Ameer e Ahlesunnat k ata karda 40 Madani Inamat Bara-e Tulaba ye madani inamat Madani Munnon ko muttaqi banany k liye buhhhht hi Mufeed hain........!! ap b koshish kijiye k ap k ghar ki Madani Munniyan aur Madani Munny in Madani Inamat k aamil banen.......... agr esa hogaya to ap k ghar me b madani mahol bny ga............!!! i'lll upload all pages one by one

bhai.................!!!!

SEVENTEENTH OBJECTION Meelad functions is branded as Haraam because of the following reasons: "The belief that the soul of our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) presents itself at the Meelad function. This factor has already been explained under the section dealing with Qiyaam, and it was shown there how crime of Shirk is resultant on this belief". OUR ANSWER The answer to this objection has already been explained in the section of Qiyaam. It was shown how ignorant Mujlisul Ulema are about the teaching of their own Elders. Alhamdulillah! Thus far, we have answered all the 17 objections of Majlisul Ulema which will provide the reader with the full knowledge of the deception of Majlisul Ulema. Beside these 17 objections there are some other issues which we feel needs to be explained as well. With the Blessings of Allah, we will elaborate on those issues. REPLY TO MAJLISUL ULAMA`S OTHER OBJECTIONS Majlisul Ulema wrote on page 8:- "Ibn Masood (radi Allahu anhu) heard that some people gathered in the Musjid and were reciting `Laa-ilaaha ilallah` and Durood Shareef aloud. He went to them and said: `This (way of recital) was non-existent during the time of the Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). I regard you as innovators.` Ibn Masood (radi Allahu anhu) repeated this over and over until the people were rejected from the musjid". FATAWA QAADHI KHAN It must be noted here that these people were only reciting Laa-ilaaha illallah and Durood Shareef, and both these are acts of Ibaadat of a very high order. Despite this, Hazrat Ibn Masood (radi Allahu anhu) had these people ejected from the musjid and described them as innovators because they were reciting these two forms of Thikr in a manner not taught by our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and in a manner not practiced by the noble Sahabah of Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Further, Hazrat Ibn Masood (radi Allahu anhu) said: "This method was not in vogue during the time of Rasulullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)". This statement of Hazrat Ibn Masood (radi Allahu anhu) clearly means that if a form of worship was not instructed by our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) then it will be a Bid`ah. If the Sahaba did not entertain any new systems or any new ways of worship then we have no right whatsoever of introducing into Islam any new way or form of worship. OUR ANSWER There are two answers to this misleading attempt:- 1. You are also Bid`ati and act upon Haraam as well. You shout "Naara Takbeer" during your Jalsas when the lecturer makes a good point. You do not pass Fatwa against that and do not stop that loud Zikr. Moulana Rashid Ahmed Gangohi writes: "Zikr is correct in whatever way it may be". (i.e., loud or soft) (Fatawa Rashidia, pg. 251) According to your Fatwa, Moulana Rashid Ahmed Gangohi has become a Bid`ati. Why then do you people make so much noise about Bid`at? Your Elders are Bid`atis themselves! 2. The qoutation of "Fatawa Qazi Khan" is explained in "Fatawa Bazaazia": "To make Zikr with a loud voice is permissible as it happens in Azaan, Khutba, Jumma and Haj. This issue is explained in Fatawa Kharia Tharaly. Whatever is mentioned in Fatawa Qazi Khan, it means harmful loudness (is Bid`at)". (Fatawa Bazaazia, pg. 378) It became obvious from here that Hazrat Ibn Masood (radi Allahu anhu) called those people Bid`atis who were making Zikr with harmful loudness. It is possible that they may have been making loud Zikr at the time of Jamaat or that this might cause harm to the Deen. This "proof" which Majlisul Ulema presented to prove that Meelad functions are Bid`at did not help them at all. Rather it made them Bid`atis because Moulana Rashid Ahmed Gangohi wrote eight Fatawa in "Fatawa Rashidia" proving that loud Zikr is permissible.

FOURTEENTH OBJECTION Meelad is declared Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "MAINTAINING A CUSTOM WHICH WAS ORIGINATED BY IRRELIGIOUS PERSONS. It has already been explained elsewhere in this article that the originators of Meelad custom were irreligious persons. Six hundred years after our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the irreligious ruler of Irbal, assisted by irreligious learned men, invented and established this custom. Thus, those who organize Meelad functions and those who participate in them are in reality assisting to establish a practise introduced by evil men. They are aiding and abetting in the fostering of a custom which is in total conflict with the Shari`ah of Islam. It is a great crime to maintain and encourage customs and practices which were brought into being by those who had no connection with the Deen, more so, when these customs and practices are a conglomeration of un-Islamic elements". OUR ANSWER Some scholars have written that Meelad was invented in the 7th century by the king of Arbal, Abu Sa`eed Muzaffar. Those scholars have explained this with the reference of Haafiz Ibn Kaseer. But this not correct. Haafiz Ibn Kaseer has mentioned Abu Sa`eed Muzaffar in detail in "Al Bidaya Wan Nihaya". He wrote that King Abu Muzaffar used to celebrate Meelad-un-Nabi with pomp and glory, but nowhere has he mentioned that the King was an inventor of Meelad. We present a complete quotation of Haafiz Ibn Kaseer for a clear understanding. Ibn Kaseer writes regarding the events of the year 630 A.H.: "Amongst pious, generous and great Kings, there was a King, Abu Sa`eed Muzaffar. He used to celebrate Meelad in Rabi-ul-Awwal. His assembly of Meelad used to be one of its kind. He was brave, a thinker, pious, just and an Aalim of Deen. Sheikh Abul Khitaab Ibn Dahya wrote a book on the topic of Meelad titled `At Tanweer fi Moulidil Basheerin Nazeer`. On this, the King rewarded the Sheikh with one thousand Dinars. His government remained for a long time. He died while besieging Aka. His government and his character was excellent. Those people who attended the Meelad function arranged by King Muzaffar say that in his Meelad function there used to be 5 000 roasted sheep heads, 10 000 chickens, 100 000 pieces of cheese and 30 000 pieces of sweatmeats. Great Ulama and Sufis of that period participated in his Meelad assembly. His food table was open for people of all walks of life and from all areas. He used to give charity in all types of Ibaadah. He used to spend a lot on the Ibaadah of Makkah and Madina. He used to spend 30 000 Dinars in arranging water for Makkah and Madina. Charities which he gave secretly are hidden from us. May Allah send His Mercy upon King Muzaffar. He died in the year 630 A.H. in the fort of Arbal. He made a Wasiyat to be buried in Makkah but it was not carried out. He is buried in the neighbourhood of Hazrat Ali (radi Allahu anhu)". (Al Bidaya Wan Ni haya, Vol. 13, pg. 136-137, Darul Fikr, Beirut) The following matters arise from the statement of Haafiz Ibn Kaseer:- 1. King Abu Sa`eed Muzaffar was not the inventor of Meelad celebrations, 2. He was a pious, brave, thinker, just, an Aalim-e-Deen and not an evil man, 3. Great Ulama and Sufis of that time participated in Meelad functions, 4. He was generous and hospitable, 5. Nowhere is it said that he used to spend Baitul Maal money to celebrate Meelad, 6. People like Haafiz Ibn Kaseer regarded King Muzaffar as one of the great kings amongst Muslim Kings. Note that all the things which the Majlisul Ulama have mentioned about King Muzaffar are without any reference, therefore, making them unreliable. We have given our references in detail. You may check the original source. FIFTEENTH OBJECTION Meelad functions are branded Haraam and un-Islamic because of the following reasons: "Reviling and branding as unbelievers and heretics those who do not participate in these functions". OUR ANSWER This is another lie and baseless accusation. This objection has already been answered under the Second Objection earlier in our book. Please see the details there. SIXTEENTH OBJECTION Meelad function is branded Haraam because of the following reason: "Regarding the distribution of sweetmeats as essential. This too, is a further transgression committed against the Law of Allah. This custom of distributing sweetmeats at these functions is regarded as compulsory. A gross falsity in the name of Islam". OUR ANSWER This is another lie and baseless accusation. No Sunni Muslim believes, wrote or said that the distribution of sweetmeats is compulsory. If you are certain with your claim, why then are you hiding the proof? It seems that the Deobandi Ulama have qualified in a Masters Degrees in lying, deceiving and making false accusations. Remember, this is an issue of belief. You are unable to ascertain someone`s belief without that person uttering it or writing it. Why not show us who uttered or wrote that the distribution of sweetmeats is compulsory in Meelad functions?

ELEVENTH OBJECTION Meelad functions are declared Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "Israaf or waste of money in unnecessary ventures". OUR ANSWER People are served a meal at Meelaad functions. This is regarded as a waste of money by the Majlisul Ulama. On the ocassion of Walimah and Aqiqah, it is Sunnah to invite people for partaking in food. Why? Because it is an occasion of happiness. When the assembly of Zikr of the beloved Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) takes place, a Muslim is happy and joyful, therefore, he invites people to partake in the food provided, he gives charity and distributes sweatmeats. To feed people after an important or virtuous deed is the practice of the Sahaba. Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis Delwi (radi Allahu anhu) writes: "Imam Bihqi reports in `Sha`bul Iman` that Ibn Umar narrated that when Hazrat Umar (radi Allahu anhuma) completed the study of Surah Baqarah with all its secrets and hints in twelve years, he slaughtered a camel, prepared lots of food and fed the Sahabah". (Tafseer Fathul Aziz, pg. 86) Thus, it is proven that one may feed the people after an important virtuous deed. Meelad is also an important virtuous deed in the eyes of the Believers. Therefore, the distribution of food and sweatmeats is not Israaf (waste). We wish to remind you of the famous saying of Hazrat Ibn Umar (radi Allahu anhuma). Somebody told Hazrat Ibn Umar (radi Allahu anhuma) that there is goodness in waste. He immediately replied that to spend in goodness is not waste. TWELFTH OBJECTION Meelad is declared Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "Soliciting public funds for the upkeep and organizing of these functions". OUR ANSWER The Wahabi and Deobandi public do not contribute to Meelad functions at all. Why should there be a question of this nature? In most places, Meelad functions are arranged by individual families. They do not collect funds from anybody. In some places, certain organizations arrange massive Meelad gatherings and the members collect funds only from those people who believe in Meelad and thus, contribute happily. So, we ask, what is wrong with that? Don`t you collect funds for your Tableeghi Ijtima, which is, in our view, a waste of time and Muslim resources? Hundreds and thousands of Rands are spent just to erect the structure of the stage and tent, etc. Where does that money come from? Why does the Majlisul Ulama not issue a Fatwa against Ijtima because of the use of public money? Why is the entire effort made to make Meelad Haraam only? THIRTEEN OBJECTION Meelad is declared Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "Tashabboh bil Kufaar, the celebration of birthdays and anniversaries has no connection with Islam. This is an exclusive custom of the Kuffaar. Our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) did not celebrate birthdays and anniversaries. Nor did the Sahabah or the great learned Jurists of Islam. Such celebrations have no basis in the Shari`ah. In upholding these innovatory customs, Muslims are in fact imitating the Kuffaar and this our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has strictly forbidden". OUR ANSWER A. The Ulama of Deoband celebrated their hundred years anniversary of Darul Uloom Deoband in which they called Indhira Ghandi who was dressed in a Sarrie. She was seated on the stage while hundreds of Ulama were seated on the ground. Was this Islamic? Early Muslims did not celebrate hundred years establishment of Islam which was far more important that the establishment of Darul Uloom Deoband. According to you, our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) did not celebrate birthdays and anniversaries. If the Ulama-e-Deoband claim to be true followers of the Sunnah, why then did they celebrate the hundred year anniversary of Darul Uloom Deoband? Was this not a Bid`at? According to you, every Bid`at is an evil Bid`at. Well, I suppose that it is permissible in the Shari`ah of Deoband that you may act upon evil Bid`ats sometimes or maybe there is exemption for Ulema-e-Deoband in Shari`ah as there is exemption for elite Brahaman Caste in Hinduism! B. It is Sunnah to commemorate happiness. In order to explain this, I would like to quote a Hadith: "Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) was asked about fasting on a Monday. He replied, `I was born on that day and Wahi (Revelation) began upon me on that day`." (Mishkat, Kitabus Sawm, Baab Sawmut Tatawwo) It is now proven that to keep fast on a Monday is Sunnah because Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) was born on that day. Two issues are proven from the above Hadith:- 1. To commemorate important things is Sunnah. 2. It is Sunnah to do virtuous deeds and express happiness on the birth of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). These virtuous deeds can be in the form of Badni Ibaadat (bodily worship), such as fasting and Nafil Salaah, or it can be in the form of Maali Ibaadat (worship by utilising one`s wealth for Deen), like charity, feeding and distributing sweatmeats, etc. To brand Meelad celebrations as being similar to the act of the Kufaar is an insult to Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and an expression of total ignorance.

EIGHTH OBJECTION Meelad is Haraam and Bid`at because of the following reason: "Inter-mingling of sexes at such gatherings". We may add that Majlisul Ulama published a very interesting ruling: "Even if it is possible to screen the females completely from the man, then too, it is not possible for them to emerge from their homes to attend these functions for the simple reason that the Shari`ah has decreed that they may not emerge from their homes for even Salaah in the Masjid". (page 17) OUR ANSWER This is another false accusation. Women sit in Meelad gatherings separate from men with necessary Shari` Hijab. NECESSARY SHARI` HIJAB (PARDAH) The Shari` limit of Hijab for women is that they must cover the whole body besides the face, both hands and feet. Their hair must be covered and the clothes must not be so thin that the colour of the body may be seen. In the light of the Holy Quraan, Hadith and Fiqh it is not compulsory for woman to cover the face, hands and feet from a Ghair Mahram. (N.B.: It is Mustahab for women to cover the whole face and not Waajib) For further reference consult "Tafseer Mazhari", Vol. 6, pg. 493; "Tafseer Kabeer", Vol. 23, pg. 203; " Roohul Ma`aani", Vol. 18, pg. 128; "Khazin", Vol. 6, pg. 68; "Abu Dawood", Vol. 2, pg. 211; "Mishkaat", pg. 377; "Muslim", Vol. 2, pg. 212; "Mu`atta Imam Malik", pg. 708; "Quduri", pg. 246; "Kanzud Daqa`iq", pg. 424; "Mabsoot", Vol. 10, pg. 152-153; "Badaai-us-Sanaai`", Vol. 5, pg.121-122 If the women attend the Meelad functions with Shar`i Hijab, which they do, and sit separately from the men, surely this is not called "inter-mingling of sexes". Even if in a Meelad function, inter-mingling of sexes does occur, the actual Meelad celebration still will not become Haraam or an evil Bid`at. In this case, if such a thing happens then the people should be taught the correct manners. Allama Shaami (radi Allahu anhu) states: "One must not leave visiting the graves just because some illegal activities are taking place, for example, inter-mingling of sexes. Mustahabbaat (recommended acts) should not be left out because of this type of illegal activities. It is necessary for the people to visit the graves and stop the Bid`at". (Fatawa Shaami: Kitabul Jana`iz - Discussion on visiting the graves) Allama Shaami (radi Allahu anhu) has stated categorically that inter-mingling of sexes will not make any Mustahab act Haraam or avoided. There were idols in the Kaaba before Makkah was conquered, but Muslims did not leave out performing the Tawaaf (circumbulation) or Umrah because of the idols. Yes, when Almighty Allah gave them the power, they eventually destroyed the idols. When people go for Haj, there is inter-mingling of sexes at the airport, in the plane, during Tawaaf, at Mina and at Muzdalifah, yet no one puts a stop to Hajj. In Meelad gatherings, at least men and women sit separately and women are with Hijab. In the Nikah assembly, inter-mingling of sexes occurs and most of the women do not come with Shari` Hijab. Will the Majlisul Ulama issue Fatwas condemning Nikah gathering to be Haraam? If not, why then is your entire effort spent to make Meelaad functions Haraam? INTERESTING RULING Please read the eight objection (above) on the ruling of Majlisul Ulama and then read the our answer. There ruling is totally baseless. I wish that Majlisul Ulama could give proof of their ruling that under no circumstances may a woman emerge from her home. LADIES TA`LEEM BECOMES HARAAM Women belonging to the Tableeghi Jamaat have ladies Ta`leem programmmes, which takes place sometimes during the day and sometimes during the evenings. The women emerge from their homes and gather at a particular house to have their programme. If, according to the Majlisul Ulama`s argument, they cannot emerge from their homes even for Salaat, how can they emerge from their homes for ladies Ta`leem? According to the Fatwa of Majlisul Ulama, ladies Ta`leem programmes should also be considered Haraam. NINTH OBJECTION According to the Majlisul Ulama: "Salaat and its performance by Jamaat neglected in a mass scale". OUR ANSWER To show how seriously they object to the Meelad function, the Majlisul Ulama are merely repeatingtheir objections just to add more condemnation. Please refer to the detailed answer given under objection number 3 earlier in our book. TENTH OBJECTION Meelad is declared Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "Abstention from command of Amr Bil Ma`roof and Nahy anil Munkar when these becomes necessary at these funtions". OUR ANSWER This is another baseles accusation. It seems that the Majlisul Ulama translate "light" into "darkness". We regard Meelad functions as the best opportunity for "Amr bil Ma`roof" and "Nahy anil Munkar". Our Ulema take full advantage of these functions and command "Amr bil Ma`roof" and "Nahy anil Munkar" (Commanding that which is Good and Forbidding that which is Evil). The members of Majlisul Ulama do not attend Meelad functions, so how then can they say "Amr bil Ma`roof" and "Nahy anil Munkar" is not carried out at these functions?

FOURTH OBJECTION Meelad functions are declared Haraam because of the following reason: "Qawwali - Music at Meelad functions". OUR ANSWER This is another baseless accusation. I have never observed any function of Meelad in which Qawwali is sung. If anyone has Qawwali with music in a Meelad function then he or she should be stopped and told that it is not correct. They should be advised to put a stop to such an activity, but should not be stopped from celebrating the Meelad function. Eid-ul-Fitr and Eid-ul-Adha are days of worship and collective happiness for the Muslims. Some people have made these days as occasions of merry-making. On Eid-ul-Fitr, people in Johannesburg get together at the Zoo Lake. Inter-mingling of sexes is seen openly. Women wear fancy make- up on their faces. Blaring music is played. No Mufti has ever issued a Fatwa that Eid-ulFitr or Eid-ul-Adha should be stopped based on the non-Shari` activities, or that the days of Eid should not be celebrated anymore. Eid celebrations are not stopped although many Haraam activities have certainly mixed with the occasion. Why then should the Meelad celebrations be stopped? FIFTH OBJECTION Meelad function is declared Haraam because of the following reason: "Reciting of verses which transgress the limits of legitimate praise, thus assigning a position of divinity to our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam)." OUR ANSWER Here is another lie and false accusation. We believe that if anyone writes or says anything which proves Divinity to our Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), then that person is a Kaafir and Mushrik. Majlisul Ulama failed to furnish any proof of the blasphemous verse being sung. This is another accusation based on assumption. This type of baseless accusation are not suitable at all for those who claim to be learned. SIXTH OBJECTION Meelad function is declared Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "The congregation of various types of people such as fussaaq (open and rebellious sinners), immoral people with evil intentions, etc.)" OUR ANSWER Before I answer this objection, I would like to ask all the Ulema of Deoband - you say that the Prophet`s and the Awliya do not have Knowledge of the Unseen, since when do you have the Knowledge of the Unseen for you are able to see the good or evil intentions of people? Can you say with certainty that not one amongst all those thousands of people who attend the Ijtima is an open sinner? I am sure that you cannot because this type of claim can only be done via Wahi (Revelation). Many sinners definitely attend the Ijtima. Why then you do not issue the Fatwa that Ijtima and partaking in the Ijtima is Haraam and an evil Bid`at? If an open sinner recites Quraan, will you stop the recitation because the sinner is participating in the recitation of the Quraan? So if any sinner attends the Meelad function, why then does the Meelad function become Haraam and an evil Bid`at? SEVENTH OBJECTION Meelad function is branded Haraam, un-Islamic and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "Singing at these functions by young boys and girls". OUR ANSWER First and foremost, to describe the beautiful recitation of praises of our beloved Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) with the word "singing" discloses your hidden agenda. It is a psychological fact that if you describe something with a distasteful or vile term it will definitely not create any importance in the mind of people about what you wish to describe. Your job is to belittle all those things which lead towards the love of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). If Na-Baligh (immature) boys and girls read in Meelad functions, there is nothing wrong with that. Baaligha (######) girls do not read at all in Meelad functions. If in any function a baaligha girl reads a Naat in front of the audience, that will not make the Meelad Haraam. Rather, people should be told about the illegitimacy of this act. The reading of Baligh boys in front of an audience is Ja`iz (permissable). There is no proof in Shar`iah against it unconditionally. Therefore, it should not be an issue of debate. In many Darul Ulooms, Amard (young boys with no beard grown yet) study with adult men and they mix with each other. Sometimes, evil results of that mixing emerge as well. Why then do the Ulema of Deoband not close Darul Ulooms? If they do not wish to close their Darul Ulooms, why then do they ask us to stop the celebration of Meelad in which such danger does not even exist because young children are under the continuous scrutiny of their parents and guardians? Otherwise, explain the reason for your illogical objection!.

4 sharing masa'il..........

g............dost lafz me to koi qabahat nzr nhe aati..........n iski daleel apko Ubaid e Raza Bhai ny b dy di.......... ALAHAZRAT ny b apni shairi me hum nikammon k liye shair likha: Hum to bid kr wohi karen jis me, DOST naaraz hy, kia hona hy.......??

yes................zbr10 naat............. mujy b buhhhhhhhhhhhhht pasand hy ye naaaaaat...........i luv dis naaaaaat..........!!!!!

aap ny achi wazahat farma di.............me b thorhi confused thi............

kisi ko maloom ho to plzzzzzzzzzz inform kren.................kia Dawateislami k zer e ehtmam Ramazanul Mubarak me koi course (islami behno k liye) ho rha hy..........????

"FOURTH OBJECTION" onwards.............pending.......

THE CONCEPT OF "HAAZIR-O-NAAZIR" USED FOR RASOOLULLAH (SALLAL LAAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM) Imam Ahle Sunnat, Hazrat Sayed Ahmed Sa`eed Qazmi (radi Allahu anhu) states: "When the word Haazir-o-Naazir is used for Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), it does not mean that the physical body of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is everywhere and that he is present in front of everybody. This in fact means that as the soul exists in every part of the body similarly the light filled reality of the Soul of both the worlds (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) exist in every atom of the worlds. Based on that Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) arrives with his spirituality and lightfulness in many places at one time. Many times, the Pious observe the beauty of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) in a state of wakefulness with their physical eyes". (Taskeenul Khawatir fi Mas`alatil Haazir wan Naazir,pg.13, Maktabah-e-Haamdya, Lahore). Nowhere in the above definition has it been mentioned that "Haazir-o-Naazir" means "omnipresent". It seems that the entire research of Majlisul Ulema is based on the issues which they have heard of or assumed. THIRD OBJECTION Meelad celebrations are declared as Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reason: "Meelaad functions are regarded as being of greater importance than Salaat and performance of Salaat in Jamaat". OUR ANSWER This is another false accusation. No Muslim ever regards the Meelad function as being more important than Salaat. It is almost 10 years that I am residing in South Africa and I have attended hundreds of Meelad fuctions. Alhumdullilah, I have always found that the Salaat arrangement had been made with Jamaat. Those who are not punctual with their Salaat will miss Salaat even if they are sitting at home or are gone to attend a Tableeghi Ijtima. Now, due to some people not reading Salaat, does this make the Meelad function Haraam? It is strange that those who have never attended Meelad functions, to them no arrangement of Salaat is made and people don`t read Salaat at Meelad functions. You are giving testimony of an issue to a place in which you have not been present! Is this correct according to the Law of Shari`ah? This objection is just an excuse to stop people from participating in the Zikr (remembrance) of our beloved Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Sometimes we observe in a Nikah (marriage) assembly that people get delayed due to some reason. Thereafter, some read their Salaat while others do not. Will one pass a Fatwa that Nikah functions are Haraam? If a person travellling by car from Johannesburg to Cape Town misses a few of his Salaah or misses the Jamaat, will one pass a Fatwa that travelling in a car from Johannesburg to Cape Town is Haraam? If an assembly of Nikah and travelling remains Halaal, why then does the Meelad function become Haraam? What criteria are you using?

THE SUBJECT OF "OMNIPRESENT This is another false accusation that Sunnis believe Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) to be omnipresent. This is not the belief of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah, neither is it the meaning of the words "Haazir" and "Naazir". The word "omnipresent", according to the Oxford Dictionary, means "present everywhere". When the word "Haazir" and "Naazir" is used for Almighty Allah it means "Knower" and "Seeir" and does not mean to be present everywhere. (See details in "Fatawa Shami", Vol. 3, pg. 337). The meaning of the word "Haazir" in the Arabic dictionary is, "one who can be seen with the naked eye." (For refrence, refer to "Sarrah", pg. 170; "Mukhtaarus Sihaah", pg. 159; "Mufreedaat Imam Raaghib", pg. 372). The meaning of the word "Naazir" is "blackness of the eyeball in which the pupil of the eye is". Sometimes, the eye itself is called Naazirah ( Reference "Mukhtaarus Sihaah", pg. 691) It is now proven that the words "Haazir" and "Naazir" according to its literal meaning are not suitable for Almighty Allah. Whenever it is used for Allah it is used with Ta`weel (re-interpretation), as explained above. CHALLENGE We challenge Majlisul Ulama to prove that the words "Haazir-o-Naazir" means "omnipresent". (N.B.: not from Urdu to English or modern Arabic dictionaries because they are not based on Quranic Arabic). The literal meaning of the words "Haazir-o-Naazir" has been explained above and the Mu`awwal (re-interpreted) meaning of the words "Haazir-o-Naazir" for Allah is "Knower" and "Seeir". I have consulted many dictionaries to look for the word "omnipresent" and in all the dictionaries there are no meanings even close to the meaning of the words "Haazir-o-Naazir". I found that "omnipresent" is not the meaning of the words "Haazir-o-Naazir" at all. The words "Haazir-o-Naazir" in its literal meaning is never used for Allah Ta`ala. Therefore, in the 99 Names of Allah, one would not find the Names of " Haazir" and "Naazir". Nowhere in the Quraan or Hadith are the names "Haazir" and "Naazir" used as Allah`s Names. No one can prove that the Sahabah or Tabi`in or Jurist Imams have ever used the words "Haazir" and "Naazir" for Allah Ta`ala. THE USE OF THE WORD "HAAZIR-O-NAAZIR" FOR THE HOLY PROPHET (SALLAL LAAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM) Since it is proven that "Haazir-o-Naazir" does not mean "omnipresent" nor is it an Attribute of Allah Ta`ala which is impossible to manifest in the servants of Allah, like Uluhiyyat (Divinity). The Ulema have used the words "Haazir-o-Naazir" for Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Hazrat Sheikh Abdul Haq Muhaddis Delwi (radi Allahu anhu) writes: "Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is Haazir-o-Naazir on the deeds of his Ummah". (Haashiya Akhbarul Akhyaar, pg. 155).

SECOND OBJECTION The Meelad celebration is declared as Haraam and an evil Bid`at by Majlisul Ulama due to the following reasons:- 1. The practice of Qiyaam or standing in reverence when the Salaami or Salwaat is recited. 2. The votaries of Meelad believe that it is Fardh (compulsory) to make Qiyaam (standing) during these Meelad functions. 3. They proceed further to commit an act of extreme gravity by branding as Kaafir the one who does not make this Qiyaam in the Meelad celebration. 4. Kitaabs written by the votaries of Moulood ambiguously state that the one who does not make Qiyaam (standing) is a Kaafir. 5. Hazrat Anas (radi Allahu anhu) narrates the following Hadith: "There was none whom the Sahabah loved as much as Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). When they saw Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), they did not stand because they knew that he detested this (practice of standing)". (Tirmizi ; Musnad Ahmed) (pg. 12) In the commentary of this Hadith, Majlisul Ulama writes that the "Sahabah did not stand in respect of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and that Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) disliked such a practice". (pg. 13) 6. Majlisul Ulama write: Why don`t you people stand when Rasoolullah`s (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) name is mentioned in Tashahud, lectures, reciting of the Kalima, Khutba, etc.? Why you do not stand when the Quraan is recited or when Allah`s name is mentioned? (I have summarised this question) (pg. 13 -14). 7. Others again stand because of a reason which is much more dangerous than the reason for which the majority of people stand. Some cherish the believe that the Soul of our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) presents itself at these sessions of Meelad, hence it is necessary to stand in respect. This is a fallacious and a highly misleading belief. This belief leads to Shirk or association with Allah Ta`ala in an attribute which is exclusive in Divinity. Let us assume that A holds a Meelad function in his home, B does the same in his home, C also has a Meelaad celebration and D does likewise also. Meelaad functions are taking place in various masaajids all over the world. Now let us assume that these functions happen to take place at the same time and the Salaami is being recited at these various venues at once at the same time. A is under the impression that Rasoolullah`s (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) Soul is present at his function. B, C, D and the people in the various masaajid all over the world are under the same impression. We have assumed that the Salaami is being recited at the same time in the various places, hence it will follow that our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is present at the place of A, B, C, D, etc. at one and the same time. In other words, this belief means that our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is present here, there and everywhere at one at the same time. This is bestowing the Divine Attribute of Omnipresence upon our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Thus, this belief assigns to our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) Divinity by way of according Omnipresence to our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). This is in reality the commission of Shirk which is a capital crime - a crime most heinous in the Eyes of Allah (pg. 15) OUR ANSWER 1. The Peer-o-Murshid (Spiritual leader) of the Ulema-e-Deoband, Hazrat Haji Imdadullah Muhaajir Makki (radi Allahu anhu) writes: "The way of life of this Faqeer (Muhaajir Makki) is that I participate in the assembly of Moulood, and I celebrate this function every year and regard this assembly as a source for blessings and I find enjoyment in Qiyaam (standing)". (Faisala Haft Mas`ala, pg. 5, printed by Madani Qutub Khana, Multan, Pakistan). The following issues are proven from the above quotation of Hazrat Haji Imdadullah (radi Allahu anhu): A. The Peer-o-Murshid says that Qiyaam is Ja`iz (permissible) and that he finds enjoyment in it. The Mureeds say that it is Haraam and evil Bid`at. I am sure that both cannot be correct. If the Mureeds are correct then it would mean that the Murshid has commited an act which is Haraam and evil Bid`at. But, if the Murshid is correct, then the Mureeds have given a wrong Fatwa on the Murshid for committing a Haraam and an evil Bid`at. Is this the Adab (respect) shown by the Ulema-e-Deoband for their spiritual leader? The Majisul Ulama do not feel ashamed in addressing themselves as spiritual students of such a person, on one hand, yet this noble personality practiced something which they condemned as unacceptable. B. Committing Haraam makes a person a sinner and to announce the sin makes a person a Fasiq-e-Mo`lin (an open sinner). It is Haraam to make Bai`t (allegiance) on the hand of a Fasiq-e-Mo`lin. The spiritual Silsila (order) of the Majlisul Ulama becomes munqa-te (inconsistent) if their Murshid committed a Haraam act (which is Qiyaam). Why then do their Mashaa`ikh deceive people by making them their Mureeds, since they have no consistent spiritual order. 2. This is another false and baseless accusation. No one has ever said that the act of Qiyaam in Meelaad functions is Fardh. Aa`la Hazrat, Imam Ahle Sunnat, Moulana Ahmed Raza Khan (radi Allahu anhu) writes: "Qiyaam is consistently practiced by famous Imams. None of them refuted or denied this. Therefore, it is Mustahab (recommended)". (Iqaamatul Qiyaamah, pg. 19, Noori Qutub Khana). CHALLENGE You are requested to quote from an authentic source to prove that we have declared Qiyaam in Salaato-Salaam as Fardh. APPEAL We appeal to the public who follow the Ulema-e-Deoband that they should ask them proof for their claims. If they cannot present a proof, which I am certain that will be unable to, then at least tell them to please stop lying and to stop causing Fitna. 3. Another baseless accusation and an open lie. We have never ever branded anyone as Kaafir just because he does not participate in the act of Qiyaam (standing). Qiyaam is only regarded as Mustahab according to us. One who leaves a Mustahab act is not even a sinner, let alone becoming a Kaafir. Those who stop the people from taking part from Qiyaam or Meelaad are absolutely wrong because they are stopping people from taking part in a Mustahab act. Aa`la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) or any other Ulema-e-Ahle Sunat have given the Fatwa of Kufr only against those people who were Mirza`i or those who insulted Almighty Allah and His Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Even till today, their blasphemous statements are being published in their books. Now read carefully what Moulana Murtuza Hassen Naazim-e Taaleemat-e Darul Uloom Deoband has to say in this regard: "Khan Bereilvi says that some Ulema of Deoband do not accept Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) as Khaatamun Nabiy`yeen, regard the knowledge of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) equal to animals and the insane, and regard Shaytaan as more knowledgeable than Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), therefore, they are Kaafirs. All the Ulema of Deoband say that this ruling of Khan Saheb is correct. Whoever makes this type of statement is a Kaafir Murtad (apostate) and cursed one. Bring your Fatwa. We will endorse it as well. One who does not regard these type of Murtads (apostates) as Kaafir, he is also Kaafir. These beliefs are indeed blasphemous". ( Ashaddul Azaab, pg. 11). "If, according to Khan Saheb, some Ulema of Deoband were really like that as he thought, than it was Fardh (compulsory) on Khan Saheb to declare them as Kaafirs. If he did not call them Kaafirs, then he himself would have become Kaafir". (Ashaddul Azaab, Moulana Murtaza Hassen Dar Banghi, pg. 12). The following issues are proven from the above two statements from "Ashaddul Azaab":- A. Aa`la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) did not regard anyone as Kaafir because of not participating in Meelaad or Qiyaam. B. Aa`la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) only regarded those people as Kaafirs who insulted Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). C. The principles upon whom the Fatwas of Kufr were given are accepted between Deobandi and Sunni Ulema. D. Aa`la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) was compelled by the Shari`ah to issue Fatwas of Kufr upon those people, otherwise he himself would have become Kaafir. E. Aa`la Hazrat (radi Allahu anhu) had given the Fatwa of Kufr on only few people - those who wrote blasphemous statements, and those who after understanding fully these statements, regarded them as accurate and in the spirit of Islam and Shari`ah. CHALLENGE We challenge Majlisul Ulema and all their affiliates to prove that which recognised Sunni Aalim has written that those who do not participate in Qiyaam are Kaafirs. If they can prove their claims, I will leave Sunnism to join them. APPEAL I appeal to the Tableegi Jamaat: Obtain the proof from your Ulema, because if you are able to obtain this proof from your Ulema, you will win me over in your mission. Lots of others will come with me as well and your job will become easier as well as you have been trained to convert people from Islam into the fold of Tableegism. We are prepared to come and join you just with one condition - just obtain the proof for us. If you are unable to do so, then do the real Tableegh and tell your Ulama, "Shame on you. What do you want to achieve through lying?" The people are not fools out there. Please stop lying! 4. This is another lie. If Kitaabs are written by the Meelaad supporters whereby it is stated that those who do not make Qiyaam are Kaafirs, why then did you not give the name of at least one Kitaab? Readers, please phone and write to Majlisul Ulama and the Y.M.M.A. and demand from them at least one of the names amongst of those Kitaabs. 5. Moulana Mohammed Zakaria, the author of "Tableeghi Nisaab", explains the Hadith of Hazrat Anas (radi Allahu anhu) in "Sharah Shama`ile Tirmizi": "This Hadith indicates towards the high degree of humbleness of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) did not like (that people should stand for him), although he is possessor of high glory and is Master of both the worlds. Therefore, the Sahabah sometimes did not stand due to the love because Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) disliked it as it is the requirement of this narration (of Hazrat Anas) and sometimes they used to stand due to the demand of love". It is stated in "Abu Dawood" that, "Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) used to talk to us in the masjid. When Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) used to stand, we used to stand up and we used to remain standing till Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) used to get into the home". (Sharah Shamaa`ile Tirmizi, pg. 342, Maktaba Rahmania , Lahore). Moulana Zakaria explains the reason for not standing, "Qazi Ayaz (radi Allahu anhu) says that, `Qiyaam is prohibited whereby somebody well known is sitting and rest of the people are standing. Therefore, in the Hadith of prohibition (from Qiyaam), it is also said, ` do not stand as the Ajmees (non- Arabs) stand for their chiefs`". (Sharah Shamaa`ile Tirmizi, pg. 342) Moulana Zakaria writes further: "Imam Nowvi says that it is Mustahab to stand for Ulema, respectful and noble people". (Sharah Shamaa`ile Tirmizi, pg. 342). Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi has written a long story about Moulana Qassim Nanotwi and Hakim Abdus Salaam. "Hakim Abdus Salaam had a desire to meet Moulana Nanotwi who was at the time sitting with many people. When Hakim Abdus Salaam arrived, everybody stood up to pay respect to him". (Arwahe Salaasa, pg. 230, story number 215, Islami Academy, Lahore.) The narration of "Abu Dawood" proves that the Sahabah used to stand for Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and the reason for prohibition was also dealt with. Imam Nowvi (radi Allahu anhu) said: "It is Mustahab to stand for Ulema and Moulana Nanotwi and all his fellows stood up to pay respect for Hakim Abdus Salaam". I suppose that Majlisul Ulama are quick to condemn others and are lazy to study the literature of their own elders. Do we have to teach the Majlisul Ulama about their household matters also! 6. This objection is not worth any consideration. If Allah gives Tawfeeq to someone that every Zikr he recites or listens to from the beginning to the end in a standing position, it is a good practice and we will not stop him. We will not tell him to only stand at the time that the Salaami is recited and to remain seated for the other Ibaadah . It is difficult for people to stand in a Meelad assembly from the beginning to the very end, so they stand up when the birth of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is being mentioned or when the Salaami is read. Why did the Ulema of Deoband open a Darul Uloom in Deoband and not in Makkah? Why do South African Tableeghis have Ijtijma during the Easter holidays and not in the December holidays? Why did Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi write "Nashruteeb" in the Zikr of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and not write a separate book about the Zikr of Allah only? Can someone prove Hurmat (prohibition) with these types of silly arguments? 7. Majlisul Ulema`s spiritual guide, Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, writes: "Mohammed Al Hazrami Majzoob was a possessor of amazing qualities and miracles. Once, he performed Jummah and gave Khutbah in 30 cities at the same time. He could be present in many cities in the same night". (Jamalul Auliya, pg. 188, Maktaba Islamia, Lahore). Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi believed and trusted this story, therefore, he has included it in his book, "Jamalul Auliya". The presence of Mohammed Al Hazrami in many places was accomplished with his physical body. The physical world is a restricted place. Mohammed Al Hazrami was the servant of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). He indeed achieved this station because of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). One can now imagine the powers and the station of the mubarak (blessed) Soul of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) who is the Master and Chief of all the Prophets. So the possibility of his soul being present in many places should not even be an issue of debate amongst Muslims. If it was Shirk to believe that one person can be present in many places, then according to your own Fatwas, your elder, Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, is a Mushrik because he believed in the correctness of the story of Mohammed Al Hazrami. Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi mentioned the story in his book and did not refute it. This proves that this story is authentic according to him and correct in his view. Moulana Qassim Nanotwi explains the meaning of this verse "An Nabi Yu Aula Bil Mu`menina Min Anfosihim ...." by saying: "Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has such nearness with his Ummah that even their souls do not have, because in this verse the word `Aula` is in the meaning of `Aqrab` (nearest)." (Tahzeerun Naas, pg.14, Darul Isha`at, Karachi). According to the explanation of Moulana Nanotwi, the meaning of the verse will be "The Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is nearer to the Believers then their own lives". Our lives are "present". Nobody can deny this fact because if the life is absent then it would mean that we are dead. Our being alive proves that our life is "present".I cannot seem to understand that when our life itself is "present" and the one who is nearest to us than our own lives, is regarded as being "absent". If someone believes that the Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is "present", then he is a Mushrik! What logic is this? Will the Majlisul Ulema or any other Deobandi Aalim be able to prove that the one who is nearest to our lives is absent? Let`s see how much logic you can have behind your arguments. Hazrat Haji Imdadullah Muhaajr Makki (radi Allahu anhu) writes: "Our Ulema fight in the issue of Meelad Shareef. The Ulema believed in its permissibility as well. When the side of permissibility exists, why then is there so much hardness on this issue? For us, it is sufficient to follow the people of Haramain (Makkah and Medina). At the time of Qiyaam one should not have the belief of Tawallud (that Rasoolullah - sallal laahu alaihi wasallam - is born now). The possibility of the arrival of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) in the Meelad assembly is not wrong because the bodily world is restricted to time and place, but the spiritual world is free from both. So the arrival of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is not far from being possible". (Shamaime Imdaadiya, pg.50, Madani Qutub Khana, Multan).

..............edited............it ws doubled

REPLY TO THE 17 OBJECTIONS POSED BY MAJLISUL ULAMA FIRST OBJECTION Meelad celebration is declared as Haraam and an evil Bid`at because of the following reasons: 1. The compulsory nature assigned to Meelad by its votaries. 2. It was completely unknown to the Messenger of Allah, his noble Sahabah and the great Jurists and Ulema of Islam (pg.12). OUR ANSWER 1. No Sunni Muslim believes that Meelad celebration is compulsory. We believe that the Meelad celebration is Mustahab (recommended). Alamma Ismail Haqi (radi Allahu anhu) quotes in "Tafseer Ruhul Bayaan": "Imam Jalaaluddin Suyuti has said that it is Mustahab for us to celebrate Meelad of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) as to thank Allah". (Ruhul Bayaan, Vol. 9, pg. 56). Majlisul Ulema claims that Meelad is not even Mustahab (pg. 12). I could present many facts to prove that the Meelad celebration is Mustahab, but would prefer to leave you, the reader, with the view and belief of the great Imam Suyuti (radi Allahu anhu). Let us see what Fatwa Majlisul Ulema will give on Imam Jalaaluddin Suyuti (radi Allahu anhu)! CHALLENGE: If Majlisul Ulema is honest in their claim that the Ahlus Sunnah Wa Jamaah believe that Meelad celebration is necessary, then they must show us the proof of who wrote that? 2. It is true that in the time of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the period of the Sahabah and in the period of the Tabi`in, Meelad was not celebrated as it is done in the present form. But the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), Sahabah or Tabi`in did not prohibit it as well. This is an accepted principle of Shari`ah that the performance of something is proof of Jawaaz (permissibility), and not doing it is NOT the proof of it`s prohibition. The same principle has been explained by Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi in "Nashrut-Teeb", pg.87, published by World Islamic Publishers, Delhi. Your claim that the Sahaba did not celebrate Meelad is destroyed by your own leader! In fact, this style of argument is childish and not academic. Please try to find some other proofs so that you may be heard! The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the Sahabah and the Tabi`in did not have Ijtima, Ghust, forty days or Shab Ghuzari. The present form of "Tableegh" activities are completely unlinked with Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), the Sahabah, Tabi`in and Jurist Imams (radi Allahu anhum). Following the same principles, why don`t you also regard these "Tableegh" related activities as Haraam? I suppose that you have taken Shari`ah as your slave-girl, therefore, Shari`ah must give ruling according to your desire. Allah forbid!

FACTORS WHICH MAKE THE CUSTOMARY MOULOOD CELEBRATIONS UN-ISLAMIC ACCORDING TO THE MAJLISUL ULAMA There are many wrongs and evil attendant to the present forms of celebrating Meelad. These are as follows: 1. The Compulsory Nature assigned to Meelad by its votaries. 2. The Practice of Qiyaam or standing in reverence when the Salaami or Salawaat is recited. 3. Meelad functions regarded as being of greater importance than Salaat in Jamaat. 4. Qawwali - Music at Meelad functions. 5. Reciting of verses which transgress the limits of legitimate praise, thus assigning a position of Divinity to our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). 6. The congregation of various types of people such as Fussaaq (open and rebellious sinners), immoral people with evil intentions, etc. 7. Singing at these functions by young boys and girls. 8. Intermingling of the sexes at such gatherings. 9. Salaat and its performance by Jamaat neglected on a mass scale. 10. Abstention from the command of Amr Bil Ma`roof Nahy anil Munkar when these become necessary at these functions. 11. Israaf or waste of money is unnecessary ventures. 12. Soliciting public funds for the upkeep and organisation of these functions. 13. Tashab`buh Bil Kuffaar. 14. Maintaining a custom which was originated by irreligious persons. 15. Reviling and branding as unbelievers and heretics those who do not participate in these functions. 16. Regarding the distribution of sweetmeats as essential to these functions. 17. The belief that the soul of our Nabi (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) presents itself at these functions. It is clear that Majlisul Ulema have made several attacks on "The present form of celebrating Meelad". Before we answer each of these 17 points it is important to explain the present manner in which the Meelad is celebrated. The present manner or form in which Meelad is celebrated consists of the recitation of the Holy Quran, praises of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) in the form of Naats and educational lectures, charity, feeding and Salaatu Salaam which is respectfully recited in the standing position. All the above-mentioned practices are tangibly proven by the great Mohaddithin and pious personalities of Islam who are accepted as authorities amongst us and belong to the school of thought whom even the members of Majlisul Ulema claim to follow. References will be given in the discussion wherever necessary.

YES, MEELAD CELEBRATION IS COMMENDABLE! A POINT-BY-POINT REPLY TO MAJLISUL ULAMA By Moulana Abdun Nabi Hamidi (Chairman - Sunni Ulema Council – Gauteng) THREE NECESSARY CLARIFICATIONS Before I begin answering those objections which the organization, Majlis ul Ulema, has written against the celebration of Meelad, I feel it necessary to first clarify three important issues. These are:- 1. With reference to the Meelad celebration, only those celebrations or acts are recognized which discusses the Seerat-un-Nabi or noble life of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). In such a celebration a session of Naat (Poems in praise of Rasoolullah - sallal laalhu alaihi wasallam) recitals take place, people are fed, and a sincere effort is made to fill the hearts of Muslims with the love of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). 2. For the permissibility of Meelad celebrations, we have never meant that one should fix a particular day or night for the Meelad and believe that Meelad is not Ja`iz (permissible) on any other date. It is our view that whosoever does such an act does so out of ignorance because the love and the relation to the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) demands that one should always mention him continuously. Yes, we do say that to mention him in the month of his birth should be increased so that the people could arrange gatherings and congregations to refresh the memories of the Nabawi period. By doing so, the message of the Deen could reach the audience in a strong way through these gatherings. 3. Thus, the gatherings of Meelad-un-Nabi are indeed a great means for calling people towards Almighty Allah. This is a golden opportunity which should not be wasted at any cost. It is, therefore, compulsory on the lecturers that they should teach people about the virtues, excellences, character, Adab, life, dealings and worship of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). The masses should be invited towards good deeds, success and the fear of Shirk (polytheism), evil, Bid`at and Fitna (mischief) should be instilled in them. With the blessings of Allah Ta`ala this had always been the tradition or way of our life. We wish to say in no uncertain terms that the purpose of these gatherings are not to merely gather the masses and demonstrate our collectivity. Rather, these functions are the means of achieving great and virtuous objectives. The Majlisul Ulema have dropped bombs of abuse and unnecessary scandalous accusation in their booklet. Many statements were made which do not make sense to the people of knowledge and wisdom. We will not elaborate much about these in our discussion but we will try to briefly cover them towards the end of our treatise. We will begin our subject by firstly making the readers aware of the 17 points which the Majlisul Ulema had so erroneously presented in their objections. What are their 17 points?

4 sharing........ it z the translation of: "BAD-SHAHON KI HADDIYAN"

nice shariing............. its the translation of: "TV KI TABAH-KARIYAN"

ss............ nice sharing...........