) also. Note notion that Satan is taken as lord is implied and not explicitly affirmed therefore no major Shirk has taken place. Instead it amounts to minor Shirk if at all. It would be major Shirk if person emphatically attributes Ilahiyyah/Rububiyyah to Satan and performs actions with intention of worship. Also it is not major Shirk because there is implied ihtimal (i.e. possibility) of Satan being taken as a Prophet. Children Of Adam You Should Not Obey Satan: Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) states in Quran: “Did I not command you O children of Adam, that you should not worship the Devil. Verily, he is a plain enemy to you.” [Ref: 36:60] Note the words, "O children of Adam, ...", indicates that Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is referring to every single human, including Prophets and their followers. Verse 61 states Satan lead many people astray (i.e. made them worship him). In this context the commentators of Quran have explained; worship of Satan is obedience of Satan and disobedience to Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala): "(Did I not command you, O Children of Adam, that you should not worship Shaytan Verily, he is a plain enemy to you.) This is a rebuke from Allah to the disbelievers among the sons of Adam, those who obey the Shaytan even though he was a plain enemy to them, and they disobeyed Ar-Rahman Who created them and granted them provision." [Ref: 36:60, Tafsir Ibn Kaseer] "Did I not charge you, command you, O children of Adam, by the tongues of My messengers, that you should not worship Satan, (that you should) not obey him; truly he is a manifest enemy to you, one whose enmity is evident, ..." [Ref: 36:60, Tafsir Jalalayn] "He will also say to them: (Did I not charge you) did I not present to you, in the Scripture brought by the Messenger, (O ye sons of Adam, that ye worship not the devil) that you should not obey the devil. (Lo! he is your open foe) whose enmity is quite manifest!" [Ref: 36:60, Tafsir Ibn Abbas] In the verse Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) has prohibited obedience to Satan because he is avowed enemy of mankind and as an enemy his suggestions would only be destruction. Worship Of Satan Is Same As Taking Satan As Lord: In context of discussion so far it is worth pointing out; taking of creation as a lord beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is obeying creation who has declared a Haram as Halal against the teaching of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). And in language of Quranic verse, 36:60, Satan worship is obedience to Satan and doing against teaching and instruction of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). In other words Satan Harams what Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) Halaled and those who accept his suggestions take him as a lord beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and due to their obedience is of Satan worship. Understanding Hadith Of Satan Lost Hope: Prophet Muhammed (sallallahu alayhi was'sallam) foretold in a Sahih Hadith: "Jabir reported: I heard Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship him in the Peninsula of Arabia, but he (is hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst them." [Ref: Muslim, B39, H6752] Yahood/Nasara took their priests and Rabbis as lords beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) by accepting the Halal as Haram and Haram as Halal. And Satan would be lord if we obey his Haram as Halal and Halal as Haram. In other words we would be guilty of Satan worship (i.e. obedience of Satan) if we accept his direction of Shirk, Kufr, Haram/Halal. Therefore one meaning of following is Satan has given up hope on being taken as lord beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and has despaired of ever being worshipped (i.e. obeyed) by Muslims of Arabian Peninsula: "Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship him in the peninsula of Arabia ..." The Despair Of Satan Would Only Lift After Death Of Muslims: Ummah as whole has refused to obey the individuals who under the influence of Satan have declared Haram as Halal, and Halal as Haram. And Ummah has whole has refused to honor, respect, love, such individuals. Therefore the natural conclusion is; Ummah as whole has not worshipped Ghayrullah including Satan but only worship and obey Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) on serious matters of Haram/Halal. With this Hadith Prophet Muhammed (sallallahu alayhi was'sallam) has certified that Arabian Peninsula as whole from dawn of Islam till blowing of the musky wind will be free from major Shirk in belief and action. And free from Satan and his clans-men being taken Lords besides Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala), free from Satan being obeyed (i.e. worshipped) in matters of Haram and Halal. Meaning his believing Ummah in Arabian Peninsula will not ascribe Ilahiyyah to Satan, or to anyone else, nor confer the right of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala), such as worship, upon any creation. This meaning is derived because attributing Ilahiyyah to a creation is Haram and worshipping others beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is Haram. And Muslim Ummah Arabiyyah, as whole, will not obey Satan in this regard. Hadith records only time Satan would approach the people of Arabia to encourage them to commit Shirk is when all the Muslims would have passed through cool musky wind: “Only the wicked people would survive and they would be as careless as birds with the characteristics of beasts. They would never appreciate the good nor condemn evil. Then Satan would come to them in human form and would say: Don't you respond? And they would say: What do you order us? And he would command them to worship the idols but, in spite of this, they would have abundance of sustenance and lead comfortable lives. Then the trumpet would be blown and no one ....” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H7023] Please read the detailed Hadith in the link provided, here. I am SO confident that I can say with a CHALLENGE; there is no Hadith in vast collections of Ahadith where it is stated that Satan would attempt to encourage the Muslim Ummah, or Muslim of Arabia to committing Shirk. Nor there is proof of Satan coming to Muslim Ummah, or Muslims of Arabia to encourage them to commit Shirk before the blowing of said wind. The confidence stems from the fact that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) as despaired, given up hope, of succeeding in this endeavor. He is so demoralized because of Tawheed and how it has been instilled in Muslims that he would only attempt it after the Muslims of Arabia in specific and world have died. He would come to Kafirs/Atheists of Arabia and say don’t you respond and they will agree to idol worship. And eventually they will revert to religion of their forefathers and worship idols which their fore-fathers used to worship such as Lat and Uzza: “Aisha reported:I heard Allah's Messenger as saying: The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'Uzza.[…] Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them. And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] End Of Those Who Prefer Personal Understanding Over Prophetic Guidance: Those accused the Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah of worshipping graves, tombs, are liars and falsifiers of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). They have disbelieved in RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and instead have surrendered to whispers of Satan of Najd and his minions (i.e. Qarn al-Shaytan). He has incited them to raise their voice over the voice of Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam). They in obedience to Satan, the cursed, have thrown the guidance of beloved Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi was'sallam) behind their backs and have preferred for themselves their own understandings. The end of those who prefer their own opinions over the beloved Messenger (sallallahu alayhi was'sallam) has been explained in a Hadith: “... The Prophet recited Surat An-Najam and prostrated, and there was nobody who did not prostrate then except a man whom I saw taking a handful of pebbles, lifting it, and prostrating on it. He then said, "This is sufficient for me. ...” The narrator then goes on to say: “No doubt I saw him killed as a disbeliever afterwards.” [Ref: Bukhari, B58, H192] The reason for his apostasy are two; one, he preferred his own opinion even when the companions and RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) were present. And this action was in opposition to the Jammah, he deviated from the Jammah, hence he fell prey to Satan and incited him upon disbelief. Two he was too proud to bow to Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) so instead of bowing as Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) taught, i.e. bow on the ground, he picked up the pebbles from ground and placed them on his forehead declaring it to be sufficient replacement for Sajdah. Shaykh Of Najd And Irreligious Idiots Followed Him: Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab Najdi was born in a prominent scholarly family, whose scholarly clout went back to generations. In early childhood he was taught by his father but later on due to hot headedness he would often argue with his father and his teachers on issues which he had not yet learnt fully.[1] As a result of this he was often beaten by his father for arguing when he crossed the limits in arguments. When he got bit older, and exercised independence he stopped learning from his father and journeyed to places far and wide [Iraq, Yemen, Oman, Syria][2] looking for like minded people so he could gain knowledge from them. Upon his return from his studies he started to propagate his brand of Islam, and part of it involved branding Muslims as grave-worshippers, tree -worshippers, saint-worshippers. When this happened his father Shaykh Abdul Wahhab (may Allah bless him) and his brother Shaykh Sulaiman Ibn Abdul Wahhab took upon themselves the task of refuting him and Allah (subhanahu wa ta'ala) granted them success. During the life time of his father Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) humiliated and kept Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab success limited but after he passed away the obstacles which Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) had in path of Wahhabism were pretty much removed. With military might at disposal of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab Shaykh Sulaiman Ibn Abdul Wahhab's opposition amounted to nothing. And people of Najd quickly fell in line with Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab's teachings. The people of Najd were described by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam): “... and those Bedouins who are busy with their camels and pay no attention to Religion; ...” [Ref: Muslim,B54, 520] So their acceptance of his teaching was based on ignorance of true religion of Islam, and secondly at the point of sword. And these, young, but well meaning idiots of Najd then went onto ravage Najd and Arabian Peninsula under the pretext that Muslims have become Mushrik. They made Takfir of Muslims, calling them Mushrikeen, they made killing of Muslims Halal upon themselves. Fighting and killing Muslims is infidelity: "Do not become disbelievers after me by cutting the necks of one another." [Ref: Bukhari, B73, H187] Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab In Corsair Of Prophetic Teaching: It is my instinctive and educated judgment that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam) had foretold about Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi in the following Hadith and people who will be like him: “... Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said: 'The most I fear for you is a man who will recite the Quran until its brightness appears on him and he becomes a supporter to Islam, then he changes it (i.e. Islamic teachings) to what Allah permits and wills. Upon that, the man become detached from it (i.e. Islam), and he throws it behind his back, and start to fight his neighbor with sword, and he accuse him (his neighbor) of shirk". I (i.e. Hudhaifah) said: O prophet of Allah (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam): Who amongst them both deserve to be called a Mushrik? The accused or the accuser? He replied: "The accuser" [Ref: Sahih Ibn Hibban,Vo1, H81] The trait of Wahhabi's was and still is that they accuse Muslims of committing Shirk and Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was'sallam) said Ummah as whole will be free from Shirk, and told that one accusing his Ummatis of Shirk will in reality will be Mushrik. Conclusion: Meaning of Satan worship in language of Quran is obedience to Satan and it is in same meaning as the Jews and Christians took their religious scholars as lords beside Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said Satan will not be worshipped by worshippers of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) in Arabian Peninsula. And one meaning of this is that Muslim of Arabian Peninsula would not accept a Haram as Halal, and a Halal as Haram on the instruction of Iblees. Obedience to him in this regard would be worship of Satan. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi FootNotes: - [1] My judgment is that Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab’s arguments with his father and his teachers were regarding creed of Tawheed and Shirk. And no where else his lack of proper understanding of basics of Islam demonstrates best then in creed of Shirk and its definition. Unfortunately, which even the inheritors of his brand of Kharijism are also plagued with. As result any discussion with his minions on subject of Tawheed/Shirk, and on methodology of determining Tawheed/Shirk quickly denegerates to an imbecilic level. - [2] Iraq, Yemen, and Oman had noteworthy population of Ibadi Kharijism. And his choice to visit these three countries for studies is more then enough proof of Kharijism. And why he returned Takfir maniac and made Halal the blood, women, and property of Muslims. ------------------------------------------- Formating And Content Improved.
  18. مفتی صاحب اگر مذکورہ بالا سوالات آج کے دور میں دوستوں سے کرے جائیں گے تو مزاق اڑانے کے علاوہ کوئی کچھ بھی نہیں کہیے گا لھٰذا آپ کی مدد بتہاشا قابل ی ستائش ہوگی
  19. Muslims Will Not Fall Into Idolatry In Arabian Peninsula. Intorduction: In 17th century Muhammed Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi at-Tamimi rose up against Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat of Arabian peninsula accusing them of major Shirk; grave-worshipping and tree-worshipping etc. Three hundered years later his fallowers are doing their best to spread their Khariji heresy with similar tactics. When it is explained to the Wahhabi's; RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam) stated clearly in Sahih Ahadith that Ummah will not worship others beside Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) they resort to false interpretations to defend their positions. Or when Muhammed bin Abdul Wahhab Najdi at-Tamimi is criticised for his takfir of Muslims his fallowers resort to: 'Indeed people of Arabia in his time were upon major Shirk, they worshipped the graves, trees, made mosques on graves and worshipped the dead saints. Therefore after exhorting them to repent Shaykh declared them as Mushrik, and there is no wrong in this.' This line of response maybe best form of defence for a person who has his brain in cloud cuckoo land. With decerning knowledge of Quran, Sunnah it becomes apparent that this defence of Shaykh of Najd is nothing but a monstrosity to defend a monstrous Takfiri rebel of Sharia. If Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) wills this article will establish with clear evidences from Quran and Sunnah that people of Arabian peninsula were not guilty of Shirk; this would establish with no ambiguity that Takfir of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab was unjust.[1] Ahadith Of Prophet About Satan Worship In Arabian Peninsula: "Jabir reported: I heard Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship (him) in the peninsula of Arabia, but he (is hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst them." [Ref: Muslim, B39, H6752] “It was narrated from Sulaiman bin ‘Amr bin Ahwas that his father said: “I heard the Prophet () say, during the Farewell Pilgrimage: ‘O people! Which day is the most sacred?’ three times. They said: ‘The day of the greatest Hajj.’ He said: ‘Your blood and your wealth and your honor are sacred to one another, as sacred as this day of yours, in this land of your. No sinner commits a sin but it is against himself. No father is to be punished for the sins of his child, and no child is to be punished for the sins of his father. Satan has despaired of ever being worshipping in this land of yours, but he will be obeyed in some matters which you regard as insignificant, and he will be content with that. All the blood feuds of the Ignorance days are abolished, and the first of them that I abolish is the blood feud of Harith bin ‘Abdul-Muttalib, who was nursed among Banu Laith and killed by Hudhail. All the usuries of the Ignorance days are abolished, but you will have your capital. Do not wrong others and you will not be wronged. O my nation, have I conveyed (the message)?’ (He asked this) three times. They said: ‘Yes.’ He said: ‘O Allah, bear witness!’ three times.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol1, B25, H3055] People Of Prophet Ibrahim And His Father Worshipped Idol-Gods: Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) addressing his father states: “Behold, he said to his father: "O my father! why worship that which heareth not and seeth not, and can profit thee nothing?” [Ref: 19:42] In verse 46, Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) makes clear that Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) refered to idol gods with above words that’s why his father responds with a question: “(The father) replied: "Dost thou hate my gods, O Abraham? If thou forbear not, I will indeed stone thee: Now get away from me for a good long while!" [Ref: 19:46] The gods refered in the above verse were idols, which the people Ibrahim (alayhis salam) worshipped: "Lo! Abraham said to his father Azar: "Takest thou idols for gods? For I see thee and thy people in manifest error." [Ref: 6:74] In summary people of Ibrahim (alayhis salam), as well as his father took idols as gods besides Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) and worshiped them as such. Due to inability of idols to hear the call, seeing Mushrikeen, and there lack of helpfulness Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) reasoned with his father: “Why worship that which heareth not and seeth not, and can profit thee nothing?” [Ref: 19:42] Meaning Of Prophet Ibrahim’s (alayhis salam) Referrence Of Satan Worship: In verse 43 Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) continues to exhort his father Azhar: "… To me has come knowledge which has not reached thee: so follow me: I will guide thee to a way that is even and straight (i.e. worship of Allah).” [Ref: 19:43] In language of Quran worship of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is straight path: “And that you should worship Me. That is the straight path.“ [Ref: 36:61] So Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) said to his father follow me I will guide you to worshiping Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). In the next verse, 44, as part of the exhortion; Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) says to his father to abstain from worship of Satan: "O my father! Worship not satan: for satan is a rebel against Ar'Rahman (i.e. Allah the most Gracious).” [Ref: 19:44] When the facts are clear that father of Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) and his people worshipped idol-gods. Then logical deduction is that Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) termed worship of idol-gods of his people as Satan-worship. In the following there is indication that father of Prophet Ibrahim (alayhis salam) understood worship of Satan as idol-worship. And therefore he responded by saying: “(The father) replied: "Dost thou hate my gods, O Abraham? If thou forbear not, I will indeed stone thee: Now get away from me for a good long while!" [Ref: 19:46] Clear Proof Establishes Goddess Worship Is Worship Of Satan: Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) states; Mushrikeen leave Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) and instead call upon in worship to the goddesses: “(The Mushrikeen) leaving Him (i.e. Allah) call but upon (i.e. yad'una) goddesses: They call but upon satan the persistent rebel!” [Ref: 4:117] Invocation directed toward a diety/god is worship. Therefore when the polytheists of Arabia invoked on their goddesses they in reality worshipped them. And their this act of worship is termed as if they actually call upon Satan the persistent rebel. Their goddesses are mentioned in Quran: “Have ye seen Lat and Uzza. And another, the third Manat? What! for you the male , and for Him, the female?” [Ref: 53:19/21] Commentators Of Quran Idol-Worship Is Satan Worship: The interpretation that 'idolatory is worship of Shaytan' or 'worship of Shaytan is idolatory' is affirmed by commentators of Quran. First of all I quote Sayyidil Mufassireen Ibn Abbas (radiallah ta'ala anh): “(They invoke in His stead) the people of Mecca worship in place of Allah (only females) lifeless idols such as al-Lat, al-'Uzza and Manat; (they pray to) they worship (none else than Satan, a rebel) who is intense in his rebellion.” [Ref: 4:11, Tafsir Ibn Abbas] Tafsir of Jalal Ud Din Suyuti (rahimullah alayhi ta'ala), and Jalal Ud Din Al Mahalli (rahimullah alayhi ta'ala) makes it absolutely clear that idol worship is reffered as Satan worship: “What (in, is [to be understand as] mā, ‘only’) they pray to, [what] the idolaters worship, instead of Him, God, that is, other than Him, are but females, idols with feminine names, such as al-Lāt, al-‘Uzza and Manāt; and they (in, is [to be understand as] mā, ‘only’) only pray to, they [only] worship, by worshipping [these female idols], a rebellious satan, one who has rebelled against obedience [to God], for they are obeying him in this [worship of female idols][2].” [Ref: 4:11, Tafsir Al Jalalayn] Ibn Kathir (rahimullah alayhi ta'ala) leaves no doubt in mind that idol-worship is being refered as Shaytaan worship: “They invoke nothing but female deities besides Him.” The idolators claimed that the angels are Allah's daughters, saying, `We only worship them so that they bring us closer to Allah.' So they took the angels as gods, made the shapes of girls and decided, `These (idols) resemble the daughters of Allah (i.e., the angels), Whom we worship. ''' This is similar to Allah's statements: “Have you then considered Al-Lat and Al-`Uzza” (53:19) “And they make the angels who themselves are servants of the Most Gracious (Allah) females.” (43:19) and “And they have invented a kinship between Him and the Jinn.” (37:158) Allah's statement: “and they invoke nothing but Shaytan, a persistent rebel!” means, Shaytan has commanded them to do this and made it seem fair and beautiful in their eyes. Consequently, they are worshipping Shaytan in reality, just as Allah said in another Ayah: ...” [Ref: 4:11, Tafsir Ibn Kathir] Based on the Quranic evidence and supplementary evidence from classical commentarie it can be concluded that idol worship is in reality Satan worship. Muslims Will Not Worship Satan In Arabian Peninsula: Prophet (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) has stated in a authentic Hadith: "Jabir reported: I heard Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) as saying: Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship (him) in the peninsula of Arabia, but he (is hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst them." [Ref: Muslim, B39, H6752] In the language of Quran idol worship is synonymous with worship of Satan: “(The Mushrikeen) leaving Him (i.e. Allah), call but upon goddesses: They call but upon satan the persistent rebel!” In this context Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: “...the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship {him} in the peninsula of Arabia, ...” Therefore the meaning of Prophet's (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) statement is that Satan has lost hope in succeeding to incite the worshippers of Allah (subhana wa ta'la); the Muslims; to take idol as gods beside Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) in Arabian peninsula and worship them. Shirk In Arabian Peninsula: It is recorded in a authentic hadith that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’salam) that those Muslims who have iota of faith in their hearts they will die when Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) will send a fragrant musky wind which will take the lives of all the believers. Those remaining will be the worst of people on earth, and it is on these people that Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) will establish day of judgement: “... A group of people from my Umma will continue to fight in obedience to the Command of Allah, remaining dominant over their enemies. Those who will oppose them shall not do them any harm. They will remain ill this condition until the Hour overtakes them. (At this) 'Abdullah said: Yes. Then Allah will raise a wind which will be fragrant like musk and whose touch will be like the touch of silk; (but) it will cause the death of all (faithful) persons, not leaving behind a single person with an iota of faith in his heart. Then only the worst of men will remain to be overwhelmed by the Hour.” [Ref: Muslim, B20, H4721] Another Hadith of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) reveals that day of judgement will not be established until people revert back to worship of pre-Islamic idol-gods Lat and Uzza: “'A'isha reported: I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and Uzza. I said: Allah's Messenger, I think when Allah has revealed this verse: "He it is Who has sent His Messenger with right guidance, and true religion, so that He may cause it to prevail upon all religions, though the polytheists are averse (to it)." (9:33) It implies that (this promise) is going to be fulfilled. Thereupon he (Allah's Apostle) said: It would happen as Allah would like. Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them. And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers.” [Ref: Muslim, B41, H6945] BreakDown Of Hadith To Understand When And Who Will Become Mushrik: Ummul Momineen Aysha (radiallah ta'ala anha), the truthful, questioned Prophet (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) after hearing this saying: “’He it is Who has sent His Messenger with right guidance, and true religion, so that He may cause it to prevail upon all religions, though the polytheists are averse (to it).’ It implies that (this promise) is going to be fulfilled.” Upon hearing this from her Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was'sallam) replied: “Then Allah would send the sweet fragrant air by which everyone who has even a mustard grain of faith in Him would die and those only would survive who would have no goodness in them.” Note in another Hadith words are every Muslim and every Momin would die due to this wind. This saying is same as above Hadith where Prophet is reported to have said that worst people will be left behind: “Then only the worst of men will remain to be overwhelmed ...” The people remaining in Arabian peninsula will be worst for many reasons but one of those reasons is: “And they would revert to the religion of their forefathers.” And part of Arabs reverting to religion of fore-fathers is that: “The (system) of night and day would not end until the people have taken to the worship of Lat and 'uzza.” To simplify the Muslims would die from face of earth and only Kafirs would remain and then people would revert back to religion of their forefathers and for Arabs it is reverting to worship of mentioned idols. In other words the Hadith is specific to Arabs and not all people of earth. And it is specific about Kafirs reverting to idolartory not Muslims. UnJustifief Takfir Of Muslims Returns To Issuer: Beloved Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) stated: “It is reported on the authority of Ibn 'Umar that the Apostle (may peace and blessings be upon him) observed: When a man calls his brother an unbeliever, it returns (at least) to one of them.” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H116] The narration has been explained by another: ”Narrated Abu Dhar: That he heard the Prophet saying, "If somebody accuses another of Fusuq (i.e. wickedness by calling him wicked) or accuses him of Kufr, such an accusation will revert to him (i.e. to the accuser) if his companion (i.e. the accused) is innocent." [Ref: Bukhari, B73, H71] “... Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) said: 'The most I fear on you is a man who will recite the Quran until its brightness appears on him and he becomes a supporter to Islam, then he changes it (i.e. Islamic teachings) to what Allah permits and wills. Upon that, the man become detached from it (i.e. Islam), and he throws it behind his back, and start to fight his neighbor with sword, and he accuse him (his neighbor) of shirk". I (i.e. Hudhaifah) said: O prophet of Allah (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam): Who amongst them both deserve to be called a Mushrik? The accused or the accuser? He replied: "The accuser" [Ref: Sahih Ibn Hibban,V1, H81] These three ahadith establish without doubt that one who makes Takfir of a underserving person; a person who isnt upon Kuffr Al Akbar or upon Shirk Al Akbar then the Takfir returns upon the one who accuses the Muslim of kuffr or shirk. The Truths Established So Far And Implications Of Them: In the terminology of Quran worship of idol gods and goddesses is synonymous with worship of Satan therefore the meaning of following prophetic statement is that Muslims in Arabian peninsula will not revert back to idolatory in any time: “...the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship {him} in the peninsula of Arabia, ...” Instead people of Arabia will revert to worship of al-Lat, and Uzza; after all the Muslims have died. And the rabble left behind will consist of immoral, irreligious, atheists, who will over time will revert back to idolatory and this is evidenced by following Hadith: “... I heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Only the wicked people would survive and they would be as careless as birds with the charactertistics of beasts. They would never appreciate the good nor condemn evil. Then the satan would come to them in human form and would say: Don't you respond? And they would say: What do you order us? And he would command them to worship the idols but, in spite of this, they would have abundance of sustenance and lead comfortable lives. Then the trumpet ...” [Ref: Muslim B41, H7023] Note that prior to the blowing of musky wind which will take the lives of believers RasoolAllah (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) did not indicate Muslims reverting back to Shirk in the Arabian peninsula had there been any chance of Muslims reverting to idolatory prior to the mentioned time Messenger (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) would have informed the believers of it. This refutes the claim of Wahhabiyah that in Arabian Peninsula Shirk was being practiced prior to and during the life of founder of Wahhabism. And Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab strived to bring people back to Tawheed of Kitabullah & Sunnah of RasoolAllah (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam). And it is also has been proven that Takfir of Muslims, Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah, by Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his minions of Satan[3] under the pretext of Shirk is established as unjust, and stands refuted. The Misguided Are Misguided After Knowledge Of Guidance Has Been Granted: This leads to the natural conclusion that Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab's and Takfir made by his minions; of Muslims, Ahlus Sunnah, returned upon him and his followers. And the excuse of ignorance can not be extended to him. He was a man of knowledge who had inherited from his father the creed of Ahlus Sunnah which he threw behind his back and deviated from path of Ahlus Sunnah. Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) has stated about such people: "And Allaah is not one to misguide a people after He has guided them, until He explains to them that which they should avoid." [Ref: 9:115] Muhammed Ibn Abdul Wahhab opposed what Messenger of Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) stated in the authenticly reported Ahadith and about such people Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) has stated: "And whoever contends with the Messenger after the guidance has been made clear to him, and he follows a path other than the path of the believers, We shall leave him in the path he has chosen and land him in Jahannam, an evil refuge" [Ref: 4:115] Therefore the apostacy of Muhammed Ibn Abdul Wahhab is certain and it would be legitimate to call him Kafir. Those who make Takfir of Muslims in obedience to Shaykh of Najd are also guilty of Kufr but Takfir of such people should not be made until it becomes apparent that their rejection does not stem from ignorance. Even then it would be advised that Takfir is not made until the individual shows sign of Abu Jahli type of rejection, opposition and hate of Ahlus Sunnah; and all means of correction have been exhausted. Conclusion: In the lanugage of Quran Satan worship is termed as worship of idols. Statement that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) does not fear people of Arabia would worship Satan because he has despaired means; Satan has given up hope of managing to misguide Muslims to worship idols in Arabian Peninsula. Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab’s Khariji movement was started because he believed Muslims of Arabia are worshipping idols and almost all have become Mushrik to an extent that none of them knew meaning of simple words of Tawheed; none has the right to be worshipped except Allah. Shaykh of Najd belied Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and we are instrcuted to believe in Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and His beloved Messenger (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) and not one who contends with him in his religion. Wama alayna ilal balaghul mubeen. Muhammed Ali Razavi FootNotes: - [1] Naturally if the Takfir of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab was erroneous any arguments used to defend Shaykh an'Najdi's Takfir would automatically be erronenous. And any arguments used by his co-religionists to implicate members of Ahle Sunnat in Shirk would be by default falsehood because Prophet (sallalahu alayhi was'sallam) testified that people of Arabian peninsula will be free from Shirk until a apointed time. - [2] Someone may attempt to argue the two propositions are not same i.e. idol/goddess worship and Satan worship. Note according to Quran all forms of idol/god worship is worship of Satan in reality, and if Satan was directly worshipped as god it would also be idolatory. The difference is that idol worship indirectly leads to satan worship. In reality idolatory is worship of Satan because he made taking of idol as Ilah and worship of these Ilahs beside Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) as Halal: “... but it is satan who turns them away from the right religion and he makes unlawful what has been declared lawful for them and he commands them to ascribe partnership with Him, although he has no justification for that.” [Ref: Bukhari, B40, H6853] This is something which Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) declared Haram. Those who obeyed Satan and took his declared Halal and believed it they took him as Lord besides Allah (subhana wa ta'ala). Obedience to Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) is worship because obedience to Him entails, fear, respecting, honouring His commands. Therefore those who honour, respect and fear these idol-gods and worship them also obey Satan hence his obedience implies worship of Satan. - [3] Qarn ash'Shaytan (i.e. group of devil) was to emerge from East of Makkah and Madinah: “I heard Allah's Messenger as saying while pointing his hands towards the east: The turmoil would appear from this side; verily, the turmoil would appear from this side where appear the group of Satan.” [ref: Muslim, B41, H6942] Najd is in East of Madinah and Makkah. Darriyah is exact due east [a town in Najd] where Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab was born: “(The Prophet) said, "O Allah! Bless our Sham and our Yemen." People said, "Our Najd as well." ... On that the Prophet said, "There will appear earthquakes and afflictions, and from there will come out the side of the group of Satan." [Ref: Bukhari, B17, H147] - [4] If a Khariji makes Takfir of members of Ahlus Sunnah under whatever pre-text the Muslims should say with conviction and sincere belief: ‘None has the right to be worshipped except Allah.' And this would be sufficient to prove he is a liar: “From Ubayd-Allah Ibn Umar, from Nafi: A man said to Ibn `Umar: "I have a neighbor who bears witness against me that I commit shirk." He replied: "Say: 'La Ilaha ill Allah,' you will make him a liar." [Ref: Tibyan al Kadhib al Muftari, by Imam Ibn Asakir, Page 373.] It will also earn the reciter the intercession of beloved Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi was’sallam) on the day of judgement; where he would request from Allah (subhana wa ta'ala) reciters entrance to paradise: “The luckiest person who will have my intercession on the Day of Resurrection will be the one who said, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' sincerely from the bottom of his heart." [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H574] ------------------------------------------- Formatting And Content Improved.
  20. Koi Bhai Muhal Bil Gair Ko Tafseel se samjha sakta hai Example ke saath
  21. السلام علیکم اسلامی نیٹ ورک پچھلے کئی سالوں سے دین حق مسلک حق اھلسنت و جماعت حنفی بریلوی کی خدمت کے لئے کوشاں ہے۔ اس تمام عرصے میں ہمارے اخراجات ٹیم ممبرز اور دیگر سنی حضرات کے تعاون سے کئے جاتےرہے ہیں. اسلامی محفل اور دیگر اسلامی ویب سائیٹس کی ہوسٹنگ ری نیوول بہت ہی قریب ہے۔ 31 دسمبر 2018 کو ہوسٹنگ کی مقررہ مدت ختم ہو چکی ہے۔ ابھی یہ 60 دن کا گریس پیریڈ شروع ہے جو کہ ہوسٹنگ کمپنی کی جانب سے ہر کلائنٹ کو کچھ اضافی وقت دیا جاتا ہے اخراجات ادا کرنے کیلئے۔ یہ وقت مارچ کے شروع تک ختم ہوجائے گا۔ اگر اس عرصہ کے دوران ہم نے ہوسٹنگ فیس ادا نہ کی تو ہمارا اکائونٹ ختم ہونے کا خدشہ ہے۔ تمام ویب سائیٹس کا ڈیٹا اتنا زیادہ ہے کہ اسے بیک اپ اور ٹرانسفر کرنے میں بھی شدید دشواری کا سامنا ہوسکتا ہے۔ اس سلسلے میں تمام ممبرز سے گزارش ہے کہ تعاون فرمائیں۔ ہوسٹنگ کے کل اخراجات 417$ جو کہ پانچ سال (31 دسمبر 2023) تک کیلئے ہیں۔ ویب ہوسٹنگ کے ساتھ اسلامی ایجوکیشن ڈاٹ کام ڈومین کی ری نیوول بھی اگلے ماہ ہے۔۔ 460$ ہمارا ہدف ہے۔ اگر پانچ سال کی ہوسٹنگ کا پیکج نہ لیا جائے اور ماہانہ یا سالانہ ہوسٹنگ پیکج کیا جائے تو ماہانہ اخراجات زیادہ ہو نگے۔ موجودہ ماہانہ فی 6.95$ ہے پانچ سال کی ایک ساتھ ادا کرنے کے حساب سے۔ جبکہ اگر اسے ماہانہ پیکج میں کنورٹ کر دیا جائے تو یہ ماہانہ فی 10.95$ ہوگی۔ اگر ایک سال کی ایک ساتھ ادا کی جائے تو ماہانہ چارجز 9.95$ ہونگے۔ اسی طرح دو سال کی ایک ساتھ ادا کرنے پر 8.95$ اور تین سال کی ایک ساتھ ادا کرنے پر ماہانہ چارجز 7.95$ ہیں۔ آپ حضرات کے تعاون سے ہمیں ہدف مل جائے تو ہوسٹنگ اور ڈومین دونوں پانچ سال کیلئے ری نیو ہو جائیں۔ برائے کرم جتنا ہو سکتا ہے تعاون فرمائیں۔ جزاک اللہ خیرا Hosting Expired (31 Dec 2018), Grace Period Expires on 1 March 2019 IslamiEducaton.com Domain Expires on 22 January 2019 Web Hosting Charges: $417 every five years ($6.95 per month) 2019 to 2024 1 Year renewal fee for IslamiEducation.com: $8.99
  22. مولانا محمد قاسم نانوتوی رحمۃاللہ علیہ پرختم نبوت کے منکر ہونے کا الزام اور اس کی حقیقت .... ================================ (حافظ عبيدالله) جماعت مرزائیہ جس طرح قرآن وحدیث اور دوسرے بزرگان وصوفیاء کرام کی عبارات میں تحریف معنوی کرکے اپنی خود ساختہ نبوت ثابت کرنے کی کوشش کرتی ہے ، ایسے ہی حضرت مولانامحمد قاسم نانوتوی رحمۃ اللہ علیہ کی ایک کتاب ’’تحذیر الناس ‘‘ کے مختلف مقامات سے ناتمام عبارات ماقبل ومابعد کے الفاظ حذف کرکے پیش کرتے ہیں اور یہ کہتے ہیں کہ مولانا بھی اجراء نبوت کے قائل تھے حالانکہ مولانا اپنی اسی کتاب میں منکر ختم نبوت کو کافر ومرتد کہتے ہیں لیکن افسوس یہ ہے کہ مرزائیوں کے ساتھ ساتھ مسلمانوں کا ایک گروہ بھی دانستہ یا نادانستہ اس بات پر مصر ہے کہ حضرت مولانا نانوتوی رحمۃ اللہ علیہ اجراء نبوت کے قائل ہیں اور قادیانیوں نے انہی کی عبارات کو دلیل بناکر مرزا قادیانی کی نبوت کو ثابت کیا ہے، ہمارے خیال میں یہ حضرات مولانا نانوتویؒ کے ساتھ بغض کی وجہ سے ایسا کہتے ہیں کیونکہ مرزائی تو حضرت مجدد الف ثانیؒ، شاہ ولی اللہ دہلویؒ ، ملا علی قاریؒ ، شیخ محی الدین ابن عربیؒ اور شیخ عبدالوہاب شعرانیؒ وغیرہم کی عبارات بھی اپنے حق میں پیش کرتے ہیں تو پھر صرف مولانا نانوتویؒ پر یہ غصہ اور ناراضگی کیوں کہ مرزائی صرف ان کی عبارات سے اپنا عقیدہ ثابت کرتے ہیں؟ اصل میں بہت سے لوگ قصور فہم کی وجہ سے مولانا کے بارے میں غلط فہمی میں مبتلا ہوئے اور کچھ لوگوں نے جان بوجھ کر مولانا کی کتاب کے مختلف مقامات سے ناتمام عبارتوں کے ٹکڑوں کو جوڑ کر لوگوں کے سامنے پیش کرنا شروع کردیا جس سے سادہ لوح عوام تردد میں پڑگئے ، اللہ ہمیں عدل وانصاف کے ساتھ کام لینے کی توفیق دے۔ ہم سب سے پہلے مولانا قاسم نانوتوی رحمۃ اللہ علیہ کی وہ عبارات پیش کرتے ہیں جن کے اندر صاف طور پر انہوں نے لکھا ہے کہ آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم آخری نبی ہیں اور آپ کا زمانہ آخری ہے ، اور رسول اللہ صلى الله عليه وسلم کے بعد کسی نبی کے آنے کا احتمال نہیں ، جو اس کا قائل ہو اسے کافر سمجھتا ہوں وغیرہ، اس کے بعد ہم مولانا کی تحذیر الناس کی اس عبارت (یا عبارت کے ٹکڑوں) پر بات کریں گے جنہیں لے کر جماعت مرزائیہ اور ہمارے کچھ نا سمجھ مسلمان دوست بھی مولانا کے بارے میں غلط فہمی میں مبتلا ہوئے ۔ آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم کے بعد کسی اور نبی کے ہونے کا احتمال نہیں جواس میں تاویل کرے اس کو کافر سمجھتا ہوں --------------------------------------------- مولاناؒ لکھتے ہیں:۔ ’’ اپنا دین وایمان ہے بعد رسول اللہ صلى الله عليه وسلم کسی اور نبی کے ہونے کا احتمال نہیں جو اس میں تاویل کرے اس کو کافر سمجھتا ہوں‘‘ ۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ ، صفحہ 144، مکتبہ قاسم العلوم ، کورنگی ، کراچی) واضح رہے کہ مولانا نانوتویؒ کی کتاب ’’تحذیر الناس‘‘ کی کچھ عبارات پر ایک صاحب علم مولانا عبدالعزیز رحمۃ اللہ علیہ نے مولانا کے سامنے چند اعتراضات واشکالات خطوط کی صورت میں پیش کے تھے جن کاجواب مولانا نانوتویؒ نے دیا ، مناظرہ عجیبہ اسی سلسلے کی خط وکتابت کا مجموعہ ہے ، اس طرح ہم کہہ سکتے ہیں کہ ’’مناظرہ عجیبہ‘‘ گویا کہ ’’تحذیر الناس‘‘ کی شرح ہے جس میں حضرت نانوتوی ؒنے تحذیر الناس میں لکھی گئی عبارات کی تشریح اوروضاحت فرمادی ۔ مولانا نانوتویؒ ایک جگہ لکھتے ہیں:۔ ’’حضرت خاتم النبیین صلى الله عليه وسلم کی خاتمیت زمانی تو سب کے نزدیک مسلم ہے اور یہ بات بھی سب کے نزدیک مسلم ہے کہ آپ اول المخلوقات ہیں…‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ ، صفحہ 9 ، مکتبہ قاسم العلوم ، کورنگی ، کراچی) لیجیے مولانا صاف لکھ رہے ہیں کہ آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم کی خاتمیت زمانی یعنی آپ کا تمام انبیاء کے آخر میں مبعوث ہونا تو ایسی بات ہے جو سب کے نزدیک مسلم ہے ، اس میں تو کوئی کلام ہی نہیں ۔ خاتمیت زمانی سے انکارنہیں بلکہ منکروں کے لئے انکار کی گنجائش نہیں چھوڑی ---------------------------------------- ایک جگہ لکھتے ہیں:۔ ’’حاصل مطلب یہ ہے کہ خاتمیت زمانی سے مجھ کو انکار نہیں بلکہ یوں کہیے کہ منکروں کے لئے گنجائش انکار نہ چھوڑی ، افضلیت کا اقرار ہے بلکہ اقرار کرنے والوں کے پاؤں جما دیے ،اور نبیوں کی نبوت پر ایمان ہے ، رسول اللہ صلى الله عليه وسلم کے برابر کسی کو نہیں سمجھتا …‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ ، صفحہ 71، مکتبہ قاسم العلوم ، کورنگی ، کراچی) یہاں ایک بار پھر صاف لفظوں میں اقرار کیا کہ آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم کی خاتمیت زمانی سے مولانا کو انکار نہیں ، اسی طرح آپ آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم کو افضل الرسل سمجھتے ہیں اور آپ کے ہم مرتبہ کسی کو نہیں سمجھتے ۔ پھر مولانا عبدالعزیز صاحب کو جواب دیتے ہوئے لکھتے ہیں:۔ ’’آپ ہی فرمائیں تأخر زمانی اور خاتمیت عصر نبوت کو میں نے کب باطل کیا اور کہاں باطل کیا؟ مولانا میں نے خاتم کے وہی معنی رکھے جو اہل لغت سے منقول ہیں ، اہل زبان میں مشہور ہیں ‘‘ ۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ ، صفحہ 52) آگے چلنے سے پہلے یہ بیان کرنا ضروری ہے کہ مولانا نانوتوی رحمۃ اللہ علیہ کا رسالہ ’’تحذیر الناس‘‘ در اصل ایک سوال کے جواب میں لکھا گیا تھا جس میں حضرت عبداللہ بن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما کے ایک اثر جس میں سات زمینوں اور ان کے انبیاء کا ذکر ہے اور جسے امام بیہقی وغیرہ نے صحیح کہا ہے (کتاب الاسماء والصفات للبیہقی جلد 2 صفحہ 268 ، باب بدء الخلق، روایت نمبر 832 ،طبع مکتبۃ السوادی) کو درج کرکے اس کی آیت خاتم النبیین کے ساتھ تطبیق دریافت کی گئی تھی کہ آیا بیک وقت آیت اور حضرت ابن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما کے اس اثر پر عقیدہ رکھنا ممکن ہے؟ اس سوال کا جواب تین طرح سے ممکن تھا : نمبر 1: آیت اور اس اثر میں تعارض ہے لہذا حضرت ابن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما کے اس اثر کو غلط سمجھا جائے ۔ نمبر 2 : یہ اثر صحیح ہے ، پھر آیت کے ساتھ اس کی تطبیق یوں ہے کہ آیت میں آپe کی خاتمیت صرف ہماری اس زمین کے اعتبار سے بیان کی گئی ہے اور آپ صرف اس زمین کے خاتم النبیین ہیں ۔ نمبر 3 : آیت اور ابن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما کے اثر دونوں کو تسلیم کرکے ایسی تطبیق دی جائے کہ آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم کی خاتمیت صرف اس زمین تک محدود نہ رہے بلکہ باقی زمینوں بلکہ ساری کائنات پر محیط ہو۔ چنانچہ کچھ لوگوں نے پہلی یا دوسری صورت اختیار کی ، لیکن مولانا نانوتویؒ نے آیت اور اثر ابن عباسؓ دونوں کو صحیح قرار دے کر تیسرا جواب اختیار کیا ، مولانا کی ساری کتاب کا خلاصہ یہ ہے کہ آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم ہماری زمین کے اعتبار سے تو خاتم النبیین ہیں باعتبار خاتمیت مرتبی کے بھی اور باعتبار خاتمیت زمانی کے بھی ، لیکن آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم کی خاتمیت صرف اسی زمین تک محدود نہیں بلکہ پوری کائنات کے بھی خاتم النبیین ہیں ، اور چونکہ حضرت ابن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما کی روایت میں مزید چھ زمینوں اور ان میں ہونے والے نبیوں کا بھی ذکر ہے تو اگر بالفرض ہزار زمینیں بھی اور ہوتیں اور ان میں سلسلہ نبوت جاری ہوتا اور چونکہ ان کے انبیاء کے بارے میں یہ تصریح نہیں آئی کہ وہ آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم سے پہلے ہوئے یا بعد میں تو دونوں احتمال موجود ہیں پس اگر وہ انبیاء بھی آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم سے پہلے آئے تو ان کے لئے بھی آپ خاتم النبیین ہیں زمانے کے لحاظ سے بھی اور مرتبے کے لحاظ سے بھی اور اگر بالفرض (جی ہاں اگر فرض کیا جائے کہ) دوسری زمینوں کے انبیاء آپ کے ہم عصر یا بالفرض آپ کے بعد ہوں تو بھی آپ ان تمام نبیوں کے بھی خاتم ہوتے لیکن صرف ختم نبوت مرتبی اور ذاتی کے لحاظ سے۔ مرزائی مربیوں نے مولانا کی اس بات کو جو ختم نبوت مرتبی سے متعلق ہے سیاق وسباق سے کاٹ کر اس طرح پیش کیا کہ گویا یہ ختم نبوت زمانی سے متعلق ہے اور محض اتنے ہی حصے کو مولانا کا عقیدہ بتا کر دھوکہ دیا اور مولانا نے خاتمیت زمانی کے بارے میں جولکھا اسے یک سر ذکر نہ کیا گیا ۔ فائدہ: ختم نبوت زمانی کا مطلب ہے کہ آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم زمانہ کے لحاظ سے اللہ کے آخری نبی ہیں اور آپ کے بعد کسی کو نبوت نہیں ملنی اور نہ کسی نبی کا پیدا ہونا ممکن ہے ، یہ شان آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم کو اس وقت حاصل ہوئی جب تمام انبیاء یکے بعد دیگرے دنیا میں تشریف لاچکے اور سب سے آخرمیں آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم کو مبعوث فرمایا گیا ، جبکہ ختم نبوت مرتبی کا یہ مطلب ہے کہ آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم کے نبوت کے تمام مراتب ختم ہیں اور آپ مرتبے کی لحاظ سے بھی تمام انبیاء سے آخر ہیں اور شان کے لحاظ سے اللہ کے آخری نبی ہیں ، ختم نبوت مرتبی تو آپ صلى الله عليه وسلم کو اس وقت بھی حاصل تھی جب ابھی حضرت آدم علیہ السلام خلعت نبوت سے سرفراز نہ ہوئے تھے، اس ختم نبوت مرتبی کے ہوتے ہوئے تمام انبیاء کرام یکے بعد دیگرے تشریف لاتے رہے ، معلوم ہوا کہ صرف ختم نبوت مرتبی اپنی ذات کے لحاظ سے اور نبیوں کو مانع نہیں ، لیکن عقیدے کے لئے صرف یہی ختم نبوت مرتبی کافی نہیں بلکہ اس کے ساتھ ختم نبوت زمانی کا اقرار بھی لازم ہے جیساکہ مولانا نے متعدد مقامات پر اس کی تصریح کی ہے (جن میں سے کچھ حوالے پہلے بیان ہوئے اور چند آگے بیان ہوں گے) ۔ تو مولانا نانوتویؒ کے مطابق آیت خاتم النبیین سے ختم نبوت مرتبی اور ختم نبوت زمانی دونوں ثابت ہیں ، چاہے ختم نبوت مرتبی کو آیت کا مدلول مطابقی لیا جائے اور ختم نبوت زمانی کو اس کا مدلول التزامی ، یا دوسری صورت یہ کہ ختم نبوت کو عام اور مطلق رکھا جائے اور ختم نبوت زمانی ومرتبی (بلکہ ایک تیسری قسم ختم نبوت مکانی) کو بھی آیت خاتم النبیین کا مدلول مطابقی قرار دیا جائے، اور اس دوسری صورت کو مولانا نے اپنا مختار بتلایا ہے ، بہرحال دونوں صورتوں میں سے جو بھی اختیار کی جائے ختم نبوت زمانی کا اقرار دونوں میں موجود ہے اور ختم نبوت مرتبی اس کے علاوہ ایک اور فضیلت ہے ۔ خاتمیت زمانی کا منکر کافر ہے -------------------------------- مولانا نانوتویؒ لکھتے ہیں :۔ ’’ سو اگر اطلاق اور عموم ہے تب تو ثبوت خاتمیت زمانی ظاہر ہے ورنہ تسلیم لزوم خاتمیت زمانی بدلالت التزامی ضرور ثابت ہے اور تصریحات نبوی مثل [انت منی بمنزلۃ ہارون لموسیٰ الا أنہ لا نبی بعدي اوکما قال] جو بظاہر بطرز مذکور اسی لفظ خاتم النبیین سے ماخوذ ہے اس باب میں کافی ہے کیونکہ یہ مضمون درجہ تواتر کو پہنچ گیا ہے پھر اسی پر اجماع بھی منعقد ہوگیا گو الفاظ مذکور بسند تواتر منقول نہ ہوں سو یہ عدمِ تواتر الفاظ باوجود تواتر معنوی یہاں ایسا ہی ہوگا جیسا تواتر اعداد رکعات فرائض ووتر وغیرہ ، باوجودیکہ الفاظ حدیث مشعر تعداد رکعات متواتر نہیں جیسا اس کا منکر کافر ہے ایسا ہی اس کا منکر بھی کافر ہوگا اب دیکھیے کہ اس صورت میں عطف بین الجملتین اور استدراک اور استثناء مذکور بھی بغایت درجہ چسپاں نظر آتا ہے اور خاتمیت بھی بوجہ احسن ثابت ہوتی ہے اور خاتمیت زمانی بھی ہاتھ سے نہیں جاتی‘‘۔ (تحذیر الناس ، صفحہ 12 و 13 ، دار الاشاعت کراچی) اس عبارت میں مولانا نے ختم نبوت زمانی کو نہ صرف یہ کہ منطقی دلیل ہی سے تسلیم کیا ہے بلکہ وہ فرماتے ہیں کہ ختم نبوت زمانی لفظ خاتم النبیین سے ثابت ہے جو قرآن میں موجود ہے اور حدیث شریف اور اجماع امت سے بھی ثابت ہے اور جس طرح فرائض وغیرہ کی رکعات کی تعداد کا منکر کافر ہے اسی طرح ختم نبوت زمانی کا منکر بھی کافر ہے ۔ اور مناظرہ عجیبہ میں ہے:۔ ’’بلکہ اس سے بڑھ کر لیجیے (تحذیر الناس کے) صفحہ نہم کی سطر دہم سے لیکر صفحہ دہم کی سطر ہفتم تک وہ تقریر لکھی ہے جس سے خاتمیت زمانی اور خاتمیت مکانی اور خاتمیت مرتبی تینوں بدلالت مطابقی ثابت ہوجائیں اور اسی تقریر کو اپنا مختار بتایا ہے‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ، صفحہ 70 ، مکتبہ قاسم العلوم کراچی ) پھر یہ بھی لکھا:۔ ’’اگر خاتم کو مطلق رکھیے تو پھر خاتمیت مرتبی اور خاتمیت زمانی اور خاتمیت مکانی تینوں اس سے اسی طرح ثابت ہو جائیں گے جس طرح آیت ’’انما الخمر والمیسر والانصاب رجس من عمل الشیطان‘‘میں لفظ رجس سے نجاست معنوی اور نجاست ظاہری دونوں ثابت ہوتی ہیںاور اس ایک مفہوم کا انواع مختلفہ پر محمول ہونا ظاہر ہوتا ہے‘‘ ۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ، صفحہ 53) اور آگے لکھا:۔ ’’بالجملہ جیسے اخبار قیام ِ زید وعمرو مخالف ومعارض قیام زید نہیں بلکہ مع شیء زائد اس کی تصدیق ہے ، ایسے ہی اس صورت میں میری تفسیر مع شیء زائد مصدقِ تفسیر مفسران گذشتہ ہوگی نہ مخالف اورمعارض‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ، صفحہ 53) پھر لکھا :۔ ’’ اور سنیے آپ خاتمیت زمانی کو معنی مجمع علیہ فرماتے ہیں اگر یہ مطلب ہے کہ خاتمیت زمانی مجمع علیہ ہے خاتم النبیین سے ماخوذ ہو یا کہیں اور سے تو اس میں انکار ہی کسے ہے، اور اگر یہ مطلب ہے کہ لفظ خاتم النبیین سے مراد ہونا مجمع علیہ ہے تو اس میں ہمارا کیا نقصان ہے جو یہ آپ پردہ میں آوازہ خرقِ اجماع کستے ہیں ، تحذیر (یعنی تحذیر الناس ۔ ناقل) کو غور سے دیکھا ہوتا تو اس میں خود موجود ہے کہ لفظ خاتم تینوں معنوں پر (یعنی خاتمیت زمانی، مرتبی اور مکانی ۔ ناقل) بدلالت مطابقی دلالت کرتا ہے اور اسی کو اپنا مختار قرار دیا تھا…‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ، صفحہ 115) معلو م ہوا کہ مولانا تو خاتمیت زمانی ومرتبی بلکہ مکانی کو بھی آیت خاتم النبیین سے ثابت فرمارہے ہیں ۔ اور یہ بیان فرمانا چاہ رہے ہیں کہ عام طور پر آیت خاتم النبیین سے صرف آنحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم کی ختم نبوت زمانی ہی ثابت کی جاتی ہے ،جبکہ میرے نزدیک اس آیت سے ختم نبوت مرتبی اور زمانی دونوں بلکہ ایک تیسری قسم ختم نبوت مکانی بھی ثابت ہوتی ہیں ۔ یہ ہے وہ فرق جس سے کچھ لوگوں نے یہ سمجھ لیا کہ مولانا نے گذشتہ مفسرین کی تفسیر کے خلاف تفسیر کی ہے ، جبکہ حقیقت یہ ہے کہ مولانا نے مفسرین سابقین کی تفسیر کو قبول کرتے ہوئے ختم نبوت مرتبی ومکانی کا ایک اضافی نکتہ بیان فرما یا ہے ۔ قارئین محترم! ہم نے شروع میں عرض کیا تھا کہ عدل وانصاف کا تقاضا یہ ہے کہ کسی پر الزام لگانے سے پہلے اس کی تمام عبارات وبیانات کو پڑھا اور سمجھا جائے ، اگر اس نے اپنی کسی بات کی تشریح وتوضیح خود کی ہے تو اسے قبول کیا جائے ، یہ ہرگز انصاف نہیں کہ کسی کی بات کو سیاق وسباق سے کاٹ کر ، یا شرط کو جزا سے ، اور جزا کو شرط سے کاٹ کر، ایک فقرہ ایک صفحے سے لے کر اور دوسرا فقرہ کسی اور صفحے سے لے کر خود ایک عبارت ترتیب دے کر اس پر فتوی لگا دیا جائے ۔ انصاف تو یہ تھا کہ جب مولانا قاسم نانوتوی رحمۃ اللہ علیہ نے خود فرمادیا کہ: ’’اپنا دین وایمان ہے کہ بعد رسول اللہ صلى الله عليه وسلم کسی اورنبی کے ہونے کا احتمال نہیں جو اس میں تأمل کرے اسے کافر سمجھتا ہوں‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ ، صفحہ 144، مکتبہ قاسم العلوم ، کورنگی ، کراچی) تو پھر نہ کسی الزام کی گنجائش نظر آتی ہے اور نہ کسی اعتراض کی ۔ فیصلہ کن بات ------------------- جہاں تک میرے ان کرم فرماؤں کا تعلق ہے جو اپنے آپ کو "مجاہدین ختم نبوت" بھی کہتے ہیں اور پھر آنکھ بند کرکے مکھی پر مکھی مارتے ہوے یہ نعرے لگاتے ہیں کہ مولانا محمد قاسم نانوتوى رحمه الله ختم نبوت زمانی کے منکر تھے اور وہ اجراء نبوت کا عقیدہ رکھتے تھے ان کی خدمت میں عرض ہے کہ الله سے ڈریں، صرف اپنے مسلکی تعصب کی وجہ سے انصاف کا خون نہ کریں، اور مولانا کے یہ الفاظ پڑھیں : ’’اپنا دین وایمان ہے کہ بعد رسول اللہ صلى الله عليه وسلم کسی اورنبی کے ہونے کا احتمال نہیں جو اس میں تأمل کرے اسے کافر سمجھتا ہوں‘‘۔ (مناظرہ عجیبہ ، صفحہ 144، مکتبہ قاسم العلوم ، کورنگی ، کراچی) ... جب خود مولانا نے واضح الفاظ میں اپنا عقیدہ بیان فرما دیا تو پھر آپ کو کیا حق پہنچتا ہے کہ کفر کے فتووں کی توپیں چلاتے جائیں؟ دنیا کا وہ کونسا مفتی ہے جو ایسے آدمی پر منکر ختم نبوت ہونے کا فتویٰ صادر کرے جو صاف اور واضح الفاظ میں اقرار کرے کہ ’’اپنا دین وایمان ہے کہ بعد رسول اللہ صلى الله عليه وسلم کسی اورنبی کے ہونے کا احتمال نہیں جو اس میں تأمل کرے اسے کافر سمجھتا ہوں‘‘؟؟ نیز مکتب دیوبند کے ہزاروں لاکھوں علماء و مفتیان کرام ہوے ، آج بھی ان کے دار الافتاء موجود ہیں، کیا کسی ایک مفتی یا کسی ایک عالم نے یہ فتویٰ دیا کہ "انحضرت صلى الله عليه وسلم کے بعد نبوت جاری ہے؟"؟ کیا علماء دیوبند منکر ختم نبوت کو کافر نہیں کہتے؟ کیا عالمی مجلس تحفظ ختم نبوت نامی تنظیم اسی مکتب دیوبند سے منسلک نہیں؟ کیا علماء دیوبند کا رد قادیانیت پر لٹریچر موجود نہیں؟ تو پھر کتنی نہ انصافی ہے کہ بیک جنبش قلم لکھ دیا جائے کہ "مکتب دیوبند والے تو ختم نبوت کے منکر ہیں"؟؟؟؟ اعدلوا هو اقرب للتقوى . (حافظ عبيد اللہ۔
  23. DEOBANDIYON NE JO GALAT MATLAB LIYA USKA KA JAWAB . Deobandi kehte hain ki - Barelviyo Ne Khud Apni Jahalat Ka Iqrar Kiya Aur Deoband Ki Shan Bayan Ki . Mufti Ahmed Yaar Khan Naeemi Rahmatullah Ta'ala Alaihe Ne Diwane Shalik Me Likha Ki - . Ahle Sunnat Wale Kawwali Va Urs Karte Hain Aur Deoband Wale Kitabe Likhte Hain Aur Dars Karte Hain . Humara Paisa Qabron Aur Khankhao Par Lagta Hai Aur Deoband Nazdi Ka Paisa Ilm Wa Madaris Par Lagta Hai ! . Al Jawab = Yaha Par Deobandiyon Ne Ghuma Firake Ibarat Ko Deobandi Ki Tareef Sabit Karne Ki Na Kaam Koshish Ki Hai . Allama Mufti Ahmed Yaar Khan Naeemi Rahmatullah Ta'ala Alaihe Ki Jo Ibarat Deobandiyon Ne Nakal Ki Hai Is Me To Wo Baaz Diwane Kam Ilm Logo Ka Fehal Ka Radd Kar Rahe Hain . Jo Paise Jaha Kharch Karna Chaiye Waha Nahi Karte . Kya Deobandi Apne Maslak Ke Kam Ilm Logo Ka Rona Nahi Rote?? . Balki Har Maslak Wala Rota Hai . Allama Mufti Ahmed Yaar Khan Naeemi Rahmatullah Ta'ala Alaihe Ke In Aqwal Hi Se Deobandiyon Ka Radd Ho Gaya Ki Barelvi Aulma Apna Pet Palne Ki Wajah Se Aise Fehal Karne Ko Kehtey Hain . Jabki Yaha Mufti Ahmed Yaar Khan Naeemi Rahmatullah Ta'ala Alaihe Ne Paisa Qabron Aur Khankhao Par Kharch Karne Par Tanbiya Tanz Ki Hai Aur Deobandiyon Ka Mazajan Itlaq Kiya Hai Taki Kam Ilm Ye Samjhe Ki Deobandiyon Ne Hum Se Sabkat Pa Li Aur sahi Jagah Par Apna Paisa Kharch Karna Suru Kar Den . Lekin Deobandi Jahil Awaam Ne Ise Deoband Ki Tareef Par Mamool Kar Liya . Jis Se Sabit Hua Ke Aulma Ahle Sunnat Huq Baat Karte Hain Aur Kam Ilm Aur Diwane Logo Ko Bhi Quran o Sunnat Ki Sahi Talimat Detey Hain . Deobandyon Ki Tarah Nahi Ki Apne Molviyon Ki Kufriya Ibarat Par Farda Dhalte Dhalte Aur Baatil Taweelat Karte Karte Mar Gaye Aur Apne Maslak Ke Logo Ko Bhi Andhere Me Rakha Aur In Par Ye Zahir Kiya Ki Ye Koi Gustakiyan Nahi Balki Tazeem E Mustafa Sallallahu Ta'ala Alaihe Wa Sallam Hai . Maaz Allah Ashtaqfirullah Wala Aula Kuwata Illah Billah Ali Ul Azeem . Note - Deobandiyon Ne Khud Ko Yaha Nazdi Tasleem Kar Liya Hai By - Saife Raza Sunni . ======
  24. صابی تو یہ بھی تھے عبدالرحمن بن عدیسؓ : یہ اصحاب بیعت شجرہ میں سے ہیں اور قرطبی کے بقول مصر میں حضرت عثمان ؓکے خلاف بغاوت کرنے والو ں کے لیڈر تھے یہاں تک کہ حضرت عثمانؓ کو قتل کر ڈالا . ﴿استیعاب ۲: ۳۸۳؛ اور صحابی تو یہ بھی ہیں الدارقُطنی کہتے ہیں أَبُو الغَادِيَة، يَسَار بْن سَبع، لَهُ صُحْبَة، رَوَى عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ، وَهُوَ قَاتِلُ عَمَّارَ بْن يَاسِر، رَحِمَهُ اللهُ، بِصِفِّين. ابوالغادیہ یَسار بن سَبع صحابی تھا، اس نے نبی کریم صل اللہ علیہ وآلہ وسلم سے حدیث بھی روایت کی ہے، وہ عمار بن یاسرؓ کا قاتل تھا جنگِ صِفِّین میں۔ (موسوعة أقوال أبي الحسن الدارقطني: 2/ 724/ 3938 ابن عبدالبر (م463ھ) لکھتے ہیں أَبُو الغَادِيَة الجُهَنِي. أَدْرَكَ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ وَهُوَ غُلَامٌ، وَلَهُ سَمَاع مِنَ النَّبِيّ ﷺ، وَهُوَ قَاتِلُ عَمّارَ بْن يَاسِر. ابوالغادیہ الجُہَنی ، اس نے نبی اکرم ص کو پایا ہے جبکہ یہ نوجوان تھا، اور اس نے نبی پاک ص سے حدیث کی سماعت بھی کی ہے، اور یہ عمار بن یاسرؓ کا قاتل ہے۔ (الاستيعاب لابن عبد البر: 4/ 1725/ 3113) الذہبی (م748ھ) لکھتے ہیں أَبُو الغَادِيَة الجُهَني: يَسَار بْن سَبُع، لَهُ صُحْبَة، وَهُوَ قَاتِلُ عَمَّار. ابوالغادیہ الجُہَنی یَسار بن سَبع صحابی تھا، اور وہ عمار کا قاتل تھا۔ (المقتنى في سرد الكنى لِلذهبي: 2/ 3/ 4885)
  25. کوئی اور فضیلت مانے یا نہ مانے کوئی لیکن ان کی یہ فضیلت کافی ہے کے نبی پاک صلی الله علیہ وآکہ وسلم کے صحابی ہیں۔۔۔ اور ابن تیمیہ کی یہ بات بلکل غلط ہے۔۔۔ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  1. Load more activity