Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MuhammedAli

Second Principle Of Qawa’D Al Arba And It’S Destructive Fruits.

1 post in this topic

Introduction:

Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab’s purpose according to the first and the second principle was to establish a common connection between the beliefs of Mushrikeen of Arabian Peninsula and the Muslims of his own era. Then using Khariji methodology interpret verses of Quran which were about polytheists in such a fashion that they seem to represent the creed of Muslims. With this he laid the foundation of justification of Takfir (i.e. declaring Muslims as polytheistic Kafirs) and murder of Muslims.

Belief Of Muslims Regarding Intercession & Intermediation:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) intercedes to Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) if he notes sin of a Muslim asking Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) to forgive the sins, established from this Hadith: “Bakr bin ‘Abdullah also reported that the Holy said: My life is a great good for you in whom you talk (to me) and you are responded. And when I will die my demise will be a great good for you. Your deeds will be presented to me, if I see goodness, I will praise Allah, and if I see wrongs, I will ask Allah’s forgiveness for you."[1] The other Ahadith establish that it is recommended to ask servants of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) in time of need: “Allah has angels on the earth - other than the [two] record-keepers - who keep a record [even] of the leaves that fall on the ground. Therefore, if one of you is crippled in a deserted land where no-one is in sight, let him cry out: Help O servants of Allah [Ref: Majma az Zawaid, Vol10, H17104] Imam Baihaqi (rahimullah alayhi ta’ala) writes: “Abdullah bin Ahmed bin Hanbal (rah) said that he heard his father (Imam Ahmed) who said: I performed Hajj 5 times, thrice on foot and twice on ride or he said thrice on ride and twice on foot, once when I was on foot I lost my way hence I started to exclaim this: O Allah’s servants show me the way I kept on repeating this until I came back on track.”[2] [Ref: Shu’ayb ul Iman, Vol6, P128, H7697] Of course asking the servants of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is not with belief they are gods or partners of God but as servants whom Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) has granted the means to help the Saliheen. Hadith Qudsi records that Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) becomes metaphorically speaking hands, feet, eyes ears, of His Awliyah, which implies that He grants them supernatural powers of granting, travelling, seeing, hearing: “And the most beloved things with which My slave comes nearer to Me, is what I have enjoined upon him; and My slave keeps on coming closer to Me through performing Nawafil till I love him, so I become his sense of hearing with which he hears, and his sense of sight with which he sees, and his hand with which he grips, and his leg with which he walks; and if he asks Me, I will give him, and if he asks My protection, …" [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H509] These Awliyah-Allah provide help to those who need it in the time of their need, with permission of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and to those whom Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is pleased with.

Ibnul Wahhab’s Objective In Writing Second Principle:

According to Wahhabism seeking intermediation of RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and Awliyah of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is [major] Shirk. Hence to establish as [major] Shirk of Muslims Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab in the first principle of Qawa’id Al Arba it is writes: “That you know the disbelievers (i.e. Kufar) who the Messenger fought used to affirm that Allah (ta’aala) was the Creator and the Disposer of all the affairs but that didn’t enter them into Islam and the proof is the saying of the Most High:…” Also Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab wrote; That they say: We do not call upon and turn towards them except to seek nearness and intercession. So the proof against seeking this nearness (through others like Awliyah) is the saying of the Most High: …”After which he proceeded to quote verse [39:3] which was revealed for the disbelievers Arabia who lived in the time of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). From this we gather the words; “That they say: We do not call upon …” mean; they the disbelieving polytheists say that we do not call upon except to seek nearness and intercession. Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab is implying that those Muslims who believe in Tawassul/Waseela (i.e. intermediation) of Awliyah-Allah are like the disbelieving polytheists. Note he also wrote that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) fought the disbelievers to implant the idea in the readers to mind; it is permissible to declare war on those Muslims who are Mushrikeen according toMuhammad bin Abdul Wahhab’s methodology.

The Genesis Of Edicts Of Kufr Upon Muslims:

Khawarij were from earliest sects to leave the fold of Islam. The following Hadith puts their methodology in perspective:“... and the Mulhidun (heretical) after the establishment of firm proof against them: "And the statement of Allah: 'Allah will not mislead a people after He has guided them, until He makes clear to them what to avoid.' [9:115] And Ibn Umar used to consider them (the Khawarij and the Mulhidun) the worst of Allah's creatures and said: These people took some verses that had been revealed concerning the disbelievers and interpreted them as describing the believers.” [Ref: Bukhari, Volume 9, Page 49, Chapter 6: Qatal Al Khawarij] This Hadith establishes central to Khariji methodology is to interpret verses which were revealed regarding disbelievers in such a fashion that they seemingly represent the creed of Muslims. What the Hadith omits is, after utilizing such a verse and interpreting in this fashion; the Khawarij accused the Muslims of being disbelievers on account outwardly similarity.[3] Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab revived this apostate group’s central misguided teachings of Shirk[4] and utilized the methodology of apostate sect to justify the evictions of Muslims from Islam and their killing.

Wahhabi’s Believe Muslims Are Kafir:

The Muslims have always believed in Tawassul/Shaf’at of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and the Awliyah-Allah but heretical Khariji elements originated in Najd who based on misinterpretation Quranic verses labeled Muslims as disbelievers and permitted the killing of Muslims. Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab was the leaders of these lunatics. He considered Muslims who practiced Tawassul of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and Tawassul of Awliyah-Allah as polytheists – Kafir. He waged relentless armed campaign against the Muslims of Arabian Peninsula on the pretext that Sunni Muslims are Mushrikeen – Kafir. His bandits practiced wholesale killing of Sunni’s men, women, children and pillaged villages, towns and cities and raped thousands of Muslim women. All this slaughter, rape, pillaging was carried out in effort to forcibly convert the Sunni population to Wahhabism.

Wahhabi Excuse Muslims Have Fallen Into Shirk:

When it is pointed out to Wahhabi’s that you accuse Muslims of being polytheistic Kafirs and your sect teaches it is permissible to kill Muslims. They argue that Muslims had/have fallen into major Shirk hence they had/have become polytheistic disbelievers and therefore it was/is permissible to kill those people.

Muslim Ummah Protected From Shirk:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said: “Verily, the Satan has lost all hopes that the worshippers would ever worship (him) in the peninsula of Arabia, but he (is hopeful) that he would sow the seed of dissension amongst them." [Ref: Muslim, B39, H6752] Similar Hadith is found else where: “Satan has despaired of ever being worshipping in this land of yours, but he will be obeyed in some matters which you regard as insignificant, and he will be content with that.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol.1, B25, H3055] Hadith has to be understood in the light of following verse of the Quran: “(The polytheists) leaving Him call but upon goddesses: They call but upon Satan the persistent rebel!” [Ref: 4:117] In the language of the Quran calling upon other gods/goddesses besides Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is akin to calling upon Satan. Therefore the hadith means that Satan has lost all hopes of worshippers of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) would ever worship idols in Arabian Peninsula.[5] In another Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said regarding his Ummah: “By Allah! I am not afraid that you will associate with Allah after my death, but I am afraid that you will compete with one another for the worldly things." [Ref: Bukhari, B23, H428] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “The thing that I fear most for my nation is associating others with Allah. I do not say that they will worship the sun or the moon or idols, but deeds done for the sake of anyone other than Allah, and hidden desires.” [Ref: Ibn Majah, Vol.1 B37, H4205] Therefore the charge of Muslims taking Awliyah-Allah as idol-gods and intercessors, besides Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and worshipping them to gain nearness of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is false.

Takfir Of Muslims Returns To Those Who Make Takfir:

Those who accuse Muslims of worshiping others besides Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) in reality accuse Muslims of being polytheists. Major Shirk is more serious offense then Kufr and worshiping others beside Allah is major Shirk. Therefore denouncing Muslims as polytheists is worse then calling them disbelievers. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) has told that one who calls his brother surely one of them is: "If a man says to his brother: ‘O Kafir!’ Then surely one of them is such.” [Ref: Bukhari, B73, H125] Quoted Hadith is further explained by another: “Any person who calls his brother: O Unbeliever! (then the truth of this label) would return to one of them. If it is true, (then it is) as he asserted, (but if it is not true), then it returns to him (and thus the person who made the accusation is an Unbeliever).” [Ref: Muslim, B1, H117] With so much difference of belief as well as practice between Muslims and Mushrikeen could there be a justifiable reason for declaring a Muslim to be polytheistic Kafir! One may want to argue, remember Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) has foretold that his Ummah [as whole] will remain free from [major] Shirk.

Killing Of Muslims Without Jusitiable Reason:

It has been established from the Ahadith that Ummah of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) will remain free from [major] Shirk and as long as the Muslims remain upon Arabian Peninsula the Shirk will not return to it. Hence Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab’s charge that Muslims of Arabian Peninsula had fallen into [major] Shirk was unwarranted and his legalizing the spilling of blood of Muslims was illegal in religion of Islam.

The Impermissibility Of Killing A Muslim:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said: "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims." [Ref: Bukhari, B83, H17] In another Hadith is is recorded that Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is said: "The most hated persons to Allah are three: (1) A person who deviates from the right conduct in the Haram (i.e. sanctuaries of Mecca and Medina); (2) a person who seeks that the traditions of the pre-lslamic period of ignorance, should remain in Islam (3) and a person who seeks to shed somebody's blood without any right." [Ref: Bukhari, B83, H21] Note out of most hated persons by Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is one who seeks to kill a Muslim. Then how much hated would a person be one who kills a Muslim intentionally? Another narration records words of Mother of Momineen Hadhrat Aysha (radiallah ta’ala anha), she said: “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim except in three cases: An adulterer who had been married, who should be stoned to death; a man who killed another man intentionally, who should be killed; and a man who left Islam and waged war against Allah, the Might and Sublime, and His Messenger, who should be killed, or crucified, or banished from the land." [Ref: Nisa’i, Vol5, B37, H4023] Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his followers have declared the Muslims, the Sawad Al Azam (i.e. greath majority), the Jammah (i.e. the Group) as Kafir idol worshipers and on this pretext legalized the killing of Muslims. He with his minions made Halal the blood of Muslims which Messenger (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) declared to be Haram.[6]

The Serious Offense Of Killing a Muslim:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) sent a expedition against the tribe of Juhaina. In the morning the expedition attacked the enemy and routed them from battle field. Two companions chased a individual and when they caught up to him he recited; “There is no god except Allah.” This was indication that he had accepted Islam therefore killing him was impermissible but one companion thinking the man has faked his conversion on pain of death stabbed him to death with his spear. The news reached Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and he said to this companion: "O Usama! You killed him after he had said, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah?"' The companion replied: "O Allah's Apostle! He said so in order to save himself." Then Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said: "You killed him after he had said, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah." The Hadith further records: “The Prophet kept on repeating that statement till I wished I had not been a Muslim before that day.” [Ref: Bukhari, B80, H11] Note one individual who recited one aspect of confession and Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) disapproved it so much that his constant repetition made companion feel that he wished he wasn’t Muslim. Meaning Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) made him feel so guilty of his action that he was ashamed of being a Muslim. Killing a Muslim who recites confession of creed, performs prayers, fasts every year, goes for Hajj, Umrah, celebrates the Eid, recites the Quran, partakes in funeral prayers, loves Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala), loves His Messenger (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam), hurts when a Muslim is hurt and does what Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and his Messenger (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) instructed in Islam. Imagine how Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) would react to Wahhabi’s killing Muslims. Would he be pleased with them or order them to be put to sword for killing Muslims?[7]

Killing A Muslim Is Kufr And Killer Is Apostate:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) stated to kill a Muslim is Kufr and to abuse him with foul words is Fisq: “Narrated 'Abdullah: Allah's Apostle said, "Abusing a Muslim is Fusuq (i.e., an evil-doing), and killing him is Kufr (disbelief)." [Ref: Bukhari, B73, H70] In another Hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said: “The Prophet said to me during Hajjat-al-Wida': Let the people keep quiet and listen. Then he said (addressing the people), "Do not revert to disbelief after me by striking the necks of one another (with swords)." [Ref: Bukhari, B3, H122] This establishes that killing a Muslim is Kufr which invalidates one’s Islam and person becomes apostate. Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) states: "Anyone who kills a believer deliberately will receive as his reward (a sentence) to live in Hell for ever. God will be angry with him and curse him, and prepare dreadful torment for him." [Ref: 4:93] Kafirs, will be in hell fire for eternity, and anyone who kills a Muslim is Kafir hence he will burn in hell for eternity with the disbelievers.

Best Of Speech And Best Of Guidance:

Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “The best of the speech is embodied in the Book of Allah, and the best of the guidance is the guidance given by Muhammad. And the most evil affairs are their innovations; and every innovation is error." [Ref: Muslim, B4, H1885] In another hadith Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) said: “The worst of things are those that are newly invented; every newly-invented thing is an innovation and every innovation is misguidance, and every misguidance leads in the Fire.” [Ref: Nisa’i, B19, H1579] The belief that, Muslim Ummah has fallen into Shirk was introduced by Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and this is a innovation, which leads to the fire. Those who believe in it, defend it, promote it are the people of hell because they have chosen a religion other then the religion of Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). They have chosen a path other then the straight path taught by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and those who oppose Messenger of Allah (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) after guidance has been conveyed to them they are people of hell: "Whoever opposes the Messenger after clear guidance has been conveyed to them and follows a way other than the believers then We shall entrust him to what he has turned to and land him in Hell, what an evil refuge" [Ref: 4:115]

Conclusion:

Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab’s second principle contradicts the established beliefs of Quran and Sunnah. The principle is geared toward programing the readers to consider the Muslims as Mushrikeen and engage in fighting and killing Muslims. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) had expressed in no uncertain terms that his Ummah will remain free from [major] Shirk. Also Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) forbade the killing of Muslims and declared it to be Kufr and act of apostasy. Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, his immediate and his modern followers, all declare that vast majority of Muslims are upon [major] Shirk and as such fighting and killing them is permissible. Their beliefs are contradicting the teaching Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). We the Muslims believe in Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) as are God and Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) as the Last, Finale of Prophets. We believe in the guidance of our Rabb and teaching of our Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) and one who abandons them has abandoned Islam. We are not from them nor they are from us and we the Muslims thank and praise Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) for guarding our Islam and making us Muslims. Their act of declaring Muslims as polytheists and their slaughter of Muslims is enough evidence for their renegation from Islam. All praises belong to Allah the Rabb of Alameen.

Footnotes:

- [1] Ibn Sa‘d, at-Tabaqat-ul-kubra (2: 194); ‘Ali bin Abu Bakr Haythami related in Majma‘-uz-zawa’id (9:24) 2nd) Narrated by Ibn Hajar ‘Asqalani, through Harith in his al-Matalib-ul-Aliyah, 4: 22-3 #3853.

- [2] These three narrations to establish that scholars preceding the modern Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat have narrated texts which establish Tawassul/Waseela of Awliyah-Allah and Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). If Waseela/Tawassul was such an issue of [major] Shirk these Ulamah would have out right rejected these narrations stating these narrations contradict Tawheed. In fact no one would have even narrated these traditions, classifying these traditions and criticizing their Isnad (i.e. chain of narrators) as well as interpreting the Matan (i.e. text) would be too much to get involved in. How many fabricated Ahadith are narrated which instruct worship of Al-Lat or Al-Uzza and why not? Not one, because any narration which contradicts teaching of Tawheed the Scholars would have dismissed it based on the text of Hadith, without getting involved into criticism of narrating chain. No scholar has ever stated these Ahadith are teaching polytheism or they contradict Tawheed. This is sufficient to establish Scholars of Islam never considered Tawassul of deceased as Shirk. People like Ibn Taymiyyah and his equally rabid student Ibn Qayyim Al Jawziyyah may have been only individuals whom might have classed these Ahadith as teaching Shirk. In the truest sense Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and his minions of Shaytan started the innovation of stating these Ahadith contradict Tawheed.

- [3] Excellent example of how this outwardly similarity being utilized to demonize the Muslims as Kafirs is demonstrated by Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab in the first principle of Qawa’id Al Arba. The Muslims ask the servants of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) in other words Awliyah-Allah to help them in time of need as instructed by the Ahadith of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). In context of this practice Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab quoted the following verse: “And those who you take Awliyah besides Him (they say): ‘We worship them only that they may bring us near to Allah.” [Ref: 39:3] Firstly, quoting this verse creates a false parallel between the belief of Muslims and Mushrikeen. It insinuates to the readers that Muslims worship the Awliyah-Allah like the Mushrikeen worshiped their Awliyah. Note Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab defined the act of asking of help from Awliyah-Allah as a act of worship. In other words if a Muslim was to ask for help of servants of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) saying; ‘Ya RasoolAllah (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) help me!’ or say; ‘O Servants Of Allah help me.’, then according to Wahhabism, the Muslims has worshipped the one whom he has sought help from. Therefore what is insinuated from principle is the belief of Wahhabis and it is not an assumption. Secondly, the Khawarij interpret the Quranic verses independently of other verses of Quran which are on same topic. Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab ignored the following verses: “Then why did those they took besides Allah as gods by which to approach [Him] not aid them? But they had strayed from them. And that was their falsehood and what they were inventing.” [Ref: 46:28] This verse reveals that polytheistic Kafirs took their gods as means to get close to Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and on the judgment day these gods would abandon them. Fact established is, the verse was about polytheists who took their idols as gods and believed these idol-gods will get them closer to Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) if they worship them. Yet we the Muslims worship none but Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) and invoke no other god except Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala). We Muslims do not ask help from Awliyah-Allah of our own accord but do what was commanded to us by our Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam). Following verse was revealed regarding the Awliyah of Muslims: “Your Wali is none but Allah and His Messenger and those who have believed - those who establish prayer and give zakah, and they bow [in worship].” [Ref: 5:55] About these Awliyah-Allah [singular; Wali, plural; Awliyah] Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) grants super natural powers: “… My slave keeps on coming closer to Me through performing Nawafil till I love him, so I become his sense of hearing with which he hears, and his sense of sight with which he sees, and his hand with which he grips, and his leg with which he walks; and if he asks Me, I will give him, and if he asks My protection, …" [Ref: Bukhari, B76, H509] Where as the Awliyah of polytheists Allah (subhanhu wa ta’ala) states saying to polytheists: “And do not invoke besides Allah [idol-god intercessors] that which neither benefits you nor harms you, for if you did, then indeed you would be of the wrongdoers.'" [Ref: 10:106] How can the Awliyah-Allah of Muslims and Awliyah of polytheists be counted as one and the same by a just, a true, and a Muslim, when they are worlds apart? This reveals how the Khawarij and Wahhabi’s use ambiguity in verses to implicate Muslims into [major] Shirk of polytheists and how interpreting Quran with Quran can check-mate their heretical beliefs.

- [4] The Khariji methodology of Shirk was simple and straight forward. If a action/belief of Muslim had any resemblance to a Kafir’s action/belief even in Zahir (i.e. apparent, outward) form then Muslim was Kafir/Mushrik. Or if a Muslim gave attribute of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) to a creation even in outwardly then Muslim is guilty of [major] Shirk hence a Mushrik/Kafir. The example of first is; 1) Hindu prostrates to an Idol, Hindu is Mushrik/Kafir. An ignorant Muslim who has no knowledge of prohibitions of Islam, out of reverence, love, affection prostrates to a grave of Wali, the Khariji would label him to be a Kafir/Mushrik and declare the grave of Wali and maybe even the Wali of Allah to be idol. The Muslims believe prostration of ignorant man would be major sin if he did out of respect and prostration of worship if he believed he was prostrating to his god, hence Kafir/Mushrik. The example of second is best demonstrated when the Khawarij charged Hadhrat Ali (radiallah ta’ala anhu) of committing [major] Shirk because he appointed a Judge between himself and Hadhrat Muawiyah (radiallah ta’ala anhu). The Khawarij charged him of Kufr/Shirk quoting verse of the Quran which stated Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is Judge. The modern Wahhabi’s quote verses which state Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) is Aalim Ul Ghayb (i.e. Knower Of Ghayb) and accuse the Ahle Sunnat of committing Shirk just like their Khariji predecessors.

- [5] The disbelievers may argue; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) foretold the return of Shirk in Arabian Peninsula. The people of Islam say; Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) foretold the Shirk will return in Arabian Peninsula after the blowing of wind which will take the life of all believers and the disbelievers who will survive will revert to religion of their forefathers. This does not contradict the statement of hadith because then the worshipers of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) would be dead. Therefore the worshipers of Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) will not revert to worship of idols on Arabian Peninsula but disbelievers.

- [6] Legalizing the blood of Muslims was a evil and reprehensible innovation which should have been rejected but instead his followers have swallowed the Kufr. Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) is reported to have said: “If somebody innovates something which is not in harmony with the principles of our religion, that thing is rejected." [Ref: Bukhari, B49, H861] Similar Hadith states: “He who did any act for which there is no (explicit or implicit) sanction from our behalf, that is to be rejected.” [Ref: Muslim, B18, H4267] The legalizing of blood of Muslim under the pretext that Muslims are Kafir Mushrikeen was a innovation for which there was no valid proof. One who invents an evil innovation he was warned by Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) with the following words: “And he who introduced some evil practice in Islam which had been followed subsequently (by others), he would be required to bear the burden." [Ref: Muslim, B34, H6466] The word of Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) indicate any murder of Muslim by a Wahhabi, it’s Kufr and the sin of killing a Muslim will be part of the burden which Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab will have to account for on judgment day.

- [7] Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) foretold about the emergence of Wahhabism from Najd in the Hadith. Please read the following articles; 1) ‘The Satan's Group Will Descend From Dhil Khawaisira At-Tamimi.’ 2) ‘Satan's Group Will Emerge East Of Madinah From A Place Called Najd.’ Also Prophet (sallallahu alayhi was’sallam) indeed did instruct the killing of Wahhabi’s and informed that anyone who kills them for them there is reward. If Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) permits separate article will be written establishing this aspect with clear evidences of Ahadith and it will explain why it is permissible to kill them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.