islamic brother

بھائی بہتر تھا کہ آپ کوئی ویڈیو ثبوت پیش کرتے ۔ یا اس وقت تک کا انتظار کرتے جب ویڈیو یا آڈیو آ جاتی ۔اس کی کوئی حیثیت نہیں ہے۔

اعلحضرت سید پیر مہر علی شاہ کے حوالے سے افضلیت شیخین کے حوالے سے چند اقتباسات کے سکین انکی مشہور کتاب تصفیہ مابین سنی و شیعہ سے پیش خدمت ہیں جن سے سید صاحب کے عقائد کے بارے میں وضاحت ہو جائے گی۔

بھائی ہمیں رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلماور صحابہ کی پیروی کا کہا گیا ہے اور جماعت کے ساتھ منسلک رہنے کا کہا گیا ہے پر ہم الگ الگ ٹولیوں کی شکل میں گروہ اہلسنت سے کٹتے رہتے ہیں اورآج حالت یہ ہے کہ تقریباً ہر آستانہ والے دوسرے آستانے والوں کو غلط کہتے ہیں اللہ ہمیں اہلسنت و جماعت اور اجماع پر قائم رکھے اورفرقوں کے شر سے بچائے۔۔ آمین

شیعہ کی اپنی کتب میں لکھا ہےکہ ابو طالب نے شرک کو ظاھر کیا اور ایمان کو چھپایئے رکھا اور ظاہری طور پر ایمان نہیں لائے۔

یہ سب شیعان ابن سبا کی من گھڑت داستانیں ہیں اور کچھ نہیں۔۔۔

علامہ مقبول احمد صاحب نے اس کا جواب دیا ہے۔ کتابی شکل میں۔۔۔

These claims are totally baseless and based on fabricated narrations of Rafidah..

پیر مہر علی شاہ تو افضلیت شیخین کے قائل تھے۔۔ پیر نصیر الدین نے تو اوور بہت سے مسائل میں بھی اختلاف کیا ہے اور ان کے اختلاف کی کوئی حیثیت نہیں ہے۔ تو کیا وہ یہ بھی کہنا پسند کریں گے کہ میں وھابیوں کو اس لیے پسند کرتا ہوں کہ وہ اللہ کی توحید کا بڑا چرچا کرتے ہیں۔یا ان کو اللہ سے بڑاپیار ہے۔

Waseem bhai is ki authenticity kia hai. I dont think k aik nomolood ko u sarkar Maloon frmayen aur Hazrat Usman ra us ko wapis bulwa lain.

Ye dekhen jnb shia mufassir Hussain Bakhsh sb kia keh rahy han.is k bd b koi gunjaish rehti ha.

Imam Al-Nawawi mentions something similar in his commentation on the tradition. He says: “It might have been that Sa’d was among a group who used to insult Ali [ra], and So the inquiry of Mu’awiya [ra], according to this understanding would be: What prevented you, O Sa’d, from insulting Ali, when everyone around you was doing it.” Rather we should ponder over that, what would have stopped Mu’awiya [ra] from putting a punishment on Sa’d [ra] if he had ordered for Ali [ra] to be insulted and Sa’d [ra] refused? Mu’awaiya [ra] was the Caliphate at the time, so what would stop him? And with this, no punishment or penalty was placed on Sa’d [ra]. Rather we see that Mu’awiya refered to Ali [ra] as Abu Turab, the most beloved Kunya to Ali [ra], since it was given to him by the Prophet of Allah. Let us present it to you, (Sahi bukhari 8.297): Narrated Sahl bin Sa`d: There was no name dearer to `Ali than his nickname Abu Turab (the father of dust). He used to feel happy whenever he was called by this name. The confusion stems from the fact that it says: أمر معاوية بن أبي سفيان سعدا فقال ما منعك أن تسب أبا التراب Translation: Muawiya bin abi Sufyan commanded Saad, asking him: what prevented you from insulting Abu Turab? Now a typical liar would translate this as “Muawiya ordered Saad to insult Abu Turab” but anyone can see that is not what is written, even though it could have very easily been written differently if Muawiya was truly commanding someone to insult someone. And of course, Saad responds by saying all the great things about Ali and Muawiya doesn’t object at all. Lastly, Justice and Trustworthiness are high caliber qualities. Muaawiya(ra) was also a highly political and intelligent person. Would he not realize that such of his statements(if he did say those supposedly) could be harmful to his political stability? Kufa was a den for Ali(ra). lovers. Even a lowly politician would not do something like this as it would be simply encouraging the lovers of Ali r.a to rebel against his govt. Imam Al-Qurtubi said: “The most authentic narration used is his (i.e. Muawiyah) saying to Sa’d b. Abi Waqas: What prevented you from insulting Abu Turab? And this is not [in any way] a declaration that he asked him to insult [him], rather it just was an inquiry about why he didn’t”. 893 – وأنبأنا ابن ناجية ، أيضا ، قال : حدثنا حسين بن مهدي الأبلي قال : حدثنا عبد الرزاق قال : أنبأنا معمر ، عن الزهري قال : لما قتل علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه وجاء الحسن بن علي رضي الله عنهما إلى معاوية فقال له معاوية : لو لم يكن لك فضل على يزيد إلا أن أمك امرأة من قريش وأمه امرأة من كلب لكان لك عليه فضل ، فكيف وأمك فاطمة بنت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم 1893 From the way of Al-Zuhri, he said: When Ali ibn Abi Talib (Radiya Allah ‘Anh) was killed, Al Hasan ibn Ali (Radiya Allah ‘Anhuma) came to Mu’awiya. Mu’awiya said to him: If your only virtue over Yazeed was that your mother is a woman from Quraysh and his mother is a woman from [the tribe of] Kalb then that would have been a sufficient virtue for you over him, how then when your mother is Fatima daughter of the Messenger of Allah (Salah Allah ‘Alaihi wa Salam) [Al-Sharee'ah by Al-Ajurri, died in 360 AH] امـّا الحسين فـقـد عـرفـت حظّه مـن رسول الله و هو مـن لحم رسول اللّه و دمـه و قـد عـلمـت لا مـحالة انّ اءهل العراق سيخرجونه اليهم ثمّ يخذلونه و يضيّعـونه ، فـان ظفـرت به فـاعـرف حقـّه و مـنزلة مـن رسول اللّه و لا تـواءخـذه بفـعـله ، و مـع ذلك فـانّ لنا به خلطة و رحما و ايّاك ان تناله بسوء او يرى منك مكروها. - بحار ج 44 / ص 311-. حيات الامـام الحسين ج 2، ص 236. كامل ابن اثير ج 4، ص 6. طبرى ج 7، ص 196 و 217. ينابيع الموده ص 333. Muawiya(ra) said to his son:“You know what relation Imâm Husayn ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ is to the Messenger of Allah. He is a part from the beloved Prophet’s blessed body. He is an offspring from the flesh and blood of that most honourable person. I understand that the inhabitants of Iraq invite him to go there and be with them. But they will not help him; they will leave him alone. If he should fall into your hands, behave in appreciation of his value! Remember the closeness and affection of the Messenger of Allah ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’ to him! Do not get back at him for his behaviour! Mind you don’t break the substantial ties I have established between him and us! Be extra careful lest you should hurt or offend him!” This advice of Hadrat Mu’âwiya’s to (his son) Yazîd is written in shia books like bihar al anwar, etc).] so the narration of saad is not about cursing and as for second one it does not show explicitely that Muavia ra was involved in such an act.

these are words of Imam Zohri. and It is not a hujjat on ahlesunnat . secondly plz read Tohfa-e-Hussainiya by Ashraf Sialvi vol 3 u will get the complete answer.

1st rawaayat Ibn-e-Qutaiba dinoori shia tha. 2nd rawayat Shia motzilli ibn-abi-Hadeed ki rwayat ya qaul hum per hujjat nahin aur tibari ki rwayat k rawi majhool r shia han, 3rd rwayat ibn-e abdurba ki uqad ul farid aik novel tha jis ma waqiat ko bila sanad zikar kiya gya lihaza hujjat nahin aur abi al fida shia tha. 4th rwayat jis ko sunni bna k pesh kiya ja raha hai aik majhool shakhsiyat hai aur ye rwayat bhi aik batil rwayat hai. 5th rawayat sy ye sabit nahin hota k ap ny waqia e ghr jalaya tha. aur mohsin ka qatal kiya tha. 6th rawayat al imamah wa il siyasa shia rafdi ki kitab hai. 7th rawayat shairon aur adeebon ki baat kia sach hoti hai ? Hamary nazdeek koi hujjat nahin aur jb k ye Sabeqoon al awwaloon ki shan k sakht khilaf hai aur bina sanad k to koi baat hujjat nahin hoti. 8th rawayat: shehistani mashoor shia tha. 9th rawayat: poori sanad aur poori ibarat naqal krty to bat wazeh ho jati jb k sanad k lihaz sy sakhat zaeef hai to kesy qabil e hujjat? 10 th rawayat: kisi ka zaati qaul jis ki koi bunyad nahin wo hum ahlesunnat py hujjat nahin aur is ma ghr jalany ka aur Hazrat mohsin ko shaheed krny ka koi tazkira nahin hai. 11th rawayatL: masoodi aik cutter shia rafdi tha . 12th riwayat: Ibn abi ul hadeed shia wazir k hukam sy sharah likhny wala tabbarai tha jo k ahlesunnat sy kharij lihaza iska hawala ahlesunnat py hujjat nahin. doosri daleel k liye zara saheeh sanad wali rawayat to koi pesh kr den jnab.. al gharaz tamam rawayat jo pesh ki gai han wo batil o mozuu hain aur in sy Ahlesunnat py koi ehtraz nahin aata q k ye books ya rawayat k rawi shia thy.

Namaz-e-Janaza ki takbeerat 4 wajib hain ..aik shia aalim Syed Zafar Hasan Imrohi naqvi trjuma Asool-e-Kafi (assh shafi)ma likhta hai k Namaz-e-Janaza main 4 takbeerat wajib hain. Ye aik shia aalim ki zubani Haq ka Ehtraf hai. Kia shia ab bhi Hazrat Umar r.a py Ilzam rakhen gy k Unhon ny Deen ma tabdeeli farmai thi maa'z Allah. (Ash-Shafi :jild2 page 252)