Can you please make a distinction between deobandi's, because as far as I'm aware there are many kinds of deobandi's, such as hayaati's and maamati's.
And I don't think all the deobandi's believe in what is mentioned in your provided attachment. So we shouldn't label all the deobandi's as kafir's, but say that those who have this particular aqeedah is a kafir. I am recently studying the tafsir of Quran (Zia-ul-Quran) by Hazrat Peer Muhammad karam shah, and although he refutes the claims of deobandi's, but doesn't label them as kafirs out-right. He would talk about a particular aqeedah and mention if someone has this belief is a kafir. Thats how it should be. We should all be very careful in using this kafir word. Because these common deobandis might not have these aqaid and might not even be aware that their ulama's have/had such aqaid...
For e.g in the attachment it is mentioned that Ismael dehlvi said, that Prophet Muhammad , peace be upon him, have died and turned to dust, Astaghfirullah, but if I am not wrong Hayaati's don't believe in that, which is a majority chunk of deobandi's.
I hope you understand what I am trying to say... Because if every deobandi believes whatever is mentioned in the attachment, a Muslim with Iman equal to seed a would know, they're kafir. But I'm not sure if thats the case.
And if there is any deobandi on this forum, can s/he enlighten me, do they really believe in all that?
Anyway, I'm new to this forum, so to all....
Free DictionaryWikipediaDictionaryGoogle defineWordNetWictionaryUrban Dictionary<>0fwdgovu