Saeedi

Mr Deo bandi.

    I have read all your points which are neither new nor astonishing. You know very well that I have rectified a mistake of Qadri sb about conditional divorce. You should not insist on that.

    I have told that Divorce of Deobandi rudes is not our desire ,we wish their return to ISLAM. When we do not beleive in their marriages, then it is a vague practice to impose divorce condition on them.

    ISHARAT E FAREEDI (Maqabees ul majalis) is not written by Khawaja Ghulam Fareed. His words have been claimed to be collected by an unauthenticated person, Mr Rukn E Deen,who entered bogus letters in that book in favour of Qadianis from Khawja sb to Mirza qadiani.So that book is not authenticated book in our view.Further more Speaker or Writer of ISHARAAT, no one, is affiliated to Imam Ahmed Riza Khan Barelvi. WHEN deobandi beleive that book ISHARAAT is all by Khawaja Ghulam Fareed AND beleive that refuters of Khawja are Yezid pleed.THEN it must be concluded that Isharat e fareedi is deobandis book. OK!!!
    I have avoided a non-quranic condition of divorce. Is their any example of conditioned divorce by Sahaba Kiraam or their followers. If answer is YES, then give me reference I will follow that against Deobandi Kufriyat. Othewise avoid such NON-SUNNAT divorce sentences .
    Which references have been proved WRONG?  please ! repeat again . Just your denial is not sufficient.Do you know at which forum you are talking? Please! talk with proofs otherwise you will have to face a more shameful future.
    ALLAMA KAZMIs book is reflecting the dark beliefs of deobandis. Some KUFRs and some ZALALATs are in disputed sentences of deobandis as have been shown and proved by Eminent Allama Kazmi.If some deobandis are ignorant from those sentences then they are not KAFIRs.BUT term deobandi is specific for RUDEs and incidence of ignorants is not considered in term Deobandi .ALLAMA does not support your negative conclusions .
    YOU do not differentiate between LUZOOM and ILTEZAM. Imam Ahmed Riza proved LUZOOM E KUFR of Ismaeel dehlvi,but he did not find ILTEZAM E KUFR by Ismaeel dehlvi.Many factors constitute or refute ILTEZAM and touba is one of those.The rumour of his touba was existing as mentioned in a question of Fatawa Rasheedia, though he did not accept that.Imam Ahmed Riza did not need to mention details of ADM E ILTEZAM of Ismaeel dehlvi.
    I have written analysis of your answers and objections in detail in INPAGE which you are trying to set aside.Consequently I had to write in notepad for your availability there. Please answer my detailed analysis in this topic elaborated in INPAGE.
     I know that you will beat about the bush and will pass time by irrelevant talk but will not talk with sense about the kufriyat of your ARBAB UM MIN DOON ILLAH.

faisi wahabi ka jawab