
Ya Allah Madad
-
کل پوسٹس
351 -
تاریخِ رجسٹریشن
-
آخری تشریف آوری
پوسٹس ںے Ya Allah Madad کیا
-
-
OK SAG E ATTAR
Malik Sahab ye hamare aik dost ka challanging article hay aap logon ke liye ..aaj tak koi qadyani iska jawab nahi day saka:
In the Name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful, The One and Only.
His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad, after whom there is no Prophet, and upon his family and Companions. Insha Allah, Masha Allah
CAN AHMADIS/QADIANIS ANSWER?
by Illias Suttar
Cash Reward: 10,000,000/ - (approx. US$ 250,000.00)
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims of Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah
have now been proven conclusively false.
If anyone can prove the points of this article to be wrong in the Supreme Court of any reputed country like UK, USA, German, Japan, Pakistan, India, Israel, etc., he will receive cash reward of Pak Rs.10,000,000/- (Ten Million).
You can prove my arguments wrong in the supreme court of any country like USA, UK, Israel, India, Pakistan, Germany, France, Italy, etc.
You can prove my arguments wrong even in my absence!!!
A Qadiani / Ahmadi judge is also acceptable even in my absence!!!
The first Qadiani / Ahmadi to make the case against me will get cash reward Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) before the start of the arguments.
In Pakistani newspapers, I have advertised that if any Qadiani / Ahmadi will come to me for discussions, I will pay Rs. 500/- cash to him.
If any non-Ahmadi / Qadiani brings an Ahmadi / Qadiani, then he will get Rs.500/- cash for bringing the Ahmadi / Qadiani.
Introductory Notes
Alhamdolillah, they have been intellectually defeated. A Prominent Ahmadi, Mr. Ahmad Baksh Channa, a Qadiani Murabbi for years, has embraced Islam along with other several others who witnessed the written debate.
In the following article, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani’s claim of being the Mahdi and the Promised Messiah have been conclusively proven to be wrong, by bringing to light contradiction in his own argument from his books. The particular argument of Mirza Sahib which was claimed to be dazzling like the sun, and according to his followers made his opponents ran way from him like lambs run away from lion, has been proven wrong beyond doubt. Since the fallacy of these claims have been exposed, Mirza Sahib’s claim of being a Nabi or a Prophet also automatically becomes bogus. A True Nabi cannot make false claim.
This article was originally made public, before 1982. More than 16 years have passed but no one has been able to deny the points of this article or prove the contrary. The points of this article have been twice put to the present IVth "Khalifa", Mirza Tahir Ahmad Qadiani, but he has maintained complete silence. I even went inside the Ahmadiyya Hall, an Ahmadi Center in Magazine Line, Karachi, where I distributed this article in the hall and spoke to those who were coming inside to pray. I attended the funeral of one learned Qadiani. In the graveyard, as well as in the funeral bus while coming back, I explained the article to them. On 4-7-1983, Mr. Rahim Younus Qadiani wrote from Dhaka, Bangladesh, that one learned Ahmadi is going to answer to me. Almost 15 years have passed away, but till now there is no answer. Naseem Ahmad, gave a reply to "Can Ahmadis Answer?" and entitled it, "An Ahmadi Answers". The grandson of the "Khalifa" Mirza Tahir, Mubasshir Ahmad composed it on the computer. However, later on, after nearly 5 hours of discussions, the grandson said that now only he has understood the question. He promised to return with proper reply. He went away never to return again.
I have had written discussions with many other Qadianis as well. Those who are interested can get copies of such correspondence from me. It is interesting to see how they have expressed views opposite to what Mirza Sahib has written. Many Qadianis have even admitted that Mirza Sahib has made a mistake, but they take the plea that Mirza Sahib was a human being and so he could make a mistake. However, time will make them realize, Insha Allah, that it wasn’t a small mistake. This grave mistake was committed while trying to prove his claims to the office of Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah. If the arguments put forward to prove his claim have been proven wrong, naturally the claim was also wrong. If one claim is wrong the whole Ahmadiyyat becomes a heap of debris.
I had offered Rs. One Crore (10,000,000) to any Ahmadi who will defeat me in any Supreme Court. One Ahmadi, Naseem Ahmad of Karachi, accused me that One Crore will not be paid, if I loose the case. He said that, to start the case, Rs.15,000/- cash will be needed. I even offered Rs.15,000/- in advance, which he refused to accept. Did he knew in his heart that he will be a loser?
The facts mentioned in this article, which have embarrassed Qadianis during the discussions, are taken from the following four books of Mirza Sahib:
Masih Hindustan Mein
Chasma-e-Masihi
Anjam-e-Atham
Kashti-e-Nuh
An interesting development is that the present "Khalifa" of Qadianis has warned his followers about me. He spoke for more than two hours on their so-called Muslim Television Ahmadiyya and cautioned the Qadianis that a "Fitna" (temptation) is going to come. To save the faith from that "Fitna" (temptation), he reminded his followers of miracles which were to be remembered when facing the "Fitna" (temptation). Mentioning Zia ul Haq’s plane accident, he claimed that this accident happened to Zia ul Haq because of what he had done to the Qadianis.
Obviously, it is an intellectual defeat for the "Khalifa" and the whole Ahmadiyya Community. Instead of coming up with logical arguments to counteract my proofs, the "Khalifa" has taken refuge in so-called miracles. Miracles or perhaps some Accident? Allah knows best. I am producing this article here with a challenge to all Qadianis / Ahmadis. Try to prove my arguments wrong in a Court of Law and get Pak. Rs.10,000,000/-.
Extract from Daily Newspaper ‘Inqilab’ Karachi, Pakistan of 27th December 1997 in which the reporter gave an interview of an important Ahmadi / Qadiani:
"Illias Suttar is in such a way after us as if he has nothing else to do. For a long time we gave him no lift thinking that it does not matter if someone keeps on barking. But now it seems as if he will not only bark but will bite us. And we will have to take 14 injections to save our lives. We Qadianis and Ahmadis are so scared of Illias Suttar as if he is a ghost…… Illias Suttar is not wanting any property from us, he is just wanting an answer to his article: 'Can Ahmadis / Qadianis Answer?'"
On 12/12/1997, Chowdhry Mobasshir Ahmadi who is the grandson of the "Khalifa" of Ahmadis / Qadianis said in the presence of 5 or 6 persons in the shop of Mr. Aslam in Qartaba Market, Bahadurabad, Karachi: "Announce on my behalf: I will give a fantastic reply – but there is no time limit".
On 2/3/1998, I (Illias Suttar) accompanied by Sarwar Rao, Chief Editor, Monthly Newsnet (International), Karachi, went to Al Noor Hall in Gulberg, Karachi, which is the prayer place (mosque) of Ahmadis / Qadianis). I met the Imam Sahib whose name is Mr. Dawood. I asked him to start a case in any supreme court to prove wrong the points of my article. He replied that "We do not recognise the judges of the earth. We have left the decision (on Illias Suttar’s article) in the Hands of the Judge in the sky"!
In the Name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful, The One and Only.
His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad, after whom there is no Prophet, and upon his family and Companions.
Insha Allah, Masha Allah
CAN AHMADIS/QADIANIS ANSWER?
by Illias Suttar
Cash Reward: 10,000,000/ - (approx. US$ 250000.00)
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims of Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah
have now been proven conclusively false.
Cash Reward Rs: 10,000,000/- (approx. US$ 250,000.00)
Main Article
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad rejected the fundamental Muslim doctrine of the second coming of Hazrat Isa ibne Maryam. Instead, he claimed that Hazrat Isa had died his natural death and even claimed to have located his grave in Khanyar Street, Srinagar, Kashmir. Mirza Sahib wrote a book "Jesus in India" where he gave a detailed account of what he claimed to have actually happened at the cross. According to him Jesus was put to the cross by the Jews on Friday; Jesus fainted and Jews thought that he had died. He was buried; but three days later, he regained consciousness and came out of the grave. He was 33 years old at that time. He met his disciples and secretly migrated to India, where he died at the age of 120 years. Let us have a look at the following extracts from this book:
"Hence, I shall prove in this book that Jesus (Peace be upon him) did not die on the cross neither did he go up to the heavens nor it should ever be hoped that he will return to the earth from the heavens; rather, he died at the age of 120 years in Srinagar in Kashmir, and his grave is in the Khanyar Region of Srinagar."
(Maseeh Hindustan Mein, (Jesus in India) Roohani Khazain, vol.15, p.14)
"Authentic narrations of hadith prove that our holy Prophet (pbuh) said in the person of Jesus two such qualities were combined which were not present in any other prophet. Firstly, he lived his full life, i.e. he was alive for 125 years. Secondly, he toured most of the parts of the world…now it is obvious if he had ascended to heavens at the age of only 33 years, then the tradition of 125 years would not have been correct, neither he could have toured at such a young age of 33. These traditions are not only mentioned in the authentic and ancient books of hadith, but they are so popular among all the sects of Muslims that none can be imagined more famous."
(Maseeh Hindustan Mein {Jesus in India}, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, pp. 55-56)
Christian Era (AD) begins with the birth of Hazrat Isa ibne Maryam (Jesus) in 1 AD. Hazrat Isa, according to Mirza Sahib, died at the age of 120 years, meaning 120 AD. Now, let us examine the following extract from "Anjam-e-Atham", written by Mirza Sahib:
"The Holy Quran clearly says that the Masih was lifted to the heavens after his death. Therefore his descent is symbolic and not real. And in the verse ‘Falamma Tawaffeteni’ it has been clearly manifested that death of Hazrat Isa (pbuh) has already taken place. Because the meaning of the verse is that the Christians will go astray after the death of Hazrat Isa (pbuh) and not during his lifetime. So if we assume that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) is not yet dead, then we will have to agree that the Christians are not yet digressed, and this is absolutely false. Rather the verse is saying that the Christians remained faithful only until the life-time of Hazrat Isa (pbuh). From this it becomes known that corruption had already begun during the time of Disciples. If the period of the Disciples had been such that the Christians had still been on right path, then in this verse Allah would not have linked it with the life-time of Hazrat Isa (pbuh) only, but would have included the life time of the disciples as well. Thus at this juncture a very good point of the period of corruption in Christianity is illustrated and which is that IN TRUTH, during the time of the Disciples themselves, the seeds of SHIRK (associating partner with God) were sown in Christianity.
(Anjam-e-Atham, Roohani Khazain, vol. 11, p.321)
The important points from the above extracts are:
Mirza Sahib claims to give proof from hadith that Hazrat Isa died at the age of 125.
He asserts that Christians were on right path only during the life time of Hazrat Isa.
He states that Hazrat Isa was not made God or son of God during his life time.
Seeds of SHIRK (Trinity) were sown after the death of Hazrat Isa. During the life time of Hazrat Isa, there was no possibility of such a digression. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed is quoting the verse "Falamma Tawaffeteni" (5:117) from Quran, implying that Allah is guaranteeing protection from such corruption (Shirk i.e. Trinity) during the life of Hazrat Isa only.
Since Mirza Sahib has stated in his book "Jesus in India" that Hazrat Isa died in 120 AD, the seeds of association of Partners with Allah (i.e. Trinity) could not have been planted before 120 AD. This means that Hazrat Isa was made God and son of God only after the year 120 A.D. Before 120 A.D., not even one single individual could have held the belief that Hazrat Isa is God or son of God.
Thus, the year of 120 A.D. became a turning point.
(Chasma-e-Maseehi, Roohani Khazain, vol. 20, p.375)
"And in the very first instance, he (Paul) implanted the bad seedling of Trinity in Damascus. And this Pauline Trinity started from Damascus. It is towards this that hadith Shareef has hinted that the future Maseeh will descend on the eastern side of Damascus."
(Chasma-e-Maseehi, Roohani Khazain, vol. 20, p.377)
In this book, Chasma-e-Maseehi, Mirza Sahib has clearly stated that St. Paul was responsible for the doctrine of Holy Trinity and thus turning Hazrat Isa into God. It is a well known fact that St. Paul died in 64 AD or 67 AD. The book ‘The 100’ gives the year of his death as 64 AD. Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics says:
"That he suffered martyrdom at Rome there can be no doubt…the date will lie between A.D. 64 and 67, most probably nearer the former than the later limit."
(Encyclopaedia, vol. 9, p.694)
Final Arguments
In the book "Jesus in India", according to Mirza Sahib, Hazrat Isa died in 120 AD.
In the book "Anjam-e-Atham", Mirza Sahib has clearly stated that the seeds of Trinity were not sown until 120 A.D.
In the book "Anjam-e-Atham", Mirza Sahib has clearly said that St. Paul made Hazrat Isa God.
Paul died in 64 or 65 A.D. where as Hazrat Isa died in 120 A.D. Therefore Paul died at least 55 years before Hazrat Isa. (Jesus)
Since Paul must have given the doctrine of Trinity during his life time, this means the Hazrat Isa was made God at least 55 years before his own death. In other words, by 65 A.D. Hazrat Isa was made God/Son of God while he died 55 years later in 120 A.D.
While he (Jesus) was alive in Kashmir, he was being worshipped as God in Palestine.
Thus Mirza Sahib’s commentary on the Holy Quran’s verse 5:117 (Falamma Tawaffetenni) in his book "Anjam-e-Atham", that Christians made Hazrat Isa God after the death of Hazrat Isa in 120 A.D., becomes absolutely wrong.
Is this a small mistake for a man claiming to have been divinely ordained to be Messiah, Mahdi and a Prophet? Such a grievous error? So obviously and utterly wrong! So conclusively wrong!
On Page 135 of his book "Anjam Atham", Mirza Ghulam Ahmed says:
"If Jesus is alive in the heavens, then the Christians must be on the right path (on earth)".
Will the Qadianis / Ahmadis reflect?
(Please see point no. 6 above.)
If Mirza Sahib were alive and this question had been put to him, could he have said: "I am a human being and I can make mistakes"? Mirza Sahib had claimed help of Allah in these arguments. Can Allah be wrong? No! Only the claim of Mirza Sahib is wrong. If he can be wrong in one thing, what proof is there that he is not wrong in other things? The reason for Mirza Saheb's entire exercise of trying to prove that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) had died was to establish his own claim of being the Promised Messiah and Mahdi. His argument was that, since Hazrat Isa has died, he will not return, as that would be against the principles of Allah. Thus, someone else will have to take up the role of Hazrat Isa and that someone is none other than Mirza Sahib himself! However, the above arguments have proven conclusively that Mirza Ghulam could not substantiate his claim of being Imam Mahdi and the Promised Messiah. Therefore, he is neither Imam Mahdi nor the Promised messiah. As a corollary, he is not a Prophet, because a true Prophet will not make a false claim. Q.E.D., Q.E.D., Q.E.D., Q.E.D., Q.E.D.
Another Interesting Point
He secretely migrated to India, lived there for 87 more years, and died at the age of 120 in Srinagar, Kashmir. He kept no contact with the people of Palestine for these 87 years. People in Palestine did not know that Hazrat Isa was alive in Kashmir and Hazrat Isa did not know that the people in Palestine had begun to worship him as God and son of God. Therefore, (according to Qadiani claims) in the original land (Palestine) where he was sent as Messenger and where he was made God and son of God, he kept careful watch only till the age of 33 and for the remaining 87 years of his life he kept no watch over them at all! What a glaring mistake (in tafseer)!
Remember: All this is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani’s assertions and we have only his words for them. Will the Qadianis, his followers, kindly clarify the above points or rectify their belief?
May Allah help them to understand what is right and what is wrong and give them the courage to follow the right path. Ameen.
All praise to Allah. His Love and Peace be upon His Noble Prophet, Hazrat Muhammad and upon His family and Companions.
Sir Syed vs Mirza Saheb
The Qadiyanis are very proud of saying that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib was the first man after so many years who said that Jesus (Hazrat Isa) (pbuh) did not go to the heavens ,but died on earth in Kashmir. Mr. Nasim Ahmad, who wrote "An Ahmadi Answers", said that Mirza Sahib first came to know from Allah about Hazrat Isa’s natural death on earth in the year 1891.
Mr. Nasim Ahmad should know that Sir Syed had made a similar claim 9 years before, in the year 1882, in his Tafsir of Quran Majid.
Sir Syed wrote his Tafsir of Quran Majid in 6 volumes as follows (see page 335 of the book "Sir Syed Ahmad Khan" by Fazal Karim):
Part 1 in year 1880
Part 2 in year 1882
Part 3 in year 1885
Part 4 in year 1886
Part 5 in year 1892
Part 6 in year 1895
In part no.2, year 1882, in Sura Maida, verse no. 117, Sir Syed layed claim to the death of Hazrat Isa (pbuh).
9 years later in 1891, Mirza Saheb copied Sir Syed. Is it in good taste that Qadiayanis are boasting today about Mirza Sahib's plagiarism?
In the name of Allah, The Most Compassionate, The Most Merciful, The One and Only.
His Love and Peace be upon Syedna Muhammad, after whom there is no Prophet, and upon his family and Companions.
Insha Allah, Masha Allah
CAN AHMADIS/QADIANIS ANSWER?
by Illias Suttar
More Contradictions
I wish Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Sahib were Alive!
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian claimed to be Imam Mahdi and Promised Messiah, Two in One. It is an accepted Muslim doctrine that Hazrat Isa (Jesus) (pbuh) will descend from heavens and will help Imam Mahdi in the propagation of Islam and fill the world with justice. When people asked Mirza Ghulam about Jesus, the son of Mary, Mirza Sahib replied that Jesus will not descend from heavens because he never went to heavens; rather he went to Kashmir, where he died at the age of 120! In support of his claim, Mirza Sahib wrote a book called ‘Messiah in India (Maseeh in Hindustan)’.
Quran says celibacy not prescribed in Christianity, but Mirza Sahib says the opposite.
Mirza Sahib says:
"And just as Injeel has preached celibacy, similarly in Buddha’s teachings it is desired; and just as an earthquake came on putting the Jesus to the cross, similarly it is written that an earthquake came on the death of Buddha. Thus the main reason for all such similarities is that out of good fortune for the Buddhists, Maseeh came to Hindustan and stayed for a long time amongst Buddhists and they received detailed knowledge on his life and his preachings. Consequently it was inevitable that a great part of that teaching and ceremonials should have found its way into Buddhists records for Jesus was respected and taken for the Buddha by the Buddhists These people therefore recorded his sayings in their books and ascribed them to the Buddha."
(Maseeh Hindustan Mein, Roohani Khazain, vol.15, P.78)
On the other hand, the Holy Quran says (57:27) that monasticism was invented by Christians. Monasticism includes all ways of detaching oneself from mankind, specially state of celibacy:
"Then We caused Our messengers to follow in their footsteps; and We caused Jesus, son of Mary, to follow, and gave him the Gospel, and placed compassion and mercy in the hearts of those who followed him. But monasticism they invented - We ordained it not for them - only seeking Allah’s pleasure, and they observed it not with right observance. So, We give those of them who believed their reward, but many of them are evil-livers." (al-Quran 57:27)
But contrary to this verse, Mirza Sahib says that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) preached the doctrine of Chastity and Celibacy. Who is to be believed? The Holy Quran or the word of Mirza Ghulam?
Hazrat Isa pbuh - Prophet for Bani Israel or Prophet for Buddhists?
Bagwa Matteyya, whose other name was Maseeh came to this land, because the failure of a prophecy makes that religion bogus."
(Maseeh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol 15, p.84)
"Every Buddhist must necessarily profess the belief that five hundred years after the Buddha, the Bagwa (white) Metteyya did appear in their land."
(Maseeh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, p.92)
"There can be no doubt that he came in the colours of Buddha and the Book of Oldenburg with reference to Buddha’s Book, Lkavati Sutta, it is written that the followers of Buddha used to console themselves with the hope of future that they will achieve the fruits of salvation by becoming the follower of Metteyya. i.e. they had confidence that Metteyya will appear among them and they will attain salvation through him, because the words in which Buddha had given them the hope of Metteyya they were clearly proving that his followers will meet Metteyya. Now with this statement of this book, confidence is generated in the heart that God had created means of their guidance from both sides…and no one can doubt that those moral teachings and spiritual ways which were established by Buddha, the teachings of Hazrat Maseeh have regenerated them in this world."
(Maseeh in India, Roohani Khazain vol. 15 pp. 81-82)
How could Hazrat Isa (pbuh) go to preach among non-Bani Israel on the basis of divine revelation of Buddha? Is this not against our and your faith which states that Hazrat Isa (PBUH) was sent to Bani Israel only? To further clarify that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) went to all Buddhists whether they were Israelites or not, Mirza Sahib quotes Buddha as saying that Hazrat Isa (pbuh) will come from outside to the land of Prophecy, Magadh, in which the people were dark. And Buddha himself was dark. And since all the Buddhists are included in this prophecy, common sense says that non-Israelites are also included, since all Buddhists were not Israelites.
Another Hypocrisy of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
(Maseeh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, p.81)
Gospel of Barnabas and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Ignorance
Mirza Sahib says:
"After all that has been stated, it should be kept in mind that the Gospel of Barnabas, which must be available in the British Museum, it is stated that Jesus was not crucified nor did he die on the Cross. Now we can very well say though this book is not included in the Gospels and has been rejected summarily, yet there is no doubt that it is an ancient book and it belongs to the period in which the other Gospels were written. Is it not open to us to regard this ancient book as a book of history of ancient times and make use of it as a book of history?"
(Masseh in Hindustan, Roohani Khazain, vol. 15, p.21)
Perhaps Mirza Sahib did not read the Gospel of Barnabas himself, for in the Bible of Barnabas, it is clearly mentioned that Hazrat Muhammad (SAAW) will be the last Prophet, and only false Prophets will come after him. Please see the following extract from the Bible of Barnabas:
"Isa (pbuh) said in that Messenger’s coming who will wipe out all false ideas about me. His religion will spread all over the earth. Sardar Kahin asked: After the coming of the Messenger of God will more Prophets come? Isa(pbuh) said: After him not true Prophet will come. But many false Prophets will come."
(Gospel of Barnabas, Urdu Edition, p. 143)
"Then the disciples asked: O Master, who is that man who you mention will come to earth? With great happiness Isa (pbuh) replied: He is Muhammad (SAAW), Messenger of Allah. When he will come, just as rain brings out fruits from earth when there has been no rain for a long time, in the same way with the unlimited Mercy and Blessings with which he will come, he will be the cause of many good and virtuous deeds."
(Gospel of Barnabas, p.228, Urdu Version)
Mirza Sahib admits that the gospel of Barnabas is an ancient historical document, written at the same time as other Gospels. He presents one of its statements to support his claim. But what he didn’t know was that it not only mentions the coming of Hazrat Muhammad (SAAW), but also the finality of his Prophethood or did he? If he had, what right did Mirza Ghulam have to claim that he is a Prophet? Why did he take one statement as a proof and ignored the other one. Perhaps he had never read the Gospel!
Is Adam (pbuh) still alive? Did Mirza Sahib die at the age of 30?
"There is another important statement by the Holy Prophet. During his last illness, the Holy Prophet said to his daughter Fatima: ‘Once a year Gabriel used to recite the Quran to me. This year he recited twice. He also told me that every succeeding Prophet has lived up to half the age of his predecessor. He told me that Jesus, son of Mary, lived to 120 years. Therefore, I think, I may live to about 60 years."
(Invitation to Ahmadiyyat (Da’awat-ul-Ameer), p.17)
Based on this formula, some of the future prophets (if at all there are some, and there should be at least three of them if you accept the Qadiani interpretation of the verse of Khatme-Nabuwwat) will have following ages:
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani ??? 30 years old
Next assumed prophet 15 years old
Next assumed prophet 7 and half years old…and so on.
So according to the extract on page 17 taken from "Invitation to Ahamadiyyat", Hazrat Adam (pbuh) should have lived up to 122880 years. Which means that he is still alive. In fact, even Hazrat Sheesh, Noah, Abrahim and Ismail (pbut) should all be alive now. Furthermore, if Mirza Sahib is a prophet, he should have died at the age of 30 only, that is half the age of the previous Prophet. Did Mirza Sahib become Prophet after his death? Still more interesting, if Prophets will continue to come, then just a few Prophets down the line we would be having one who is a newborn!! This statement of the Holy Prophet (SAAW), if at all authentic, clearly means that there will no Prophet after Hazrat Muhammad
, because the next Prophet will have to die at the age of 30 and the next at 15 which means he will not even be an adult.
-
Fancy SHIA's Grave
- فورم: فتنہ شیعہ
Mirchi kuch zyada ho gayi meri last post meusi ka radd e amal taqiybaaz Deo ne dikhaya khair...
Ek phatky me hi aapko Wali Allah ki tareef bhi yaad aa gayi or foran Wali Allah ka tayyun kis tarah kiya jaye is par jo aapny apni last post me Barelwis par bohtaan tarashi ki thi ke ye to Allah se bhi sabqat lene lagy hain...usko bhi nakar diya la ilmi me hi sahil....to kya khayal hai ab apny bary me? Abhli last post me to wahabi keh raha tha ki Ambiya or ashra mubasshira ke alawa kisi ko Allah ka wali ya jananati samjhna jayaz nahin...
Aap kya samajhty hain kya humy ye tareef maloom nahin jo hum jisy chahy Allah ka wali kehty phirty hain? par aap jab tak barelwis par jhooty ilzaam na laga lein aapka hazam theek nahin hota...
-
ye mafoqulbashari kya hota hai?
-
abhi upar khud accept kiya ke imaan or muttaqi Allah ka wali hota hai....or Ab khud hi usko jhutla raha hai?
-
wali Allah ke martaby hoty hain...shayd wahabis ko ilm nahin...sab muttaqi barabar nahin...jo jitna muttaqi hoga utna hi Allah ka muqarrab hoga or utna hi bara buzurg or wali..
wah re Wahabi...agar hawala nahin to phir kis mu se tuny ye hadees paish ki...hum hawaly ke saath hadeesein paish karein to tumhy qubool nahin hoti or aaj apni jan bachnay ke liye be hawala hadees paish kar raha hai?
or jo ismy tumny likha ki sirf kuffaro se Allah ki jang hai...mana ye ki ye hadees sirf kuffaro ke liye hai tum jasiy kalima go Wahabi Deo ke liye nahin jo ja baja owliya ikram ko tanqees ka nishana banaty rehty hain..wah re beghairat...
Ma fauq ul bashari kehte hein koi bohot hi special kisim ka aadmi jis mein wo sifaat hoon ke jo aam insaano mein nhai ho sakti..jaysay tumharay mazar walay buzurg..jin mein Allah ki qualaities badarjaha hein..peentare badalna to koi barlvion se seekhe ..pehlay mazar wale log Wali Allah the sirf...Jab bataya to pentara badla ye to humko pata hay..aur ye kam ya ziyada taqwa wali mantaq aap kahan se laye..yani jo kam taqwe ala hoga uski normal qabar banegi aur jo ziyada taqwe wala hoga uska mazar banega..hai bralvi teri aqal..teray pass taqwa naapne ka pemaana bhi hay..woww..aur jo kam emaan wala aur taqwa wala hoga wo noramal wali Allah hay..aur jo ziyada emaan wala aur taqwe wala hoga..usmein Allah ki qualities aa jaingi..wo hazir o nazir bhi ho jaega..aalim ul ghaib bhi ho jaehga..puri kainaat ka mushahida aik hi jagah se karta hoga..mushkil kusha bhi ho jaega..
Aur hum jo dunya mein faislay kar lete hein ye to wali Allah hay shaheed hay falan falan..ye sab zahir he marne wale ka batin kia tha wo qayamat mein khulega..ye hadees parh lo.
:
On the authority of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (PBUH) say:
The first of people against whom judgment will be pronounced on the Day of Resurrection will be a man who died a martyr. He will be brought and Allah will make known to him His favours and he will recognize them. [ The Almighty] will say: And what did you do about them? He will say: I fought for you until I died a martyr. He will say: You have lied - you did but fight that it might be said [of you]: He is courageous. And so it was said. Then he will be ordered to be dragged along on his face until he is cast into Hell-fire. [Another] will be a man who has studied [religious] knowledge and has taught it and who used to recite the Quran. He will be brought and Allah will make known to his His favours and he will recognize them. [The Almighty] will say: And what did you do about them? He will say: I studied [religious] knowledge and I taught it and I recited the Quran for Your sake. He will say: You have lied - you did but study [religious] knowledge that it might be said [of you]: He is learned. And you recited the Quran that it might be said [of you]: He is a reciter. And so it was said. Then he will be ordered to be dragged along on his face until he is cast into Hell-fire. [Another] will be a man whom Allah had made rich and to whom He had given all kinds of wealth. He will be brought and Allah will make known to his His favours and he will recognize them. [The Almighty] will say: And what did you do about them? He will say: I left no path [untrodden] in which You like money to be spent without spending in it for Your sake. He will say: You have lied - you did but do so that it might be said [of you]: He is open-handed. And so it was said. Then he will be ordered to be dragged along on his face until he is cast into Hell-fire.
It was related by Muslim (also by at-Tirmidhi and an-Nasa'i).
Allah hi hafiz he tum logon ka.
-
-
Fancy SHIA's Grave
- فورم: فتنہ شیعہ
Allahka wali kon hai or kon nahin ( Ambiya or ashra mubashshara ko chor sary sahaba, tabaeen, tab e tabaeen, shohda, Muhaddiseen, Mufassireen, Fuqha, Mohaqiqeen, Ulema e ikram, buzurgan e deen agar owliya nahin to kya aap jaisy taqiya baaz Deobandi ke buzurg owliya kehlayengy? ya phir aapka imam Mohammad bin abdul wahab?
ye beghairati aap jaiso ko hi mubarak...or agar aapki humari muntaq par aitraaz hai to phir zara apky is aitraaz se jo mazeed sawaal khary hoty hain unka jawab la dein...
agar apky mutabiq bando ko is baat ka kuch bhi ilm nahin ki kon Allah ka wali hai or kon nahin or iksa pata roz e qayamat hi hoga to phir is Hadees e Qudsi ke aap Munkir qaraar payengy bcz jab aapko ilm hi nahin ki kon Allah ka wali ho sakta hai or kon nahin to phir aap kis tarah is hadees me aayi waeed se apni hifazat duniya or akherat me kar payegny....? Aaap kis tarah Allah ke wali se adawat se ijtenaab kar payengy...? goya Qayamat ko aap yahi langra sa uzar paish kar dijyega ki hum wahabis ke yahan to koi Wali Allah paida nahin hua to humy kese pata chalta ki wali ki kya sifat hoti hain...? jab humy pata hi nahin tha ki kon tera wali tha kon nahin to humny sab ko khoob galiyan bakin, sabko khoob bura bhala kaha, sabki shan me khoob gustakhiyan kari, sabsy khoob adawat ki, ab hum jahil thy to ismy humara (Deobandi-wahabis) ka kya Qusoor? Ya phir aapky is bewaqoofana si post ka hasil kalam ye hoga ki Allah ne aapko aisy umoor se bachny ka hukm diya hai jis se bachny par aap qadir hi nahin?
wah re Taqiya baaz Deobandi!!
Shor karne aur uchalne koondne se kuch nahi hota...wahabi deobandi ka rona peetna karke kuch hasil nahi hoga..tum log bhi matam kia karo shia ki tarah..hai wahabi ..hai deobandi..hai hai hai...ro ro rote rahoo..qayamat tak rote raho gay..
Allah
ne humko har cheez ki tafseel batai hay..pehlay zara is baat ko samjh lo ke Aulia Allah kis ko kaha hay Allah ne..
أَلاَ إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاءَ اللَّهِ لاَ خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلاَ هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ (يونس: 62).
الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَكَانُوا يَتَّقُونَ (يونس: 63).
لَهُمُ الْبُشْرَى فِي الْحَيَاةِ الدُّنْيَا وَفِي الآخِرَةِ لاَ تَبْدِيلَ لِكَلِمَاتِ اللَّهِ ذَلِكَ هُوَ الْفَوْزُ الْعَظِيمُ (يونس:64)
Is ayat mein Allah ke dost ki 2 nishaanian batai gai hein..(Emaan) aur (Taqwa) aur hum dekhtay hein ke bazahir is ma'yar par bohot saray log hein jo pura utarte hein..beshumar log aesay hein jin mein ye qualities hein..ab zara is ayat ko aik tafseer ke zarye bhi samjh lo ke mufassiron ke nazdeek Wali Allah kon hay..
قوله تعالى: { أَلا إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاء ٱللَّهِ } يعني المؤمنين. ويقال: أحباء الله. وهم حملة القرآن والعلم. ويقال الذين يجتنبون الذنوب في الخلوات ويعلمون أن الله تعالى مطلع عليهم، وروي " عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أنه سئل عن أولياء الله تعالى فقال: «هم الذين (إذا رُؤوا) ذُكِرَ اللهُ تعالى " ، وقال وهب بن منبه: [قال] الحواريون لعيسى بن مريم يا روح الله من أولياء الله؟ قال الذين نظروا إلى باطن الدنيا حين نظر الناس إلى ظاهرها. ونظروا إلى آجل الدنيا حين نظر الناس إلى عاجلها فأحيوا ذكر الموت وأماتوا ذكر الحياة ويحبون الله تعالى ويحبون ذكره. وقال الضحاك: { أَلا إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاء ٱللَّهِ } يعني المخلصين لله { لاَ خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ } يعني: لا يخافون من أهوال يوم القيامة { وَلاَ هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ } حين زفرت جهنم، ثم نعتهم فقال تعالى { ٱلَّذِينَ ءامَنُواْ وَكَانُواْ يَتَّقُونَ } يعني أقروا وصدقوا بوحدانية الله تعالى ويتقون الشرك والفواحش { لَهُمُ ٱلْبُشْرَىٰ فِي ٱلْحَيوٰةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا } يعني البشارة وهي الرؤيا الصالحة يراها العبد المسلم لنفسه أو يرى له غيره. وروي عن عبد الله بن عمر عن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أنه قال: " الرؤيا الصالحة جزء من سبعين جزءاً من النبوة " ، وفي خبر آخر " من أربعين جزءاً " وفي خبر آخر " من ستة وأربعين جزءاً " وروى عطاء بن يسار " عن رجل كان يفتي بالبصرة، قال سألت أبا الدرداء عن هذه الآية { لَهُمُ ٱلْبُشْرَىٰ فِي ٱلْحَيوٰةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا } قال أبو الدرداء ما سألني عنها أحد منذ (سألت عنها رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - ) فقال «ما سألني عنها أحد قبلك. هي الرؤيا الصالحة يراها المسلم أوتُرى له " { وَفِي ٱلاْخِرَةِ } الجنة. وعن عبادة بن الصامت أنه سأل النبي -
* تفسير بحر العلوم/ السمرقندي (ت 375 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
Saaf tor se is tafseer mein kaha ja raha hay ke Aulia Allah se murad (MOMINEEN) hein..JO Allah se mohabbat kare.. Jo KHILWAT mein gunahon se bachtay hein aur ye jaante hein ke Allah unko dekh raha hay..Rasool Allah
se poocha giya ke AULIA ALLAH kon hein to unho ne jawab diya ke jis ko dekh kar Allah yaad aaey..Zahaak
kehte hein ke is se muraad (MUKHLISEEN) hein..
mein ne ye choti si detail is liye pesh ki ke Aulia Allah ka mafhoom wazeh ho jaey...agar aap ya koi bhi is ma'ayaar par pura utray ga wo Wali Allah hay..
Mera point ye hay ke is tashreese se ye clear ho giya ke WAli Allah kon log hote hein..Wo nahi hote jo aap logon ne MAFOQULBASHRI banaey hoye hein..Is tarah to ye dunya mazaron se bhar jaegi ..kay yahan to roz is dunya mein bohot saray log Emaan aur Taqway wale marte hein..
Ab is Hadees e Qudsi ka matlab samjh lo..iska koi hawala nahi hay mere pass ..
Jab Rasool Allah
ke zamane mein koi bhi emaan laata tha wo momineen ki jamaat mein shamil ho jata tha aur jab bhi koi musalman hota to kufaar uske dushman ho jate thay..aur unko aziyat dene lagte thay..Kionke wo momin ho chuka hay aur Rasool Allah
par emaan la chuka hay aur wo mukhlis bhi hay..to is ayat ke mutabiq wo Allah ka dost ban giya..Jab Allah
ne ye dekha ke mere Rasool par emaan lane walo se dushmani ki jati hay aur usko aziyat di jati hay to Allah
ne farmaya ke mera us se elaan e jang hay jo mere WALI se dushmani karega..Aaj bhi agar koi kafir musalman hota hay aur usko koi is baat par eeza deta hay aur us say dushmani karta hay to us say bhi Allah
ki jang hay..
-
Fancy SHIA's Grave
- فورم: فتنہ شیعہ
wahabi shab, agar app ka baap foot ho jay to mara nahee kahil kah app ko pata nahee chalay ga kay woo kasa shaks tha,, agar waqee main na pata chalay to apnay baqi ghar waloon say ya apnay baap kay ezeez dostoon say pata chal jay ga,
umeed karta hoon kah masla kafi had tak app kay zehan nasheen ho giya ho ga,,
Ya Muhammadah sahab ki mantaq parh kar mein hairaan ho giya ke hum log dunya hi mein faisla kar lete hein ke ye wali mara hay aur ye aam aadmi..phir usi hisaab se uski qabar banti hay..agar wo wali hay to pakki mazar wali nahi to katchi gabar banegi ..is liye ke to aam aadmi tha..hum ne yahan hi tera faisla kar liya hay ke tu wali Allah hay aur to aam insaan..wah wah Subhan Allah..yani bralvi ab qayamat se pehlay faislay bhi karne lagay..
ab zara quran ka faisla bhi sun lo..qayamat to shaed Allah ne aesay hi logon ko darane ke liye rakh di hay..faislay to saray hum ne dunya mein kar hi liye..Jiske mazar banane thay bana diye jinki aam qabar banani thi wo bhi kar diya..faisla ho giya..
هَذَا يَوْمُ الْفَصْلِ جَمَعْنَاكُمْ وَالأَوَّلِينَ (المرسلات: 38).
{ هَـٰذَا يَوْمُ ٱلْفَصْلِ } يعني: يوم القضاء ويقال يوم الفصل يعني بين أهل الجنة وبين أهل النار { جَمَعْنَـٰكُمْ وَٱلأَوَّلِينَ } يعني: جمعناكم يا أمة محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم
* تفسير بحر العلوم/ السمرقندي (ت 375 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
Is tafseer mein saaf tor se ye bataya ja raha hay ke ahle jannat aur dozakh ka faisla qayamat mein hoga..
Agar tum logon ke pass koi quran o hadees ka hawla hay ke Allah Ta'ala dunya mein Aulia Allah ka faisla kar dete hein to batao..Anbiya
aur Ashra Mubasharra
jo jannati hein inke ilawa jab Rasool
ne kisi ka faisla nahi kia to hum kaysay kar saktay hein..
Ziyada agay nahi barhana chahiye..Allah
par sabqat karna sakht gunnah hay..
hum kisi ke baray mein itna zaroor keh saktay hein ke bhala aadmi hay mein ne is mein kabhi koi burai nahi dekhi..magar jannat ka faisla qayamat mein hoga..aur isi tarah hum kisi ke bare mein keh sakte hein ke bohot bura aur badbakht aadmi hay ..magar ..iski jannat ya jahannam ka faisla qayamat mein hoga..Hum Allah
par sabqat nahi kar saktay ...
-
Aap nay joh ChistiQadriri bahi ko jawab likha thah meh nay us ka jawab apni pichli post meh be likh deeya heh.
Joh abhi aap nay likha heh meh us ka jawab bee likh doon ga. Abhi thora neend ker loon sari raat jagtay huway guzri heh din kay giraa ho chukay hen.
Umeed heh ujjay jawab complete kernay ka moqa denh gay. Inshallah jagnay kay baad dars e Aqeedah jaari rahay ga, umeed heh bacha log dars ko chor ker bagen gay nahin.
Sochtay raho aur dartay raho.
very funny
tumharay saamne koi bacha nahi hay.
-
Fancy SHIA's Grave
- فورم: فتنہ شیعہ
bohot mumkin hai ki wo kabr kisi isai ki ho..par issy maqsood nahin...masla hai aam logo ke liye pakki kabr banany is dusri kabro se mummyiaz or mumtaaz kakrny ya isy decorate karny ka ..Ahle Sunnat isy sirf kisi aisi shakhsiyat ke liye jayaz manty hain jo Deen me eham rutba rakta ho..jiska muqaam aam se khas ho...jaisy ulema e deen, Owliya izaam, Muhaddiseen, fuqha, Mufassireen, Ambiya ikram...aam musalman ki kabr pakki na banai jaye or na hi mumtaaz ki jaye dusri kabro se..
Sirf aik cheez poochni hay ke agar koi marta hay to humein kaysay pata chalay ke ye aam aadmi tha ya wali Allah tha..takay hum uski qabar phir usi hisaab say bnaein...Thank you
-
* Pehla point, Imam Raazi rahimullah alayhi tallah nay joh likha heh woh toh Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat ka aqeedah heh, kay logo meh Bashr hoon. RasoolAllah Bashr hen, aur jumla Tashbiya be heh, aur jumla Tasbhiyah meh qulli zaat o sifat ke tashbih nahin hoti sirf ek quality kee tashbih hoti heh aur ayaat: " sirf meh hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl." meh tashbih e Bashariat heh, yehni meh sirf Bashariat meh tumari jesa hoon, nabuwat, shahid, Noor, honay meh meri misl tum jesi nahin.
* Dosra point, Misliyat Tashbiyah meh ek quality ka zikr hota heh, aur RasoolAllah kay mukhatib kuffar hen, kehna kay meh tum jesa bashr hoon. Khilaaf e haqiqat heh, meray Nabi Kaffiroon jesay Bashr nahin, Bashr hen magir Kaffiroon jesay nahin, keyun kay yeh jumla Tashbih heh toh muraad kafiroon jesay Bashr ho gi, aur meray Rasool kee bashariat ko Kaffiroon kee bashariat say tashbih dena gustakhi, kuffr heh. Abh yeh kehna kay Abdul Wahab Najdi Firawn jesay insaan thah, Nimrood jesa Bashr thah, kia Ibnul Wahab Najdi kee shaan meh gustakhi nahin, us kee tankees nahin. Allah kesay hokam deh sakta heh kay Mehboob tum apnay aap ko Kaffiroon jesa Bashr kaho. Aur kohi be Ummati kohi be musalmaan RasoolAllah ko Kaffiroon jesa Bashr nahin likhay ga, ya apnay jesa bashr nahin likhay ga keyun kay apnay jesa kehna tashbih heh is meh tankees e Risalat hogi, buland martba nabi ko gatia say tashbih deeh gustakhi huwi, Ibnul Wahab ko Firawn jesa Bashr kaha toh us kee shaan meh gustakhi huwi RasoolAllah ko agir kohi apnay jesa bashr kahay toh gustakhi hogi, Abh Kaffir aur Najdi keh saktay hen kay woh ham jesay Bashr thay, Kaffir gustakhi kee niyat say keh sakta heh aur Wahabi bee keh sakta heh, agir ek Tawahif Ibnul Wahab Najdi kee wife kay mutaliq yeh kahay, kay Ibnul Wahab Najdi kee biwi ham jesi auraat thee, toh kia gustakhi ka pehloo nahin nikalta. Bilqul nikalta heh ho sakta heh kay woh us kee biwi ko tawahif keh rahi ho. Aur esay ilfaaz RasoolAllah kay leyeh bolna jin ka mafoom acha aur bura ho sakta ho, ijazat nahin, Allah tallah nay Raina jesay lafz kay istimal say rok deeya jis say gustakhi ke pehloo nikal sakta thah ... is leyeh RasoolAllah kee Bashariat ko Tashbih dena kay woh ham jesay Bashr hen gustakhi, aur ayaat kay mutabiq kaffur, aur kaffiroon ko bara azeem azaab hoga.
* Tesra point, RasoolAllah ko hokam keyun huwa kay aap keh denh kay kaffiro meh be tum jesa Bashr hoon, jab haqiqat yeh heh kay woh un jesay Bashr nahin, nah woh Kaffiroon kee sifaat bee nahin aur zaat bee nahin, Kaffir dunya meh anda heh aur meray Nabi jannat aur dozikh ko dekh raha heh, qabroon meh azaab kee awazen sun raha heh, un kee Bashariat Kaffiroon jesi kesay huwi, jab itna farq sabit ho gaya toh Bashariat kesay huwi Kaffiroon jesi, RasoolAllah Bashr toh hen magir Kaffiroon jesay Bashr nahin. Toh phir kia waja kay RasoolAllah ko hokam huwa kay aap keh denh kay meh sirf hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl! Dekhyeh jab haqiqat is kay barkhalaf heh, toh doh wajoohat ho saktay hen, ya Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah say jhoot bolwaya, ya phir Allah tallah nay aajzi, inkasari, tawazoh, humility, ka hokam deeya. Dekhyeh jab kohi professor, Kohi Aalim lecture kay shorron meh hamd o salat kay baad kehta heh, kay: "meh ek aanparh aadmi hoon, meh is lyke nahin kay yahanper khara ho ker biyaan keroon." Toh kia woh jhoot bol raha hota heh, nahin woh aajzi ker raha hota heh, jab kohi esi baat kahay joh haqiqat kay bar khalaf ho toh ya toh woh jhoot ho sakti heh ya phir aajzi, abh Allah jhoot ka hokam deta nahin aur RasoolAllah jhoot bolta nahin, toh yahee result heh kay yeh saray jumla Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah say aajzi, inkasar, tawazoh, humility, meh farmanay ka hokam deeya. Nah RasoolAllah kee zaat Kaffiroon jesi aur nah sifaat kaffiroon jesi, toh phir RAsoolAllah ka yeh farmana: "Sirf meh hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl." aajzi heh. Keyun kay jab kohi bara, apnay say jhootoon kay jesa honay ka farmahay toh mafoom aajzi hota heh. Qaazi Sana-ullah Pani'Pati apni Tafsir e Mazhari kee Soorat 18 Verse 110 per farmatay hen: "Hazrat Ibn Abbas radiallah tallah anh nay farmaya, Allah nay RasoolAllah ko Tawazoh kee taleem deeh taqay aap maghroor nah ho jahen aur hokam deeya kay aap apnay adami honay ka iqrar keren ...." Aur 41:6 meh yahee qaul Hassan {Basri rahimullah alayhi tallah} say mansoob keeya: "Hassan nay kaha Allah nay aap ko tawazoh kee taleem deeh yehni ..."
* chota point, Allah tallah nay farmaya heh Mehboob tum farma doh kay Bashar honay meh sirf meh tumari misl hoon, misliyat sirft ek quality meh hoti heh jesa kay sabit keeya heh, ants, chimptiyoon wali ayaat say last response meh. yeh be sabit ho gaya kay un kee Bashariat ham jesi nahin toh phir keyun farmaya kay meh tum jesa Bashr hoon, meh nay pehlay likha thah phir Tafsir pesh krta hoon:
"Toh matlab yeh nahin hoga kay RasoolAllah ham jesay Bashr hen, balkay Misli'at zaat meh nahin farmahi gaee, balkay Ulluhiyat kay mutaliq heh, Yehni logo tumara khuda ek khud heh, aur meh be tumari misl hoon, yehni keyun kay tumara khuda ek heh aur meh be sirf hoon bashariat meh tumari misl, toh mafoom yeh hoga kay logo mera khuda be ek khuda heh. Allah nay shoroon meh hokam deeya kay farma doh tum sirf bashariat meh un kee misl ho, aur phir agay bataya kay Bashariat meh un kee Misl kesay heh, yehni logo tumara khuda ek khuda heh."
Aur is kee tasdeeq, Pir karam shah Al Azhari nay apni Tafsir Zia Ul Quran meh farmahi:
"... Sir yaqinan ek baat meh mamasi'lat heh woh yeh heh: "innahu la ilaha illahu." wo be ek khuda'hay wahid la shareek ka banda heh jis kay tum banday ho is ka khaliq o malik heh joh tumara khaliq o malik heh."
* Panchwan point, Bashariat meh Misliyat ka zikr heh aur in'nama kalmah e hasr heh yehni Sirf, toh RAsoolAllah nay takhsees farma deeh kay sirf Bashariat meh tum jesa hoon, Nooraniat jis ka zikr Allah tallah nay ayaat: "qad ja aqum manillahi Nooruv wa Kitabum" mubeen meh farmaya heh, us meh misliyat nahin sirf Misliyat Bashariat meh heh.
* Chat'tah point, Tamassala, aur Misluqum, Misl say hen, aur Al Munjid Deobandiyoon kee dicionary meh Mislu ka urdu meh tarjamah yoon keeya: Shuba, Nazeer, Mushabat, aur me nay is ko apnay ilfaaz meh Misl e Bashar likha heh, yehni Bashri Mushabat, Bashri Nazeer, Bashri shabih. Note keren Mushabat e Bashriat say haqiqi Bashariat muraad nahin balkay Bashariat say joh mushabat heh woh muraad heh, heh logo meh sirf mushbat e bashariat meh tum jesa hoon, sirf dekhnay meh tum jesa hoon, zahir meh tum jesa hoon.Aur keyun kay Misl say Tamsil heh, is say muraad huwi kay Jibraeel alayhis salam Misl e Bashr hen, aur Haqiqi Bashr nahin hen. Aur is'see tera RasoolAllah kay leyeh be lafz Misluqum istimaal huwa heh aur RasoolAllah be Misl e bashr hen, haqiqat Bashriat nahin.
* Satwanh Point, Mushrikeen aur Kaffir RasoolAllah ko Bashr hee mantay thay, is'see leyeh RasoolAllah kee nabuwat kay munkir thay, woh bee yahee tana detay thay kay yeh toh ham jesa Bashr heh kesay nabi ho sakta heh. Jab Mushrikeen ka bee yahee aqeedah ho, kay RasoolAllah Bashr hen toh phir ilaan kerwanay kee zeroorat kia pesh aahi, RasoolAllah kee Nabuwat per un kee bashariat kee bina per ihtiraaz thah, toh kia ilaan e Bashariat say un kay ihtiraaz ka rad hota heh ya taheed, phir is ayaat kay nazal kernay ka maqsid bila waja heh, keyun kay Mushrik toh pehlay hee Bashr mantay thay, aur unee ko yeh kehna kay meh Bashr hoon, is baat kee tuq nahin banti. Yeh ilaan e Bashariat nahin thah, un jesi Bashariat ka ilaan nahin thah balkay Misl e Bashr honay ka ilaan thah kay meh sirf Misl e Bashr hoon, logo meri Bashariat ko dekh ker is ko meri haqiqat nah samjoh meh Misl e Bashr hoon, zahir meh Bashr hoon meri haqiqat yeh nahin, balkay haqiqat ka ilaan Allaht allah nay khud farmaya: Ya ahlal kitab ... Qad ja aqum manillahi Nooruv Wa Kitabum mubeen." {"tumaray pass Allah kee taraf say Noor aur Kitab e Mubeen ahi"}
Aur aakhir meh, ek mmuffasir ka ek mafoom biyaan krna aur baqiyoon ko nah biyaan kerna, aur sakoot ikhtiyaar kerna is baat kee daleel nahin kay us Muffasir nay us ko ghalat samja heh is leyeh biyaan nahin keeya. Aalim, Muhaddith ka sakoot us kay munkir honay kee daleel nahin hota, balkay us kee tardeed motbar hoti heh. Aur dosri baat yeh heh kay in Mufassireen kay dor meh aap jesay chavlen marnay walay nahin thay, aur nah kohi RasoolAllah kee Nooraniat kay munkir thay aur nah kissi nay RAsoolAllah kee BAshariat kee aarh meh Nooraniat ka inqaar keeya thah. Misluqum ko sirf Bashariat kee daleel nahin banaya thah isleyeh unoon nay is per kuch likha nahin, un kay dor meh chavlen marnay walay nahin thay, yeh chavlen marnay walay 17th century kay baad Ibnul Wahab Najdi kay manay walay peda huway. Is say pehlay Imam Busairi jesay Nooraniat kay qahil toh millen gay, sab man'nay walay toh millen gay magar munkir kohi nahin millay ga, siwahay Ibn Taymiyah kay, balkay us ka Shagird Ibn Kathir be Nooraniat e Muhammedi ka qahil aur man'nay wala thah, bura ho Wahabiyoon ka inoon nay Ibn Kathir kee tafsir meh editing ker deeh. Warma Zia Ul Quran kee translation meh us kee haqiqat majood heh. Joh Ihtiraaz jis zamanay meh huwa toh Ulamah e waqt nay uska rad keeya, jab yeh ihtiraaz utha hee nahin toh likhen kesay. Is leyeh Ulamah e Ahle Sunnat As Salaf Us Saliheen ko is ka pata thah woh samajtay thay mantay thay, magir keyun kay tumaray jesay Wahabi jahil aur be'imaan us waqt mojood nah thay jinoon nay ihtiraaz keeya Nooraniat per is ayaat kee aarh meh is leyeh is per kuch likha nah gaya. Abh keyun kay tumaray Wahabi mazhib meh chavlen marnay walay peda huway hen toh un ka rad Arabi zubaan say kerna zeroori heh, aur yeh logic nahin grammar heh.
Un ka RasoolAllah kee Fazilat e Bashariat ko nah dekhna nah samajna esa heh jesay anday koo sooraj nah nah dekhai dena. Abh andoon kee ghalti heh kay woh fazilat e RasoolAllah ko nah dekh sakkay, RasoolAllah kee fazilat ka nah hona sabit nahin hota. Aam insaan is leyeh samja kay woh Misl e Bashr thay, jistera Maryam Aalyhis salam kay pass Jibraeel alayhis salam punchay toh unoonnay bee aam Bashr hee samja aur parda ker leeya, aur Allah say pana mangi Bashr kay sharh say: "She said: "I seek refuge from thee to ((Allah)) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah." Unoon nay Jibraeel alayhis salam ko Bashr samja thah aur yahee soch ker pana mangi thee kay nuqsaan punchahay ga, agar pata hota kay Farishta heh toh phir dar kis baat ka farishta toh hilta bee nahin begher Allah kay hokam say. Aur Ibrahim alayhis salam kay pass jab Farishtay punchay toh unoon nay aam Bashr, mehmaan samaj ker buna huwa bachra khanay kay leyeh rakha, daleel heh kay jab Bashr ban ker Noor ata heh toh Bashr hee lagta heh dekhahi deta heh. Aur RasoolAllah ko kaffiroon nay Bashr hee samja keyun kay woh Bashr hee ban ker tashreef farma huwa thay. Un ka yeh sab kehna is leyeh thah kay Bashriat meh Nooraniat chupi thee. Jab unoon nay Bashr dekha toh Bashr hee samja jistera Maryam alayhis salam aur Ibrahim alayhis salam nay Farishtoon ko Bashr samja.
Jee RasoolAllah ko hokam huwa thah, kay ilaan ker doh kay: "Kehdo! sirf meh hoon Misl e Bashr tumari jesa." Abh woh nah samaj sakkay toh un kee khata, aur Allah tallah nay khud ilaan farmaya deeya, o Ahle kitaab, o peray likhay Yahoodiyo aur Isa'yo, tumaray pass Allah kee taraf say ek Noor aya heh aur Kitab e Mubeen: "Ya Ahlul Kitabi ... Qad ja'aqum manillahi Nooruv wa kitabum Mubeen." Nooraniat ka Ilaan Allah nay khud keeya aur farmaya Noor aya heh Allah kee taraf say, yeh nahin farmaya logo tum ko Bashr dekhahi deta heh toh Bashr ayah heh, joh haqiqat e RasoolAllah ko janta thah, us nay khud haqiqat ka ilaan keeya, kissi be jaga Allah tallah nay yeh nahin farmaya kay tum in jesay Bashr ho, Muhammed tum logoon jesa Bashr heh, O Muhammed tum in jesay Bashr ho, Allah nay yeh nahin farmaya, keyun kay dekhnay walay be dekh saktay thay kay Bashr hen, Allah nay khud Nooraniat e RAsoolAllah ka ilaan keeya, heh peray likhay logo, heh Ahle kitaab Allah kee taraf say tumaray pass ek Noor aya, aur Kitab e mubeen aahi. Allah nay RAsoolAllah kee us haqiqat ka zikr keeya joh sirf Allah janta thah aur RasoolAllah jantay thay, Allah nay us haqiqat ka zikr farmaya jis ka zikr RasoolAllah nay nahin farmaya. Pehlay sabit ker chuka hoon kay Sahabah, Muffasireen nay is ayaat ko tawazoh, inkasari, khaqsari, aajzi, humility kay maffoom meh samja: "Kehdo sirf meh hoon Misl e Bashr tumari jesa." Aur aajzi, inkasari, khaqsari, humility us waqt hoti heh jab khohi khud apnay martbay kee nafi keray, aap shaan ko kam biyan keray, professor apnay shagirdoon ko kahay kay meh apnay shagirdoon jesa hoon, toh muraad yeh nahin hogi kay woh apnay shagirdoon jesa heh ilm meh, nahin balkay yeh us kee aajzi heh. Aajzi, inkasar, aajzi us waqt hogi jab professor apnay aap kay mutaliq kehta heh aur khud kehta heh, agar shagird kahay kay professor ham jesa shagird heh toh gustakhi heh professor kee us nay professor kay ilm ko kam keeya shagird keh ker. Aur jab kohi bara, professor say bara PhD wala kahay kay yeh Professor hen toh yeh us kee haqiqat ka zikr heh, yehni profeesor kee haqiqat ka biyaan heh, Abh note keren, RasoolAllah nay apnay baray meh farmaya toh Allah nay aajzi kerwahi, Wahabi nay RasoolAllah ko apnay jesa kaha toh gustakhi kee, aur Allah nay RasoolAllah kee Noor honay ka, Noor behijnay ka zikr keeya toh un kee haqiqat huwi.
Bhai sahab aap lambi chauri bohot karte ho..mein ne aap se aik baat ye poochi thi ke ..jo aap ne Rasool Allah
ko ma fauqul bashar aur bohot hi special qisim ki personality bana diya hay..Allah ke barabar sifaat daydi unko...sawal ye hay kay itni qualities say is ummat ko kia faida hay..Jis maqsad se unko is dunya mein bheja tha Allah ne us kaam mein itni qualities ki kia zaroorat thi..kia kisi pure bashar se ye kaam nahi liya ja sakta tha????aur itni khaas qisim ki qualities rakhne ke bawajoob kufaar ko wo sab nahi dikhaya ja raha hay jiska shadeed taqaza ho raha hay..
وَقَالُواْ مَالِ هَـٰذَاٱلرَّسُولِ يَأْكُلُ ٱلطَّعَامَ وَيَمْشِي فِي ٱلأَسْوَاقِ لَوْلاۤ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْهِ مَلَكٌ فَيَكُونَ مَعَهُ نَذِيراًاًأَوْ يُلْقَىٰإِلَيْهِ كَنْزٌ أَوْ تَكُونُ لَهُ جَنَّةٌ يَأْكُلُ مِنْهَا وَقَالَ ٱلظَّالِمُونَ إِن تَتَّبِعُونَ إِلاَّ رَجُلاً مَّسْحُورo
aakhir kufaar ko wo cheezein kion na nazar aain..kion taqaze kar rahay thay ..wo aik SPECIALITY ka..kion unko wo sab dikha kar muh band nahi kar diya..aap ne iska jawab nahi diya..
{Jogi, Budhist sab kertay hen magir Bashriat meh kamzoori hoti heh jism kee hadiyan nazr aa jaati hen, magir RasoolAllah per rozay rakhnay kee waja per kohi farq nahin aya thah, kohi jismani kamzori zahir nahin ho rahi thee. RasoolAllah nay farmaya tha mera rab mujjay khilata pilata heh meray sahabah, sari Hadith ko pero.}
Jab khaiber ke moqe par zehrila khana khaya tha to kia unke jisim par farq na para ..kia wo bemaar na pare..kia unki wafaat usi zehreele ghost ki waja se na hoi..??? kia umer ke aakhir hissay mein unka jisim kamzor na para jo Abu Bakar
ko namaz parhani pari..kia wo apne jisim mubarak par pichne(JOONK) nahi lagwatay thay..ye sab kia hay..????
قَدْ جَاءكُمْ مِّنَ ٱللَّهِ نُورٌ } يعني ضياء من الضلالة وهو محمد - صلى الله عليه وسلم - والقرآن والنور هو الذي يبين الأشياء، ويرى الأبصار حقيقتها، فيسمى القرآن نوراً، لأنه يقع في القلوب مثل النور، لأنه إذا وقع في قلبه يبصر به، ثم قال: { وَكِتَـٰبٌ مُّبِينٌ } يعني القرآن يبين لكم الحق من الباطل. قوله تعالى: { يَهْدِي بِهِ ٱللَّهُ } يعني بالقرآن { مَنِ ٱتَّبَعَ رِضْوَانَهُ } يعني مَنْ طلب الحق ورغب فيه، { سُبُلَ ٱلسَّلَـٰمِ } يعني دين الله الإسلام، والسب
* تفسير بحر العلوم/ السمرقندي (ت 375 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
noor se is ayat mein kia muraad he mein aik bare mufassir ka hawala diya hay..unho ne noor se muraad wo (GUMRAHI MEIN ROSHNI BAN KAR AAEY .).
agar aap ke pass koi authentic daleel he ke is ayat mein noor se murad jismani noor he to please pesh karein..
{* Pehla point, Imam Raazi rahimullah alayhi tallah nay joh likha heh woh toh Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat ka aqeedah heh, kay logo meh Bashr hoon. RasoolAllah Bashr hen, aur jumla Tashbiya be heh, aur jumla Tasbhiyah meh qulli zaat o sifat ke tashbih nahin hoti sirf ek quality kee tashbih hoti heh aur ayaat: " sirf meh hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl." meh tashbih e Bashariat heh, yehni meh sirf Bashariat meh tumari jesa hoon, nabuwat, shahid, Noor, honay meh meri misl tum jesi nahin.}
وَقَالُوا لَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لَكَ حَتَّى تَفْجُرَ لَنَا مِنَ الأَرْضِ يَنْبُوعًا (الإسراء: 90). أَوْ تَكُونَ لَكَ جَنَّةٌ مِنْ نَخِيلٍ وَعِنَبٍ فَتُفَجِّرَ الأَنهَارَ خِلاَلَهَا تَفْجِيرًا (الإسراء: 91). أَوْ تُسْقِطَ السَّمَاءَ كَمَا زَعَمْتَ عَلَيْنَا كِسَفًا أَوْ تَأْتِيَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْمَلاَئِكَةِ قَبِيلاً (الإسراء: 92). أَوْ يَكُونَ لَكَ بَيْتٌ مِنْ زُخْرُفٍ أَوْ تَرْقَى فِي السَّمَاءِ وَلَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لِرُقِيِّكَ حَتَّى تُنَزِّلَ عَلَيْنَا كِتَابًا نَقْرَؤُهُ قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي هَلْ كُنتُ إِلاَّ بَشَرًا رَسُولاً (الإسراء: 93)
وقوله: { قُلْ سُبْحانَ رَبّـي } يقول تعالـى ذكره لنبـيه مـحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم: قل يا مـحمد لهؤلاء الـمشركين من قومك، القائلـين لك هذه الأقوال، تنزيها لله عما يصفونه به، وتعظيـما له من أن يؤتـى به وملائكته، أو يكون لـي سبـيـل إلـى شيء مـما تسألونـيه: { هَلْ كُنْتُ إلاَّ بَشَرا رَسُولاً } يقول: هل أنا إلاَّ عبد من عبـيده من بنـي آدم، فكيف أقدر أن أفعل ما سألتـمونـي من هذه الأمور، وإنـما يقدر علـيها خالقـي وخالقكم، وإنـما أنا رسول أبلغكم ما أرسلت به إلـيكم، والذي سألتـمونـي أن أفعله بـيد الله الذي أنا وأنتـم عبـيد له، لا يقدر علـى ذلك غيره.
تفسير جامع البيان في تفسير القرآن/ الطبري (ت 310 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
(Kia mein bani adam ke aur bando ki tarah banda nahi hoon,mein kaysay ye kaam kar sakta hoon jo tum karne ke liye keh rahay ho,is kaam par to mera aur tumhara khaliq hi qadir hay, mein to sirf aik Rasool hoon mein to jo kuch bhi mujh par nazil hota hay wo tum tak pohoncha deta hoon,aur jo karne ko keh rahay ho wo Allah ke haath mein hay,mein aur tum to uskay banday hein aur hum is kaam par qudrat nahi rakhtay) IMAM TIBRI
chalo hum to hein hi gustaakh, badmazhab, badaqeeda aur na jane kia kia ....Tumlog Imam Tibri sahab ko to maante hona..Ya ye bhi badmazhab hein..Inho ne to aap ke batil aqeedon ki nafi kardi hay..Jo kuch bhi aap log Rasool Allah ke ikhtiyaraat aur qudrat ke baray mein bayan karte ho aur unko noori aur powerful shakhssiyat kehtay ho..is tafseer mein to zabardast tareke say iski nafi ki gai hay..
قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي } يعني النبيّ صلى الله عليه وسلم؛ أي قال ذلك تنزيهاً لله عز وجل عن أن يعجز عن شيء وعن أن يعترض عليه في فعل. وقيل: هذا كله تعجب عن فرط كفرهم واقتراحاتهم. الباقون «قل» على أمر؛ أي قل لهم يا محمد { هَلْ كُنتُ } أي ما أنا «إلاّ بشراً رسولاً» أتبع ما يوحى إليّ من ربّي، ويفعل الله ما يشاء من هذه الأشياء التي ليست في قدرة البشر، فهلسمعتم أحداً من البشر أتى بهذه الآيات!
تفسير الجامع لاحكام القرآن/ القرطبي (ت 671 هـ) مصنف و مدق
Imam Qurtubi bhi wohi baat kar rahay hein ke " Rasool ne kaha mein kia hoon..Mein to sirf usi cheez ki ittibah karta hoon jo mujhe wahi ki jati hay, aur jo cheez tum maang rahay ho wo Allah hi kar saktay hein,Aik BASHAR ki qudrat nahi ke wo ye kaam kar sakay jo tum keh rahay ho,is se pehlay kabhi tum ne suna hay ke kisi BASHAR ne is tarah ka kaam kia ho.. IMAM QURTUBI
Bilkul clear kaha ja raha hay ke Rasool aam bashar ki tarah aik bashar thay..
Muhammed tum logoon jesa Bashr heh, O Muhammed tum in jesay Bashr ho, (is ibarat ko arbi mein likhein kaysay likha jaega ye???
{Pehlay sabit ker chuka hoon kay Sahabah, Muffasireen nay is ayaat ko tawazoh, inkasari, khaqsari, aajzi, humility kay maffoom meh samja: "Kehdo sirf meh hoon Misl e Bashr tumari jesa." Aur aajzi, inkasari, khaqsari, humility us waqt hoti heh jab khohi khud apnay martbay kee}
tawazu inkasari qualities mein hoti hein,structure mein nahi hoti, kon say mufassir aur sahabi ne isko tawaza o inkasari kaha hay..
{ قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مّثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰ إِلَىَّ } أي لا امتياز بيني وبينكم في شيء من الصفات إلا أن الله تعالى أوحى إلي أنه لا إله إلا الله الواحد الأحد الصمد،
* تفسير مفاتيح الغيب ، التفسير الكبير/ الرازي (ت 606 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
yahan clear kaha ja raha hay ke mujh mein aur tum mein koi imtiaz nahi hay sirf ye ke mein peghambar hoon mujh par wahi aati hay..kon si aajzi baat aap kar rahay ho..lagta hay saray mufassiron ko aap jaisi garmmer nahi aati thi..
kuch cheezein rah gai hein unka jawab baad mein doonga..office mein hoon..
-
Janab first of all aap say guzarish hay keh reply main pora pehlay wala topic quote na kia karain.Meharbani
Janab Ya Allah Madad Sb.Kya Quran ko aap nain Sahi samja ya Sahaba Radi Allah o Unhum Ajmaeen nain????
Main nain itni Ahadees Shaif paish keen jis main Sahaba Aap
ko NOOR keh kar pukar rahay hain,Kya aap is ka inkar kartay ho????
Aur janab aap nain shayad Imam Razi ke tafsser full nahi pary keh kyon Huzoor
nain farmaya tha keh main b tumhari tarah bashar hon.Aap
nain sif aajazi k lia farmaya tha.
Janab e Aali kya aap Huzoor
k Noor ka mutlaqan inkaar kartay ho???Agar aisa hay tu phir tum Sahaba k aqeeday ka b inkar kartay ho.
Baqi aap Muhammad Ali Bhai k saath continue rakhain.
وَقَالُوا لَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لَكَ حَتَّى تَفْجُرَ لَنَا مِنَ الأَرْضِ يَنْبُوعًا (الإسراء: 90). أَوْ تَكُونَ لَكَ جَنَّةٌ مِنْ نَخِيلٍ وَعِنَبٍ فَتُفَجِّرَ الأَنهَارَ خِلاَلَهَا تَفْجِيرًا (الإسراء: 91). أَوْ تُسْقِطَ السَّمَاءَ كَمَا زَعَمْتَ عَلَيْنَا كِسَفًا أَوْ تَأْتِيَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْمَلاَئِكَةِ قَبِيلاً (الإسراء: 92). أَوْ يَكُونَ لَكَ بَيْتٌ مِنْ زُخْرُفٍ أَوْ تَرْقَى فِي السَّمَاءِ وَلَنْ نُؤْمِنَ لِرُقِيِّكَ حَتَّى تُنَزِّلَ عَلَيْنَا كِتَابًا نَقْرَؤُهُ قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي هَلْ كُنتُ إِلاَّ بَشَرًا رَسُولاً (الإسراء: 93)
وقوله: { قُلْ سُبْحانَ رَبّـي } يقول تعالـى ذكره لنبـيه مـحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم: قل يا مـحمد لهؤلاء الـمشركين من قومك، القائلـين لك هذه الأقوال، تنزيها لله عما يصفونه به، وتعظيـما له من أن يؤتـى به وملائكته، أو يكون لـي سبـيـل إلـى شيء مـما تسألونـيه: { هَلْ كُنْتُ إلاَّ بَشَرا رَسُولاً } يقول: هل أنا إلاَّ عبد من عبـيده من بنـي آدم، فكيف أقدر أن أفعل ما سألتـمونـي من هذه الأمور، وإنـما يقدر علـيها خالقـي وخالقكم، وإنـما أنا رسول أبلغكم ما أرسلت به إلـيكم، والذي سألتـمونـي أن أفعله بـيد الله الذي أنا وأنتـم عبـيد له، لا يقدر علـى ذلك غيره.
تفسير جامع البيان في تفسير القرآن/ الطبري (ت 310 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
(Kia mein bani adam ke aur bando ki tarah banda nahi hoon,mein kaysay ye kaam kar sakta hoon jo tum karne ke liye keh rahay ho,is kaam par to mera aur tumhara khaliq hi qadir hay, mein to sirf aik Rasool hoon mein to jo kuch bhi mujh par nazil hota hay wo tum tak pohoncha deta hoon,aur jo karne ko keh rahay ho wo Allah ke haath mein hay,mein aur tum to uskay banday hein aur hum is kaam par qudrat nahi rakhtay) IMAM TIBRI
chalo hum to hein hi gustaakh, badmazhab, badaqeeda aur na jane kia kia ....Tumlog Imam Tibri sahab ko to naamte hona..Ya ye bhi badmazhab hein..Inho ne to aap ke batil aqeedon ki nafi kardi hay..Jo kuch bhi aap log Rasool Allah
ke ikhtiyaraat aur qudrat ke baray mein bayan karte ho aur unko noori aur powerful shakhssiyat kehtay ho..is tafseer mein to zabardast tareke say iski nafi ki gai hay..
قُلْ سُبْحَانَ رَبِّي } يعني النبيّ صلى الله عليه وسلم؛ أي قال ذلك تنزيهاً لله عز وجل عن أن يعجز عن شيء وعن أن يعترض عليه في فعل. وقيل: هذا كله تعجب عن فرط كفرهم واقتراحاتهم. الباقون «قل» على أمر؛ أي قل لهم يا محمد { هَلْ كُنتُ } أي ما أنا «إلاّ بشراً رسولاً» أتبع ما يوحى إليّ من ربّي، ويفعل الله ما يشاء من هذه الأشياء التي ليست في قدرة البشر، فهلسمعتم أحداً من البشر أتى بهذه الآيات!
تفسير الجامع لاحكام القرآن/ القرطبي (ت 671 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
Imam Qurtubi bhi wohi baat kar rahay hein ke " Rasool
ne kaha mein kia hoon..Mein to sirf usi cheez ki ittibah karta hoon jo mujhe wahi ki jati hay, aur jo cheez tum maang rahay ho wo Allah hi kar saktay hein,Aik BASHAR ki qudrat nahi ke wo ye kaam kar sakay jo tum keh rahay ho,is se pehlay kabhi tum ne suna hay ke kisi BASHAR ne is tarah ka kaam kia ho.. IMAM QURTUBI
Bilkul clear kaha ja raha hay ke Rasool
aam bashar ki tarah aik bashar thay..ab tum log mano ya na mano..ya phir in mufassiron ko jhutla do..Ab in mufassiron par fatwa lagado..Kafir..badmazhab..gustaakh..wahabi..deobandi..pata nahi kia kia..
-
Jee joh aap nay Tafsair pesh kee hen un ko khadim qabool kerta heh keyun kay RasoolAllah nay famraya heh kay Quran ka mafoom bera waseeh heh srif likha mukhtssar gaya heh. Aur meh nay is kee daleel peshlay pesh ker dee thee phir reapeat kernay kee zeroorat nahn. Ham sunni har tafsir ko mantay hen joh Sunni Aalim kee ho, aur joh Quran o Sunnat kay mutabiq ho. Quran kee shaan yeh heh kay us meh bot wasehh mafoom heh is leyen meh kesay limit laga sakta hoon Quran kay mafoom meh.
Kia tum munkir ho is point kay tamassala aur Misluqum donoon Misl say hen? Jab tum inqaar nahin ker saktay aur apni dajjaliat per perda nahin daal saktay toh phir mafoom meh farq kistera hoga. Root word Misl ka mafoom har us lafz meh hoga jis meh yeh istimaal ho, root word lafz bunyadi lafz hota heh jis kee bunyaad per aur lafz bantay hen, magir har lafz meh root word ka mafoom paya jata heh. Jistera English zubaan meh lafz Confess heh, yehni iqrar, abh yeh lafz confessed, confessing, confession, meh toh badal gaya magar bunyadi mafoom , iqrar keeya, iqrar ker, iqrar e jurm, gunnah weghera ... toh ilfaaz kee pronounciation badali, mafoom badla magir bunyadi lafz root word ka mafoom saath raha. Is'see tera Arabi meh root words ka mafoom ilfaaz kay saath rehta heh, Mislu, Misli, Masaluqum, Amsaluqum, Misluna, Misluhu, Misluha jistera be word badlay ...
Is leyeh Jibraeel alayhis slaam kay leyeh lafz tmassala bola gaya, aur RasoolAllah kay leyeh Misluqum. Magir mafoom donoon ka wohi raha sirf context kay mutabiq ilfaaz badlay. Jibraeel alayhis salam aur RasoolAllah Misl e Bashr hen Haqiqi Bashr nahin, keyun kay RasoolAllah be Noor sabit hen aur Jibraeel alayhis salam be Noor sabit hen.
Misl say kohi be lafz nikla ho zaat e haqiqi per nahin bola jata, balkay kissi ek quality per bola jata he:
* Surah 6 Verse38: "There is not an animal (that lives) on the earth, nor a being that flies on its wings, but (forms part of) communities LIKE YOU {amsaluqum}."
Abh kai is kamatlab yeh toh naihn nah kay Ants, Chimtiyan, insaan ban ker communities meh rehti hen. Is ka matlab yeh heh kay woh communities meh rehti hen jistera insaan communities meh rehti hen, magir aap kee mantaq kay mutabiq mafoom yeh hoga kay Ants insaan ban ker communities meh rehti heh keyun kay lafz Masaluqum istimaal huwa heh.
Jab jumla ibarat tashbiyah ho toh phir ek kissi sift say tashbih hoti heh qulli tor per tashbih nahin hoti, Jistera Ali Sher ka beta heh, toh is ka matlab yeh nahin kay Ali ka baap haqiqi mafoom meh dumb wala sher thah. Upper wali ayaat meh be Tashbih heh aur sirf ek quality say tashbih hoti heh qulli tor per nahin hoti. Aur joh neechay ayaat pesh hogi woh be jumla e tashbiyah heh aur us meh be ek kee quality say Tashbih heh qully tashbih nahin ho sakti.
Is'see tera RasoolAllah ko hokam huwa kay farma denh kay:
* Surah Al Kahf {18} Verse 110: "Kehdo! Sirf meh hoon Bashr tumari Misl. Mujjay Wahi behji gahee heh kay tumara khuda ek Khuda heh."
Toh matlab yeh nahin hoga kay RasoolAllah ham jesay Bashr hen, balkay Misli'at zaat meh nahin farmahi gaee, balkay Ulluhiyat kay mutaliq heh, Yehni logo tumara khuda ek khud heh, aur meh be tumari misl hoon, yehni keyun kay tumara khuda ek heh aur meh be sirf hoon bashariat meh tumari misl, toh mafoom yeh hoga kay logo mera khuda be ek khuda heh. Allah nay shoroon meh hokam deeya kay farma doh tum sirf bashariat meh un kee misl ho, aur phir agay bataya kay Bashariat meh un kee Misl kesay heh, yehni logo tumara khuda ek khuda heh.
RasoolAllah kee Bashariat kee Tashbih insaniat say nahin balkay yeh Tashbih is mafoom meh heh kay logo jistera tumara khuda ek heh aur mera be ek heh. RasoolAllah kee Bashariat ham jesi nahin, agar ham jesi hoti toh RasoolAllah yeh nah Sahih bukhari kee hadith meh farmatay: "ayu'qum misli" {I am not like you}, agar hamari Bashariat hoti toh phir woh qabaroon meh namaz pernay waloon ko nah dekhntay, dozikhiyoon ko nah dekhtay, jannatiyoon ko jannat meh nah dekhtay azaab e qabr kee awazan nah suntay,jism mubarak kay paseenay say booh aati khushbooh nah aati,dant mubarak say Noor nah nikalta, ungliyoon say paani ka chashma nah jaari hota ... bas Bashr thay, magar afzalul Bashr, thay Adam alayhis salm jesay bashr thay, Musa alayhis salam jesay bashr thay, un kee bashariat ham jeesi nahin.
Jibraeel alayhis Salam Misl e Bashr ban ker tashreef lahay aur RAsoolAllah ka be Misl e Bashr hona sabit heh. Baqi aap chavlen maren aap ko chavlen marna zeb deta heh, mujjay toh chavlen marnay kee fursat nahin.
Shukar hay tum ne tameez se baat to ki ..
Tum ajeeb aadmi ho aik taraf to iqraar kar rahay ho ke ye tafaseer sahi hein..to mere bhai..Imam Razi saaf tor se keh rahay hein ke ...aaey logon mujh mein aur tum mein koi IMTIAZ nahi hay bashriat ki sifaat mein..sirf ye fazilat hay mujh ko tum par ke mein Allah ka peghamber hoon mujh par wahi aati hay..to kia aap ki logic inko kion na samjh mein i..
yahi baat baqi dono mufassiron ne kahi hay..jab wo Nabi
jismani bashar maan rahay hein to aap kion logic pesh kar rahay ho..unko ye logic ziyada pata honi cha hiye thi na..
Aur sab se bari baat to ye hay ke jo sifaat aap log Rasool
mein sabit karna chah rahay ho..hum aur tum to sirf unko parhatay hein..kufaar to barah e raast mushhida kar rhay thay..to wo kion kehtay thay Nabi
ko ke tum aik aam insaan ho..hum tum par emaan nahi laingay..aur tumharay sath to khazanay hone chahiye ..aur hum apne par tumhari koi fazilat bhi nahi dekhte..
وَقَالُواْ مَالِ هَـٰذَاٱلرَّسُولِ يَأْكُلُ ٱلطَّعَامَ وَيَمْشِي فِي ٱلأَسْوَاقِ لَوْلاۤ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْهِ مَلَكٌ فَيَكُونَ مَعَهُ نَذِيراًo
اًأَوْ يُلْقَىٰإِلَيْهِ كَنْزٌ أَوْ تَكُونُ لَهُ جَنَّةٌ يَأْكُلُ مِنْهَا وَقَالَ ٱلظَّالِمُونَ إِن تَتَّبِعُونَ إِلاَّ رَجُلاً مَّسْحُور
Jo mafoqul bashri Rasool Allah
ki aap biyaan karte ho..in kuffar ko jo barah e raast unka mushahida kar rahay thay..unko kion na nazar i ye baat.
Aur sab se barh kar khud Rasool
jo inki hidayat ke liye puri puri raat rote thay ..kion in kuffaar se na kaha aao dekho mere khazane..dekho mera saya nahi hay..dekho mere jisim se kaysa noor nikalta hay..aao mein tumko wo sab kuch dikhata hoon jo tum aik special insaan mein dekhna chahatay ho..mein sarapa noor hoon..kion aesa hoa ke Rasool Allah
ki wo qualities jo aap log bayan karte ho ..kion Rasool Allah
ne un kuffaar ko dikha kar unka muh kion band nahi kar diya..
aur rahi baat bukhari ki hadees (ke kon meri misil hay) isko aap samjh lo..Rasool Allah
ne jo sahaba ko kaha ke kon meri tarah hay..unka maqsad unko itne mujahide se rokna tha..ke tum mein itni taaqat nahi hay..iski misaal yun samjho..Aik bohot taqatwar aadmi bohot bhari wazan uthata hay aur us mein us wazan uthane ki salahiyat hay is liye wo utha raha hay..magar agar wohi wazan koi kamzor aam sa banda uthaega to uski kamar zaroor jaegi..to taqatwar aadmi bolega ..bhai to mujh jaysa nahi hay..to na utha ye wazan..iska ye matlab nahi hay kay wo kamzor aadmi kuch aur hi zaat ka hay aur taqatwar aadmi kuch aur hi zaat ka hay..
Dunya mein bohot saray mazahib ke log hein..unke mazhab mein bare bare ajeeb mujahide hein..koi un mujahidon ke karne ka soch hi nahi sakta..BUDHIST..HINDU JOGI..SAADHU AUR PATA NAHI KAYSAY KAYSAY LOG HEIN JO MA FAUQ UL BASHRI MUJAHIDE KARTE HEIN JINKO KOI NAHI KAR SAKTA..ISKA YE MATLAB NAHI HAY KE WO INSAAN NAHI HEIN KOI NOORI MAKHLOOQ HEIN..
BILKUL YAHI TASHREE BUKHARI KI HADEES KI HAY..(AYYUKUM MISLI)
AUR JANNAT AUR DOOZAKH DEKHNA ANBIYA KA MUJZA HOTA HAY YAHI CHEEZ UNKO AAM AADMI SE MUMTAZ KARTI HAY..
-
Tum nay yeh ihtiraaz is ayaat per keyun nah keeya: "... then We sent her our angel, and he appeared before her as a man in all respects." {Surah Maryam {19} Verse 17}Yahan per toh tum nay yeh likha tha: "... farishtay jab bhi is dunya mein aain hein bashar ban kar ..unho ne sirf bashar ki shabih ikhtiar ki hoi hoti hay magar wo apni asliat ke lihaz say farishaty hi hotay hein." Yahan per tooh nay yeh keyun nah kaha: "yahi baat isi tarah se Allah ne kion na kehdi ..." Sirf is leyeh nah kee keyun kay tooh nay RasoolAllah kee Nooraniat ka rad kerna thah halan kay tooh nay Mas'sala ka mana yeh keeya heh: "farishtay jab bhi is dunya mein aain hein bashar ban kar ..unho ne sirf bashar ki shabih ikhtiar ki hoi hoti hay magar wo apni asliat ke lihaz say farishaty hi hotay hein." Abh point yeh heh kay jab woh Shabih ikhtiyaar keren, Soorat e Bashriat ikhtiyar keren, Lebas e Bashriat apnahen, toh phir ZAHIR meh BASHR hee dekhahi denh gay dekhnay meh, zahir meh Bashr hee lagen gay, Farishtay nahin. Is'see leyeh meray Imam nay is ayaat ka tarjumah yoon keeya: "To un say udhar ek perda ker leeya, toh us kee taraf ham nay apna roohani behja woh us kay samnay ek tandarust aadmi kay roop meh zahir huwa." Sayyidi Ala Hazrat nay tumaray point ko mukhtasar ker kay tarjumeh meh biyaan ker deeya.
Surah Maryam ayaat 17 meh lafz Mas'sala istimal huwa heh jis kay root letters MSL hen, aur Sura Al Kahf ayaat 110 Misluqum istimal huwa heh jis kay root letters MSL hen. Mafoom meh yeh haqiqat kay leyeh nahin bola jata balkay, Zahir per bola jata heh, joh dekhahi deh ... Is kay baad meh nay wazahat kee thee, kay Mas'sala ka mafoom yeh heh kay Jibraeel zahiri tor per Bashr thay, dekhnay meh Bashr thay ... aur Misluqum keyun kay same root letters say heh is leyeh mafoom be wohi heh joh Mas'sala ka heh yehni Zahir meh tumaray jesa Bashr hoon, dekhnay meh tumaray jesa Bashr hoon.
Yeh mantaq nahin, philosophy nahin meray chunnay munnay nunnay bachay, yeh Arabic grammar heh jis kee tummeh alif bee nahin aati.
Yeh Allah tallah nay Ummat ko laranay kay leyeh nahin balkay Allah tallah nay Arabi zubaan meh yeh Quran utara heh, aur Arabi ka exact tarjuma kerna asaan nahin, agir tarjumah keren toh ilfaaz mafoom kho beth'tay hen, is leyeh Tafsiri-tarjumah keeya jata heh takay Quran kee ayaat ka asal mafoom translation meh loose nah ho. Lafz Mas'sala aur Misluqum donoon kay root letters MSL hen aur mafoom ek hee heh. Abh agir Ummati khud Quran ko nah maneh, aur laren, aur Quran kay feslay ko qabool nah keren toh is meh Allah kee kia khata heh, Allah kee kia ghalti heh, bajahay yeh kehnay kay meh apni ghalti tasleem kernay kay bajahay Allah say lar raha hoon, us kay Quran say lar raha hoon, ulta Allah ko ilzaam deh rahay ho kay Allah Ummat ko lara raha heh.
Misluqum aur Mas'sala ka mafoom ek heh root letters ek hen jab Mas'sala ka mafoom yeh heh kay Jibraeel alayhis salam zahiri soorat meh, dekhnay meh, lebaas e Bashriat meh ahay, soorat e Bashr meh ahay, Shabih a Bashr meh ahay toh phir RasoolAllah kee Misluqum Bashari'at ko tum literal Bashariat ka mafoom deh ker, Allah kay khilaaf, Quran kay khilaaf, jang kero aur ilzaam doh kay Allah ummat ko lara raha heh. Wah reh Wahabiyat teray kuffr kee had'h nahin.
Mas'sala ka lafz Jibareel alayhis slam kay leyeh istimaal ho toh Lebaas e Bashriat, Soorat e Bashariat, Shabih e Bashriat ka mafoom doh aur wohi lafz RasoolAllah kay leyeh istimaal ho toh tum RasoolAllah kee Bashariat ka Soorat e Bashariat, Shabih e Bashariat, lebass e Basharian, man'nay say inqaar ker doh. Yeh tumari be'imani heh, warna imaan wala Quran wala, musalmaan kabi bee inqaar nah keray. Tum aur muj meh yahee farq heh, tum nay Allah kay khilaaf jang jari rakhi, aur meh jab Wahabi thah toh jab ek point sabit ho jata toh tasleem ker leta, nateeja yeh huwa kay meh Sunni huwa aur tum kaffiroon kay group meh ho jis kay mutaliq Rasoolallah nayf armaya thah kay intihahi bewaqoof, jahil hoon gay, aur East yehni Najd say niklen gay.
Tum jahil ho, is leyeh aqal nahin warna ithiraaz nah kertay, kuch esay jumlay hotay hen jin ka literal tarjumah kerna muhaal hota heh, misaal kay tor per: "Mera sar chakkar kha raha heh" Abh teray jesa kutta damagh Wahabi is ka kia tarjumah keray ga English meh, yahi nah kay: "I am feeling dizzy" Ya phir kutta damagh insaan yeh tarjumah keray ga: "My head is eating circles." Ya yeh lenh is ka English meh tarjumah keren aur mujjay batahen kay kesay tarjumah keren gay: "Meh nay apnay dil per pathar rakh ker chup saad li." English meh yeh tarjuma theek heh: "I placed a stone on my heart, and maintained silence." abh tarjumah toh ho gaya, magir placing stone on heart ka matlab kia heh: "I suppressed my feelings and maintained silence."
Tarjumah kerna abbah jee kee khodh meh khelna nahin heh kay ankh band ker kay tarjumah ker lenh gay, Arabi jumlay bilkhasoos Quran kee Arabi ka tarjumah literal kerna bot mushkil kaam heh, aur jahan per tarjumah mushkil hota heh wahan per Tafsiri tarjumah keeya jata heh taqay mafoom sahih tera jana ja sakkay: Abh literal tarjumah my head is eating circles to ker deeya magir kon sa English daan is ko samjay ga kay is ka matlab kia heh. Is leyeh meray bachay, Chavlen marna chor doh, tum ko yeh jahalat stupidity abbah jee say genetically aur ilmi tor per warsay meh milli heh, is leyeh mujjay pata heh kay joh kutta damagh logh hotay hen woh kutta damagh soch hee rakhtay hen aur zubaan ziyada chalatay hen aur damagh ko istimaal kerna bilqul nahin ata un ko.
Allah farmate hein ke ye quran seedhi baat karta hay..to khud faisla karo..Allah ne to ye seedhi baat na ki..parho kuch matlab kuch..
Jee kafi derh baad kohi kaam kee baat likhi heh abh meh toh tap gaya thah, agir pass hotay toh tummeh thappar mar mar kay tumaray damagh ko meh qaan kay zareyeh bahir nikalta itni tap chari thee tumari jahalat aur stupidity ko perh kay. Quran ka har lafz finely tuned heh, Quran kay ilfaaz kee misaal is leyeh deeh kay kuch kutta damagh logh samaj lenh, jin logoon kay khalq say Quran neechay nahin utarnay wala jesa kay rasoolAllah nay Wahabia kay mutaliq farmaya thah Sahih Marfooh hadith meh ... toh Quran ko samjana kia ... aqli tor say samja raha hoon is leyeh kay RasoolAllah nay farmaya thah kay Quran khalq say neechay nahin utray ga, meh aqli tor per samja raha hoonkay shahid aqli misalen tumaray damagh meh gussen, magir meri khata keyun kay RasoolAllah nay farmaya thah kay Wahabiyah intihahi bewaqoof hoon gay ... is leyeh aqli misalen be kissi kam kee nahin hen aap kay leyeh.
Wahabi sirf teri zid heh warna abh toh dankay kee chot tooh jhoota kazzab aur batal sabit ho chuka heh magar phir be manay ga nahin.
Muhammed Ali Razvi
Tumhari itni fazool batein parh li ..is baat par bhi apni mantaq pesh karo..ke Hazrat Ibn Abbas
ne kion Jirael
ko bashar nahi balkay ..SHABIH kaha..
Aur tum ne aik bhi daleel aesi nahi pesh ki ke farishtay ne libas e basharyat mein koi bashar wala kaam kia ho..jokay bashri taqzay hote hein..kionke zaat badalti hay to fitrat bhi badal jati hay..aur aik tafseer pesh kar raha hoon..ab mujhe ye nahi pata ke Imam Razi ko ROOT WORD ka pata tha ya nahi.
قُلْ إِنَّمَآ أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مِّثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ أَنَّمَآ إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ فَمَن كَانَ يَرْجُواْ لِقَآءَ رَبِّهِ فَلْيَعْمَلْ عَمَلاً صَالِحاً وَلاَ يُشْرِكْ بِعِبَادَةِ رَبِّهِ أَحَدَاً }
أي لا امتياز بيني وبينكم في شيء من الصفات إلا أن الله تعالى أوحى إلي أنه لا إله إلا الله الواحد الأحد الصمد، والآية تدل على مطلوبين: الأول: أن كلمة { إِنَّمَا } تفيد الحصر وهي قوله: { أَنَّمَا إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وٰحِدٌ }. والثاني: أن كون الإله تعالى:
*تفسير مفاتيح الغيب ، التفسير الكبير/ الرازي (ت 606 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
aik aur tafseer mulahiza ho
{ قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مّثْلُكُمْ } أي: إن حالي مقصور على البشرية لا يتخطاها إلى الملكية، ومن كان هكذا فهو لا يدّعي الإحاطة بكلمات ال له إلا أنه امتاز عنهم بالوحي إليه من الله سبحانه فقال: { يُوحَىٰ إِلَىَّ } وكفى بهذا الوصف فارقاً بينه وبين سائر أنواع البشر، ثم بيّن أن الذي أوحى إليه هو قوله: { أَنَّمَا إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وٰحِدٌ } لا شريك له في ألوهيته، وفي هذا إرشاد إلى التوحيد، ثم أمرهم بالعمل الصالح والتوحيد فقال:
* تفسير فتح القدير/ الشوكاني (ت 1250 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَاْ بَشَرٌ مّثْلُكُمْ } لا أدعي الإِحاطة على كلماته. { يُوحَىٰ إِلَىَّ أَنَّمَا إِلَـٰهُكُمْ إِلَـٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ } وإنما تميزت عنكم بذلك. { فَمَن كَانَ يَرْجُو لِقَاء رَبّهِ } يؤمل حسن لقائه أو يخاف سوء لقائه. { فَلْيَعْمَلْ عَمَلاً صَـٰلِحاً } يرتضيه الله. { وَلاَ يُشْرِكْ بِعِبَادَةِ رَبّهِ أَحَدَا } بأن يرائيه أو يطلب منه أجراً
* تفسير انوار التنزيل واسرار التأويل/ البيضاوي (ت 791 هـ) مصنف و مدقق.
ye tafaseer aaplogonki ke har dil aziz hay jinpar par aap log dil o jaan nichawar karte hein..wo khud kia keh rahay hein..mulahiza karlo..SHAED IMAM RAZI AUR DOOSRE MUFFASIR TUM SAY ZIYADA ARBI GRAMMER JAANTE HEIN..YA TO INKO ROOT WORD AATA HI NAHI..
IN TAMAAM MUFASSIR NE AIK HI BAAT KAHI HAY KE RASOOL
MEIN AUR DOOSRE INSANO MEIN SIFAAT E BASHRI KE LIHAZ SE KOI FARQ NAHI..FAZILAT SIRF YE HAY KE WO PEGHAMBER HEIN UNPAR WAHI AATI HAY..
detail mein jawab mein fursat mein doonga kionke office mein beth kar sari debate karta hoon..
rahi baat KUTTO ki ye mat bolo mujhe please, mujh par case ho jaega.. kionke KUTTON wali sifaat ke saray copy rights aap ki dawat e islami ke pass hein..
baqi jawab fursat mein abhi kuch masroofiat hay..
-
Muhammed Ali Razvi nay Deobandi'at, Wahabi'at ko laateh keyun mari, yeh story 13 saal lambi heh. Joh meh baat likhoon Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat ka aqeedah nah ho, aur Jayyid Ulamah e Kiraam kee kitabooh say sabit nah ho yeh jitnay be Sunni bethay hen chup nah bethen fori tor per point out ker denh kay yeh Aqeedah Sunniyoon wala nahin. Joh bateh likhi joh dalahil likhay woh apnay uqabir Ulamah kay batahay huway aqahid kay mutabiq deeyeh, meh apni taraf say garh nahin raha.
Aap nay sachi baat ker kay khud'kashi kee
Agar aap kay dalahil meh pesh kerta toh aap kabi be tasleem nah kertay kohi nah kohi chavl martay, magar abh khud sar pansa leeya heh toh pansi meh deh deta hoon.
Jee mujjay ittifaq heh kay Farishtay Shabih e Bashariat meh atay hen, yehni Lebaas e Bashariat, Soorat e Bashr, Libada e Bashariat, mafoom wohi heh sirf ilfaaz mukhtalaf hen magir un kee Haqiqat Malaiki hoti heh. Aap nay daleel pesh kee kay "fata'mas'salaha" meh Farishtay kee soorat thee Bashariat kee, Haqiqat e Nooraniat yehni haqiqi zaat {Farishta} mojood thee. Is aap kay sach per mujjay bilqul kohi ihtiraaz nahin, balkay Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat ka aqeedah hee yahee heh.
Ilfaaz "fata'Massala'ha" kay root alphabets Meem, Say, Lam hen jin say word Misl banta heh, in root letters say joh be lafz banay ga us meh yeh bunyaadi mafoom hoga: zahir kay leyeh istimal huwa, aur haqiqat ka zikr nahin hota. Yehni : "Ali sher kee misl {like/jesa} heh" Is meh lafz Misl haqiqat per nahin bola gaya, yehni is ka matlab yeh nahin kay Ali kee ek dumb heh, aur shakal sher jesi heh weghera ...
Allah tallah nay Jibrael alayhis Salam kay Bashr kee soorat, meh janay ko Mas'sala, kay saath farmaya yehni woh sirf zahir meh Bashr jesa thah, sirf dekhnay meh Bashr thah ... aur Bashariat Jibareel alayhis salam kee Haqiqat nahin thee, joh mutafiq alay heh, Ahlus Sunnat Wal Jammah aur Ahlul Khawarij Wal Irtaad meh.
Abh dekhtay hen RAsoolAllah kee Bashari'at kee haqiqat kia heh, aap kay biyaan kerda sahih mafoom kay mutabiq:
* Surah Al Kahf {18} Verse 110: "Qull in'nama ana Basharum Misluqum yuha ..."
* Surah Al Fussilat {41} Verse 6: "Qull in'nama ana Basharum Misluqum yuha ..."
In donoon ayaat meh RasoolAllah ko hokam huwa heh kay apni Bashariat ka ilaan keren kin ilfaaz meh ilaan kerwaya pesh e khidmat heh: "Kehdo, Sirf meh hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl ..." Abh ghor keren lafz Misluqum per, is kay root letters Meem, Say, aur Laam hen aur aur root letters ka mafoom har us lafz meh hoga joh in root letters say banay ga.
To batayeh kay RasoolAllah kee Bashari'at misliyat meh ham jesi huwi toh kia woh sirf Bashr hen, meh nay bataya kay MSL sirf zahir per bola jata heh is ka talluq Haqiqat say nahin hota, yeh sirf zahir, joh dekhahi deh, us kay leyeh bola jata heh, RasoolAllah kee Bashar'iat hamari Misl heh, Shabih heh, Soorat heh, Libaas heh, Libada heh, jistera Jabraeel alayhis salam kee Bashariat Libaas, Shabih, Libada, Soorat thee, jistera Jibraeel kee zahiri Bashariat per Allah tallah nay un ko Bashr bola ... is'see tera RasoolAllah kee zahiri soorat, per Allah tallah nay un ko Bashariat ka ilaan farmanay ka hokam deeya. Is'see leyeh toh meray Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Barelwi Rahimullah Alayhi Tallah nay Kunz Ul Imaan meh Tafsiri tarjumah yoon keeya:
* Surah Al Kahf {18} Verse 110: "Tum farmaho! Zahir soorat Bashri meh toh meh tum jesa hoon, mujjay wahi aati heh kay tumara ma'bood ek hee heh ..."
RasoolAllah kee Bashariat bee toh Jibraeeli Bashariat thee nah kay nahin?
Baqi meh jab kaam say wapis aaya toh baqi hissay ka jawab doon ga, is leyeh dartay rahen, aur sochtay rahen.
Baqi meh is leyeh dengen maar raha hoon kay joh prh rahay hen woh yeh keh rahay hen:
tum log apni mantaq bazi se baaz nahi aaogay..
* Surah Al Kahf {18} Verse 110: "Tum farmaho! Zahir soorat Bashri meh toh meh tum jesa hoon, mujjay wahi aati heh kay tumara ma'bood ek hee heh ..."
yahi baat isi tarah se Allah ne kion na kehdi kion aesi baat kari jis par ummat larai kare..
turjuma ko turjuma hi rehne dena chahiye..hamare ghar ki kitaab nahi hay jo chahay tehreef kardi..(Zahir soorat Bashri) kis lafz ka turjuma hay..ya apni dimaghi ikhtara hay..Ahmed Raza ne quran mein tehreef ke siwa kia kia hay?
Allah farmate hein ke ye quran seedhi baat karta hay..to khud faisla karo..Allah ne to ye seedhi baat na ki..parho kuch matlab kuch..
aur quran ke alfaaz ma'aniat rekhte hein aik lafz bhi quran mein faltu nahi hay..isko apni dunyawi language aur misalon se tashbie na do..(MISTUKUM) ahmiat rakhta hay quran mein..
-
Aap nay farmaya kay Farishtay apni fitrat kay khilaaf kaam nahin kertay, baee sahib, aap ko kia wahi ahi heh kay Faristhoon kee kia fitrat heh. Mujjay woh Hadith, ayaat pesh keren jis meh Allah tallah nay Farishtay kee fitrat batahi ho. Yeh aap kee sab qiyaas arahi heh kay yeh Farishtay kee fitrat kay khilaaf thah aur heh, inshallah agay dood ka dood aur pani ka pani honay wala heh.
Baee sahib Farishtay Bashr kay roop meh tashreef farma huway, Ibrhaim alayhis salam nay un ko Bashr samaj ker bhoona huwa bachra rakha, Farishtoon nay khaya nahin, aur is nah khanay ko aap nay yoon biyaan farmaya: "magar unho ne khnay se inkaar kar diya ke hum farishtay hein..ye hoti hay fitrat.." Kahan per likha heh kay Farishtoon nay khanay say inqaar keeya, woh tab hota jab Ibrahim kehtay kha'hen Farishtay kehtay ham nahin kha saktay, balkay Farishtoon nay kuch esa nah kaha, jis per aap nay qayas keeya kay khana un kee fitrat kay khilaaf thah.
Jee Farishtay Allah kay hokam kay begher kuch bee nahin kertay, Allah tallah nay farishtoon ko pay'gham denay kay leyeh behja thah, Farishtay ko yeh nahn kaha thah kay agir kohi dawat deh toh kha lena ya nah khana ... Farishtay ko khanay ka hokam nahin thah, jis cheese ka hokam thah ... kay message deliver keren woh unoon nay kia, Allah kee taraf say farishtoon ko khana ka hokam nahin thah unoon nay khana khaya nahin.
Yaad rakhyeh jab zaat badalti heh toh sifaat be badalti hen, dekhyeh, Musa alayhis salam ka A'asaa mubarak, ek lakri ka danda thah na khata thah nah peeta thah, na dekhta thah nah sunta thah, na zinda thah, be'jaan thah ... murda lakri ka bana huwa thah ... magir jab izn e illahi huwa toh mat'ti say bana huwa, jaan daar saamp ban gaya, dekhnay be laga, sunnay be laga, hilnay be laga, aur khana be laga:
Surah 20 Verse 69: "Throw that which is in thy right hand: Quickly will it swallow up that which they have faked what they have faked is but a magician's trick: and the magician thrives not, (no matter) where he goes."
Point yeh heh kay jab zaat badalti heh toh sifaat be badalti hen, sirf zaat nahin badalti. Farishtoon ko khanay kee ijazat nahin thee Allah tallah kee taraf say, agir ijazat hoti toh woh khana be khatay. RasoolAllah Bashr ban ker tashreef farma huway, woh Noor bee thay aur Bashr bee, yehni Noor e Mujjasim, Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah ko ijazat deeh kay khaho peeyo, neend kero, ibadat kero toh RasoolAllah nay kee. Aur yeh note kero, yeh khana peena, khoon behna, Bashariat kee sift heh Noorani'at kee nahin, Noor ko khanay kee zeroorat nahin Bashr ho heh. RasoolAllah nay Khana khaya Bashariat kay wastay, apna khoon bahaya Bashariat kay wastay, ansoon bahahay bashariat kay wastay, .... Jibraeel aur Farishtay agar khata aur peetay toh farq nah perta keyun kay khana peena Bashariat kee sift heh aur jab woh Bashriat kay lebaas meh ahay toh phir Basharoon wali zaat be thee aur sifaat be theen ... Jibraeel itna bara farishta kay asmaan cover ho jahay us kay ek wing say ... magir Bashr ban ker aya toh ziyada say ziyada 7 foot bara huwa hoga qadh meh ... point yeh heh kay jab zaat badalti heh toh zaat kay mutabiq sifaat be badal jaati hen, RasoolAllah Haqiqat meh Noor thay aur Bashariat kay Lebaas meh ba'hasiyat e Noor ban ker ahay. Khana peena rona dona, Bashariat kee sift heh Nooraniat kee nahin, RasoolAllah kee Bashariat kee zeroorat thah khana aur unnoon nay khaya ... aur Jibraeel kee Bashariat kee zeroorat thah yahee khana ... magir khanay kee ijazat bari tallah say nahin thee, agir hoti toh woh khatay be aur peetay be, RasoolAllah ko ijazat thee woh khatay be thay aur peetay be thay, sotay be thay aur rotay be thay ...
Baqi tum yeh keh rahay ho kay Noor khata nahin, toh meh nay kab kaha Noor khata heh, meh keh raha hoon kay Noor ko khana peenay kee zeroorat nahin Bashariat ko heh, aur Farishtay jab Bashr thay toh kha saktay thay, keyun kay khana Bashariat kee zeroorat heh magir keyun kay un ki ijazat nahin thee apni mazi kay mutabiq amal kernay kee Farishtay nah khaa sakkay ... Farishtay sirf wohi kertay hen joh Allah ka hokam hota heh aur us kay ilawah kuch nahin kertay. Nooraniat e rAsoollallah ko kahnay kee zeroorat nahin thee, aur nah Nooraniat e Malaika ko khanay kee zeroorat thee ... Basharit ko zeroorat thee, Farishtoon nay khaya nahin keyun kay ijazat e khuda nahin thee, aur RasoolAllah nay khaya aur sab Bashroon kee tera zindgi guzari keyun kay hidayat e Bashariat kay leyeh ahay thay, aur Amli tareekay say example set keeya taqay baqi Bashr fallow keren, khata dekhen toh khahen, Shaadi kee taqay Ummati be shaadi keren begher keyun kay behtreen tareeka RasoolAllah ka heh aur RasoolAllah nay hidayat farmani thee Ummat kee ...
Aap sifaat e Bashriat ko leh ker, RasoolAllah kee Nooraniat kee nafi kesay ker saktay hen, jahil anparh insaan agar tooh samajta heh kay Noor joh Bashr ban ker ata heh woh khata nahin toh mujjay yeh sabit ker kay yeh kahan say daleel leeh heh. Mera dawa heh kay Farishtay Allah kay hokam kay begher kuch nahin kertay, woh kissi bee roop meh keyun nah hoon. Tooh sabit ker deh kay farishtoon ko apni marzi kernay kee ijazat heh yehni un ko choice heh kay woh khud decide keren toh meh samaj loon ga kay Farishtoon ko choice thee unoon nay khana is leyeh nahin khaya kay Noor joh Bashariat kay lebaas meh ata heh woh khana nahin kha sakta.
Mera dawah heh kay khana Bashariat kee zeroorat heh aur agir Farishtoon ko man;mani kee ijazaat hoti toh woh ba hasiyat e Bashr khana khatay. Mera dawah yeh bee heh jab Zaat badalti heh toh sifaat, be badalti hen, danda jab danda thah toh kuch khata nahin thah jab samp bana toh khata bee thah aur dekhta sunta be thah ... haqiqat meh woh danda hee thah magir jab samp bana toh us kee haqiqat chup gaee aur Samp kay tor per zahir huwa haqiqat meh woh khata kuch nahn thah magir jab woh samp bana toh khanay be laga, isee tera jab Farishtay aur RasoolAllah kee Zaat badali aur ba hasiyat e Bashr ban ker dunya meh ahay aur Nooraniat chup gaee Bashariat meh toh phir un ko khanay peenay kee qudrat milli thee magir ek nay khaya ek nay nahin keyun kay ek ko ijazat thee aur ek ko nahin thee.
Tum mein kitna ilm hay ..ye tumhari guftugo ke andaaz se pata chalta hay..jisko uske ilm ne baat karna nahi sikhaya khali apni barai maarna deengay maarna..is say pata chal raha hay konsa sa ilm hasil kia hay aur kis say hasil kia hay..bas apne muh mian mitthhu banne ka shok hota hay kuch logon ko ..zabardasti apne jahilnana ilm ka sikka bethana chahatay hein..deobandion mein ..wahabion mein tumhari daal nahi gali..tum ne socha yahi aik firqa hay sufion wala ..har ulti seedhi baat par Subhan Allah..Masha Allah..bas tum bralvi ban gaey aur ..in andho mein kaane raja ban gaey..aur ye tumhari wah wah karte hein aur tum khush hotay rehtay ho..chalo Allah tumko aesi aur khusian day..
Aap ke ittilah keay liye arz hay ke ye samjh lo ke MOAJZAY AUR JADOO mein kia farq hay..
jadoo mein jadogar jab kisi cheez ki shakal badal deta hay..to haqeeqat mein wo shakal nahi badalti balkay nazarbandi kar deta hay wo logonki aankh mein..asal mein haqeeqat mein cheez wohi hoti hay..magar nazar kuch aur aati hay..uski misaal yun samjho Moosa
ke saamne wohi jadugar jo thori der pehlay firaon ki azmat ke geet ga rahay thay..magar jab unho ne AZDAHA dekha to wohi log sajde mein gir gaey aur firaon jaysay shakhs ko jawab day diya kay jo kar saktay ho tum sirf is dunya mein..magar ab hum eeman nahi chor saktay..sochne ki baat hay jadugar ko aesi kia cheez nazar aagai..to meray bhai..baat ye thi jadugaron ne jo rassian pheki thi wo dekhne walon ko saanp nazar aarahay thay magar wo haqeeqat mein rassi hi thi..nazar bandi ki gai thi..magar Moosa
ne jo apna ASSA pheka tha wo haqeeqat mein AZDAHA ban giya tha..jis baat ko sirf jadugar hi samjh sakay..jab haqeeqat mein azdaha ban giya to uski fitrat bhi badal gai..
Magar meray jahil dost farishtay jab bhi is dunya mein aain hein bashar ban kar ..unho ne sirf bashar ki shabih ikhtiar ki hoi hoti hay magar wo apni asliat ke lihaz say farishaty hi hotay hein..
Iski misaal ye hay... فَٱتَّخَذَتْ مِن دُونِهِم حِجَاباً فَأَرْسَلْنَآ إِلَيْهَآ رُوحَنَا فَتَمَثَّلَ لَهَا بَشَراً سَوِيّاً
َأَرْسَلْنَآ إِلَيْهَآ } بعد ما فرغت { رُوحَنَا } رسولنا جبريل { فَتَمَثَّلَ لَهَا } فتشبه لها { بَشَراً سَوِيّاً } في صورة شاب لم ينقص { قَالَتْ } مريم { إِنِّيۤ أَعُوذُ } أمتنع { بِٱلرَّحْمَـٰنِ مِنكَ إِن كُنتَ تَقِيّاً } مطيعاً للرحمن ويقال التقي كان اسم رجل سوء فظنت أنه هو ذلك الرجل فمن ذلك تعوذت منه { قَالَ } لها جبريل { إِنَّمَآ أَنَاْ رَسُولُ رَبِّكِ لأَهَبَ لَكِ }
ً
* تفسير تفسير القرآن/ الفيروز آبادي (ت817 هـ) مصنف و مدقق
Is tafseer Ibn Abbas mein Hazrat Ibn Abbas
saaf tor say iski tafseer mein keh rahay hein kay Jibrael
soorat bashri ki sirf TASHBEEH thay unki sirf soorat thi bashar ki..wo koi asli ke bashar nahi ban kar aaey thay..
Agar thori si bhi aqal ho na tum mein to ye baat kafi hay isko samjhne ke liye..mein hargiz tumko qail nahi karna chaha raha hoon..mujhe pata hay tumko aakhir mein phir deengay maarni hay..
Rahi baat Hazrat Ibrahim
ke pass jo farishtay aaey thay....wo bhi bashar ke roop mein farishtay thay..libas bashar ka tha..jis tarah Jibrael
Maryam
ke pass aaey bilkul isi tarah wo farishtay bhi bashar ki shabih mein thay magar haqeeqat mein thay farishtay hi..
TUM MUJHAY YE SABIT KARDO KAY FARISHTAY HAQEEQAT MEIN BASHAR BAN KAR AATAY THAY..mein ne to daleel pesh kardi kay wo shabih ban kar aatay thay haqeeqat mein nahi..QURAN O HADEES SAY..tumhari mantaq nahi..kisi daleel say jo quran o hadees ki ho....
aur tum say aik sawal ye hay ke jis trah se TUMLOGON ne Rasool Allah
ko ma fauq ul bashar aur na jane intahai intahai special qisim ki makhlooq banaya hay..YANI RAB KE BARABAR SIFAAT DAYDI....to sawal ye hay ke Allah Ta'ala ko peghambari ke kaam ke liye is tarah ki personality ki zaroorat kion pari..inki is mafauq ul bashari aur speciality se ummat ko kia faida dayna cha rahay hein Allah ??? kai kisi pure bashar say Allah ka kaam nahi ho sakta tha...???
-
hahahahha
Chishti Qadri bhai ab iski aqal per banda hansay ya roway
oper topic dekhen is ne khud kia rakha hai , aor baten kia kar raha hai . Chotay chotay pieces jama keye howe hein Pervaizi pocket book se .. unko yahan paste ker deta hai ..
oh pervaizi wahabi saab ... ager koi point yahan make kerna hai , tu real book se hadees paste karo , us ki shar'ah ager kisi muhadith ne bayan ki hai tu woh lao, aor us k baad kis kis muhadith ne us hadees ko sahi kaha hai woh lao ....
pervaizi pocket book mein " Aks bukhari Shareef " , " aks musnad e ahmed "
lol .
bechara asal main tazad saabit kerne ki nakam koshish ker raha hai lol .. pervaizi anti hadees
ISKO BOLTAY HEIN LAJAWAB...
JAB JAWAB NAHI TO YE LAO WO LAO........
-
Ilmi yateemi ka ilaaj agir ...
jab aadmi ke pass jawab nahi hota to yumhi keh deta hay ke mein ne radd kar diya..tum kia tumharay baray bhi us post ka jawab nahi day sakte..us mein pakki pakki sahih ahadees say daleel pesh ki gai hay..tumharay sufia ke aqwal wali daleel nahi hay..pehlay puri tarah perh tawajja say ..magar bralviat ka chasma utaar ka parhana phir samjh aega warna yumhi aai baiin karte raho ge apni fazool qabliat ke jhande lehratay raho gay..isko boltay hein apne muh mian mitthho
-
Is say pehlay kay meh aap ko kay sawaloon ka jawab doon meh aap ko Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammat kay aqeedeh ka biyaan ker deta hoon taqay aap kay ilm meh joh gaps hoon woh puray ho jahen. Aur phir aap meray jawabaat ko ba asaani samaj pahen gay.
Allah tallah nay Rasoolallah kay Noor ko sab makhlooq say pehlay peda keeya, phir is Noor ko chand tuqroon meht taqseem keeya aur sab tuqroon say makhlooq banahi, yehni, arsh, Qalm, Lawh, Malaika weghera ... sirf ek woh Noor ka tuqra reh gaya joh Noor e Muhammed sallalahu alayhi was salam thah. Phir Allah tallah nay Noor e Muhammedi sallalahu alayhi was slaam ko Bashariat meh dunya per akhiri Nabi bana ker behja. Jab RasoolAllah Bashr banay toh RasoolAllah ka jism mubarak mat'ti say bana, us meh Allah tallah nay rooh daali, aur phir Noor e Muhammedi is Bashri'at e Muhammedi meh takhal huwa. Har Bashr doh cheesoon say bana heh, Rooh aur Jism, magir RasoolAllah, Jism, Rooh, aur Noor say banay. RasoolAllah kee Noorani'at Rooh aur Jism kee mohtaaj nahin, keyun kay Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah kay Noor ko sab say pehlay banaya, us waqt nah jism thah aur nah Rooh.
Abh aap kay sawalaat kay jawabat.
RasoolAllah dunya meh Noor e Mujassim thay, nah Bashr thay aur nah puray Noor thay, balkay donoon thay, jistera Jibraeel alayhis salam, Noor thay magir Bashr ban ker tashreef lahay:
* Sahih Muslim, Book 40, Hadith 7134: "A'isha reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: The angels were born out of light and the Jinns were born out of the spark of fire and Adam was born as he has been defined (in the Qur'an) for you (i. e. he is fashioned out of clay)."
* Surah Maryam {19} Verse 17: "... then We sent her our angel, and he appeared before her as a man in all respects."
* Sahih Al Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 47: " ... When the shepherds of black camels start boasting and competing with others in the construction of higher buildings. And the Hour is one of five things which nobody knows except Allah. The Prophet then recited: "Verily, with Allah (Alone) is the knowledge of the Hour--." (31. 34) Then that man (Gabriel) left and the Prophet asked his companions to call him back, but they could not see him. Then the Prophet said, "That was Gabriel who came to teach the people their religion." Abu 'Abdullah said: He (the Prophet) considered all that as a part of faith."
Jibraeel Alayhis salam kee Noorani'at chupi thee zahir meh Bashariat thee, Bashari'at haqiqat nahin thee, Bashariat zeroorat kay mutabiq ek roop thah, haqiqat e Jibraeel Bashari'at meh chupi thee, dekhnay walay toh Bashr hee samaj rahay thay ... Maryam alayhis salam nay bee Jibraeel alayhis salam ko Bashr samja, aur RasoolAllah kay Sahabah nay be Jibraeel alayhis salam ko Bashr samja, keyun kay zahir Bashari'at thee, magir Haqiqat yehni Nooraniat Bashariat kay andar chupi thee. Abh ham yeh nahin keh saktay kay Jibraeel sirf Bashr thay, aur yeh bee nahin keh saktay kay woh Noor ban ker ahay, Sayyidi Ala Hazrat nay behtreen ilfaaz bolay Noor e Mujassim, yehni Noor Jism kay adnar, ya Noor Jism kay roop meh ... Abh jab ham Jibraeel alayhis slaam ka Bashr ban ker anay ka zikr keren gay toh Noor e Mujassim bolen gay, keyun kay Noor say un kee haqiqat ka zikr heh aur Mujassim kehnay say joh temporary state, arzi state Jibraeel alayhis slaam nay apnahi thee us ka be zikr ho jata heh.
Aur is'see tera RasoolAllah kee haqiqat bee Noor heh aur woh Mujassim, yehni Bashr ban ker tashreef farma huway. Ham Sunni hen ham RasoolAllah kee Nooraniat ka izhar keren gay aur Bashariat donoon ka, Bashr keh ker Nooraniat kee nafi nahin keren gay, aur Noor keh ker Bashariat kee nafi nahin keren gay, ham Sunni hen puray Quran ko mantay hen is leyeh ham donoon ka izhar keren gay, yehni Noor e Mujjasim. Keyun kay RasoolAllah haqiqat kay lihaaz say Noor hen, aur peda honay kay lihaaz say Bashr, toh ham donoon ka zikr keren gay Noori-Bashr ya Noor e Mujassim, kohi be lafz leh lenh.
Dosra, meh nay kissi be jaga yeh nahin farmaya: "ab ap ne kaha kay jismani toar per noor thay." Meh nay lafz Noor e Mujassim likha heh, aur yeh lafz literal mafoom meh nahin balkay istilah e khaas heh, jistera Taqleed, Marfooh, Maukoof, weghera kee ishtilahat e Khasiya hen. Hadith kay ilm meh Marfooh, Maukoof, ka istilahi mafoom aur heh aur Arabi zubaan meh mafoom aur heh. Meh nay Istilah e Noor e Mujassim, Noori-Bashr kee wazahat ker deeh heh aap perh lenh aur aqeedeh ko shoroon say peren phir samaj meh asaani hogi.
Aap ka dosra point kay Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah kay Bashr honay kee qed lagahi heh. dekhyeh Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah say kesay takhsees kerwahi, tawajoh keren. RasoolAllah kee Bashariat ka zikr heh, magir dekhyeh Allah nay kesay Zikr farmaya:
* Surah Al Kahf {18} Verse 110: "Qull in'nama ana Basharum Misluqum yuha ..."
Lafz "Qull" hukmi heh, yehni farma doh, in'nama kalmah e Hasr heh, yehni takhsees kay leyeh bola jata heh, aur lafz "Sirf" kay mafoom meh bola gaya heh, aur Kalmah e Hasr tafreeq kay leyeh bola jata heh, farq kernay kay leyeh bola jata heh aur yeh qedh lagata heh. Ayaat ka tarjuma heh"
Word for Word Tarjumah: "Kehdo, Sirf meh hoon Bashariat meh tumari misl ..."Coherent Tarjumah: "Kehdo, Meh sirf Bahsariat meh tumari Misla hoon ..."
Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah ko hokam deeya kay farma doh in kaffiroon say kay meh sirf Bashari'at meh tumari jesa hoon, Nabuwat meh, Rehmat meh, Shahid honay meh, Noor honay meh, Siraaj honay meh, Munir honay meh, RasoolAllah honay meh, Nabi honay meh, Khatamun Nabiyeen honay meh tum meri misl nahin, in sab meh, meh be'misl hoon, sirf aur sirf Bashariat meh tum jesa hoon. Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah kee Bashariat kee Misliyat per qedh lagahi heh, kay logo meh sirf Bashariat meh tumari jesa hoon ...
Yeh nah kahen kay Allah tallah nay RasoolAllah kay Bashr honay kee qedh lagahi heh, balkay yeh kahen kay Bashri'at kee Misliyat per qedh lagahi heh: "Meh sirf Bashr honay meh tumari misl hoon." Nooraniat per per kohi qedh nahin.
Aap nay farmaya: agar Noor hain jismani toar per to phir bashar se kia murad lete hain ham...? Baee meh wazahat ker chuka hoon kay RasoolAllah kee Bashariat meh, Jism, Rooh, aur Noor teeno thay ... jistera Jibraeel jab Bashr ban ker ahay toh woh teen jehat rakhtay thay, Jism joh matti say bana, Rooh, aur un kee Nooraniat joh un kee Haqiqat thee ... Is'see tera RasoolAllah be Noor, Jism aur Rooh thay, aur RAsoolAllah kee jab ham Bashariat ka zikr kertay hen toh Rooh aur Jism ka zikr kertay hen yehni Bashariat, jab ham Nooraniat ka Zikr kertay hen toh un kee Haqiqat joh Bashariat meh chupi thee woh muraad hoti heh, aur kabi kabi Hadith say sabit heh kay Nooraniat Basharat per ghalib aati, Hazrat Aysha radiallah ka farmaan heh kay RasoolAllah kay daant mubarak say itni roshini nikalti kay woh gar kay andereh meh itni light ho jaati kay woh needle doond leti.
RasoolAllah kee teen jehateh theen, Noor, Matti say bana jism, aur Rooh, dard, zakham, bhook, khoon behna, weghera yeh Bashariat kee sifaat hen Nooraniat kee nahin, Nooraniat ko toh Knoon bee nahin baha, bhook lagi to Bashariat ko, Nooraniat ka baal bee peeka nah huwa, yaad rakhyeh RasoolAllah kee kee Bashariat majmoo'a heh, Jism + Rooh = Bashariat, aur is Bashariat meh Nooraniat be add huwi toh bana Noor e Mujassim, Noorani'at + Bashariat = Noor e Mujassim {Noori-Bashr} Abh khoon baha , bhook lagi, neend ahahi, daant mubarak shaheed huway, toh yeh sab Bashariat kay huway, Noorani'at meh kuch farq nahin aya.
Dekhyeh meh nay Quran say Jibraeel Alayhis Salam joh Noor thay Bashr ban ker tashreef lahay us kee daleel deeh heh. RasoolAllah kay Noor aur Bashr donoon honay kee daleel:
Surah Al Ahzaab {33} Verse 45" O Prophet! Truly We have sent thee as a Witness, a Bearer of Glad Tidings, and Warner, {46} And as one who invites to Allah.s (grace) by His leave, and as a Siraaj {Lamp} spreading Munir {light}.
Allah subhana wa tallah reffers to Prophet sallalahu alayhi was'salam as Siraj and Muneer, Moon and Sun, this is hint toward Prophets two jehat quality, Chand, is Matti {Bashr} and it absorbs light of Sun and reflects it, where as Sun is Noor and and its own Light. Sun is Noor its entire being is Noor, it radiates Noor, Where as Moon is made from clay, soil, it doesnt have its own light but takes light from sun and reflects it ... and I have already quoted Hadith in which Prophets teeth mubarak radiated Noor, reflected the Noor which was co-existing with Bashariat. Allah reffers to Prophet sallalahu alayhi was salam as Siraaj Moon {Bashr} as well as Muneer {Noor} hinting that Prophet has two realities ...
Another verse of Quran which also hints at two realities of Prophet sallalahu alayhi was'salam.
* Surah Al Isra {17}: "Say, "If there were settled, on earth, angels walking about in peace and quiet, We should certainly have sent them down from the heavens an angel for an apostle."
Ayaat ka nachor yeh heh kay dunya meh jesi Makhlooq hogi wesa Rasool behja jahay ga un kee taraf. Jibraeel alayhis salam ka RasoolAllah kee taraf Wahi leh ker ana daleel heh kay RasoolAllah kee ek jehat Noor kee heh, agir Noor nah ho toh mazallah astaghfirullah Allah tallah kay kalam meh tazaad peda hota heh. RasoolAllah kay pass Jibraeel alayhis salam, ek Noori makhlooq ka wahi leh ker ana daleel heh kay RasoolAllah kee ek jehat Noor thee, aur phir RasoolAllah ka is Wahi ko Sahabah taq punchana is baat kee daleel heh kay RasoolAllah kee dosri jehat Bashariat thee. RasoolAllah kee Noorani'at aur Bashariat kee donoon jehtoon ko mana jahay toh phir kalam e bari tallah meh tazaad shaq nahin hota ... keyun kay Jibraeel Noor thay, aur Sahabah Bashr thay aur Allah nay farmaya heh kay agir farishtay hotay toh farishtay Rasool hotay, yehni jesi makhlooq wesa Rasool, abh RasoolAllah kay pass Jibraeel Rasool ban ker ahay toh phir RasoolAllah ka Noor hona lazam heh, aur RasoolAllah ka Bashr hona Sahabah kay leyeh lazam heh.
Aap kay saray points ka jawab likh deeya heh.
Meri taraf say guzarish heh kay aap debates nah keren pehlay apnay aqahid ko achi tera seekhen phir debates keren warna apnay aap ko musibat aur sar dardi meh mat dalen.
Mazeed agir kohi help kee zeroorat huwi toh khadim ko message kee jeeyeh ga.
Muhammed Ali Razvi
Aap ne jitni bhi mislein dein hein ke Farishtay bashar ke roop mein aatay thay..isi baat ko bunyad bana kar aap logon ko bewaqoof bana rahay hein ke dekho wo bhi to 2 roop mein thay isi tarah Rasool Allah
ke bhi 2 roop hein..
magar mere bhai farishtay waqt e zaroorat bashar ke roop mein aaey zaroor hein magar unho ne kabhi wo kaam nahi kia jo bashar ke taqazay hotay hein..kionke ye unki fitrat ke khilaf tha..
iski chooti si misaal ke Ibrahim
ke pass farishtay bashar ke roop mein aaey aur Ibrahim
ne unke liye foran bhuna howa bachra pesh kia..magar unho ne khnay se inkaar kar diya ke hum farishtay hein..ye hoti hay fitrat..
magar Rasool Allah
ne har wo kaam kiya jo aik bashar ke taqazay hote hein..unho ne shadi ki..bachay peda hoay..khana khatay thay..pani peetay thay..bazaron mein chaltay phirtay thay..unke jisim se aam aadmion tarah khoon nikalta tha..pkhana peshab karte thay..istinja karte thay..chotein khai..zakham khaey..gharz beshumar koi cheez aesi na thi jo unho ne na ki..karte kion nahi ..yahi unki fitrat thi..agar wo koi noorani aur ma fauqal bashar hotay to kabhi ye kaam na karte..jis tarah Ibrahim
ke pass ana wale farishto ne na ki..aur jis kaam ke liye unko duya mein allah ne bheja ...uskay liye to phir kisi pure bashar ko bhi allah ta'ala nabi bana kar bhej detye...kion itni sifaat wala ..Allah ki qualities wala peghamber bheja ..kia iski koiwaja thi..magar kufaar hamesha yahi kehtay thay..tum to aik bashar ho aur tumhari to hum koi fazilat nahi dekhte ..jo kuch tum bayan karte ho kia kuffar ko nahi nazar i ye siffat ..to wo kion peghamber aam aadmi bolte thay...
zara hosh karo..Allah se hidayat maango..asal mein tum log quarn o hadees ko parhtay hi apne akabir ka chasma lagakr ...
-
Hadith e Qudsi heh Allah farmata heh: "Meh pahoon ban jata hoon jis say woh chalta heh." Yahan per literaly Allah pahoon nahin banta sirf wahabiyoon ka khuda shahid banta ho, Musalmanoon ka pahoon nahin banta is hadith meh mafoom majaazi heh, yehni Allah tallah apnay muqarrib ko buland darja ata kerta heh kay us kay leyeh door qareeb jana kohi mushkil nahin rehta ... jitera ek malik ul maut heh, Allah nay ussay qudrat deeh dunya meh hazaroon kee jaan leta heh ek hee second meh ... Allah qudrat deta heh apnay Nabiyoon ko aur Waliyoon ko ...
Aap ka yeh ihtiraaz jahalat heh, is say rad nahin balkay Musa alayhis salam kee shaan sabit hoti heh kay woh namaz perh rahay thay aur phir Bayt Ul Maqdis meh thay ... yeh shaan sabit huwi Musa alayhis salam kee Hayaat e Ambiyah per nuqs kistera huwa.
Hayaat e Ambiyah sabit ho chuki heh abh aap kay pass nah kohi daleel sirf taqreeren reh gahi hen.
zabardasti ka to koi ilaaj nahi hay..baat ye hay ke pehlay aap ke toheedi bhai bohot israar kar rahay thay is daleel par ke Moosa
qabar mein namaz parh rahay thay..isi tarah wo aur doosre bohot se anbiya bait ul maqdas mein namaz parh rahay thay us raat..to jab aap qabar mein moosa
ko is daleel ki bunyad par zinda maan rahay ho to saray anbiya ko bait ul maqdas mein bhi zinda mano..un sabko wahan par dekha tha..
baat ye hay ke mairaaj ka waqiya pura ka pura mujza hay..aur mujza aqal se mawara hota hay..is liye mujze ki kisi baat ko aam zindagi ke liye daleel nahi banaya ja sakta..
Asal qabristan barsakh mein hay..ye nahi jo aap samjh rahay hein chahay wo anbiya hoon ya aam aadmi..marne ke baad khatam is duya ka connection.. meri ye post parh lijye ga
-
-
Toheedi baee, meh aap kay sawaal ka jawab deh deta hoon agir ghalti ho gaee toh mar lee jeeyeh ga: Rooh aur Jism donoon ka namaz perna heh, Jism rooh kay begher perh nahin sakta aur jism rooh kay beghair, donoon ek dosray kee mohtaaj hen, sabit ho gaya kay Musa alayhis salam nay Jism aur Rooh donoon kay saath namaz peri, aur woh ba'hayat thay:
* Sahih Al MuslimBook 030: Kitab Al Fazahil, Hadith Number 5859: "Anas reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: I happened to pass by Moses as he was busy in saying prayer in his grave, and in the hadith transmitted on the authority of 'Isa there is an addition of these words:, I happened to pass on the occasion of the Night journey." In the hadith pertaining to ..."
Toheedi baee aap kee Hadith Musnab e Abu Yala kee taheed meh, Sahih Muslim kee hadith pesh e khidmat heh. Chor kitni dafa machahay ga shor.
Radiatiing sahab aap ke toheedi bhai ke mutabiq muslim ki hadees mein hay hadees ke moosa
ko Rasool Allah
ne qabar mein namaz parhate hoe dekha..aap logon ka to kaam ho gia mil gai bhie daleel qabar ki zindagi ki..bohot israar kar rahay hein toheedi bhai jisim hay ke rooh he batao na kon namaz parhata hay..toheedi sahab ka israar bohot barh raha hay...
to mere bhai agar aap is qabar wali hadees se qabar mein moosa
ki zindagi sabit kar rahay ho to usi Sahih Muslim ki aik aur riwayat hay....is mein to ye bhi likha hay ke jab mein bait ul maqdas pohoncha to wahan Ibrahim
Essa
And Wohi Moosa
jinko abhi thori der pehlay qabar mein namaz parhata chor kar aaey thay ab wo bait ul maqdas mein namaz parh rahay hein..
To mere radiating bhai aur toheedi bhai aap log aakhir kion bazid hein ke Moosa
qabar mein zinda hein..is riwayat ko pakar kar..to bhaionye Anbiya
to bait ul maqdas mein bhi namaz parh rahay thay wahan unki zindagi kion sabit nahi karte..Essa
to aasman par zinda hein ..magar is riwayat se aap logonke ke dimaagh ke mutabiq unko bait ul maqdas mein zinda mano..kionke inko bhi dekha tha aur Ibrahim
ko bhi dekha tha..balkay is zabardast mantaq se to saray Anbiya
ko bait ul maqdas mein zinda manna parega..magar qabar parasto ka kaam to aik hi hadees se chal giya becharon ko doosri riwayat nazar hi na i...hai bralvi tum logon ki aqal par matam ke siwa kia kia ja sakta hay..
wo riwayat mulahiza karein
(4) It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: I found myself in Hijr and the Quraish were asking me about my might journey. I was asked about things pertaining to Bait-ul-Maqdis which I could not preserve (in my mind). I was very much vexed, so vexed as I had never been before. Then Allah raised it (Bait-ul-Maqdis) before my eyes. I looked towards it, and I gave them the information about whatever they questioned me I also saw myself among the group of apostles. I saw moses saying prayer and found him to be a well-built man as if he was a man of the tribe of Shanu'a. I saw Jesus son of Mary (peace be upon him) offering prayer, of all of men he had the closest resemblance with 'Urwa b. Masu'd al-Thaqafi. I saw Ibrahim (peace be upon him) offering prayer; he had the closest resemblance with your companion (the Prophet himself) amongst people. When the time of prayer came I led them. When I completed the prayer, someone said: Here is Malik, the keeper of the Hell; pay him salutations. I turned to him, but he preceded me in salutation. (Book #001, Hadith #0328)
-
Aray ajhal tumhara damagh kyon chakra raha hay is inident ko explain karnay k baray main???Main kab say keh raha hon is ko explain karo thora sa laikan tum ho keh samjany ka naam he nahi lay rahay.Hadees Sharif tu chalo par le,laikan is k peechay koi aisi bat b tu ho ge na?????
O wahhabi sb.tum Mun Kntu Mola wali Hadees Sharif ke haqeeqat ko zahar karnay walay thay aur topic ko dosri taraf lay gay.Hay na tumhari bay basi ke had
tum logon mein agar aqal hoti to ye mushriko wala kaslak ikhtiar na karte...
saaf saaf hadees dikha raha hoon..musnad ahmed ki ke Rasool Allah
Hazrat Ali ko apne baad khlifa nominate kar rahay hein..jahil itni si baat samjh nahi aati ....isi baat ka to jawab maang raha hoon..kai ye riwayat sahi hay..isi baat mein tumhari tamaam baton ka jawab hay..aqal choti hay balke hay hi nahi..tumhara qusoor nahi hay..jo baron ne sikha diya bas wohi sahih hay..
-
Kamal kar diya hay aap nain janab e aali.Hadees Sharif main tu kisi aisi bat ka zikar tak nahi kia gya.Kis jagah Nijran ka name aaya hay is Hadees Sharif main????Zara us ko highlight tu karo janab????
Aap nain tu had he kar de hay.Topic ka name kuch aur neechay kuch...Tumhari bay basi par hansi aa rahy hay mujay...
mein sahi to kehta hoon ke tum log doosron ki baat ko nahi sunte sirf apna gana gate ho...post ke end mein arabic ibarat likhi hay musnad ahmed ke hawale say ...jahillllll
-
Ghadir e Qum (or Qhum)
- فورم: فتنہ شیعہ
Azad Umeedwar sahab bare adab se aik baat poochna chahata hoon..sirf apni maaloomat ke liye..
karbala ka waqiya aik qayamat se kam nahi tha..ajab nafsa nafsi ka alam tha..har aankh ro rahi thi..zulm ki intaha ho rahi thi..
poochna ye hay kay ..itni bari pareshani ke aalam mein bhi kon tha jo itni detail se wo sari karawai word to word likh raha tha..jis tarah aap logonki majlis mein bayan ki jati hay..
-
@ tohidee
janab aap ko is ka jawab mai nay asaar e sihaba say day to diya hai? aur muhaddiseen say bhi diya?
ab aap na manien to hamara kya kasoor hai.?
siyasat na chalaien aur HAQ ko qabool karien.
@ saeedi
janab aap kay sawalaat kay jawabaat mai day chuka hun. jo aap nay sab say pehlay poochay the. un sawalaat mai hee aap kay aqeeday ko teses nehes kiya tha aap nay khud.
ab aap sirf time zaia kar kay sawalaat par sawalaat kar rahey hain. wwarna HAQ to wazeh kar diya gya hai.
ALLAH U AKBAR
YA ALLAH MADAD
Meray khyal se toheedi sahab school teacher hein sawal bohot karte hein..jawab bhi daydo phir bhi wohi sawal karte hein..inka kaam sirf aik hay logonko ko masle mein uljhana usko becheeda banana..seedhi saadhi baat ko tool dena..
-
Hay na jahilon wala kaam.Really kisi nain theek he kaha hay keh jahliat wahhabion aur deobandion ko wirsay main mili hay.Jab kisi incident ka pata he nahi ho ga keh real incident kia hay tu us ka koi kya jawab day????
Wahhabi nain mun uthaya aur aik sentence likh dia like in exams true and false come......Had kar de tum nain,main kab say keh raha hon keh tum is ko thora sa briefly explain tu karo asal waqia kya hay.Tab ja kar koi reply day ga na.....
Waiting for your reply....
-
Jazak Allah o Khairan Kaseera Salar Raza bhai
Bhai jan is faqeer nain Quran e Pak ke Tafaseer say b yeh sabat kia hay keh Humaray Nabi e Kareem
Noor hain.Laikan in sab nain bashar bashar ke rat lagay hui hay jis ka hum nain kabhi inkar he nahi kia.Itni Tafaseer k hawalay diya hain laikan un ka jawab abhi tak nahi aaya.Itnay sawal kia laiakan jawab nadarad.
Ab kya karain hum in jahilon ka
aap ne tafseer se sabit kia kay Rasool Allah
noor thay lekin wo kon se noor thay...
HIDAYAT KE NOOR THAY..YA JISMANI NOOR THAY YE TO BATAO NA..TUMHARI TAFSEER YE KAHIN NAHI LIKHA HAY
MAGAR MEIN TUMKO TAFSEER SAY SABIT KAR SAKTA HOON KE IS AYAT MEIN UNKO HIDAYAT KA NOOR KAHA GIYA HAY..
Marnay k baad b shirk nahi chora.
- فورم: مناظرہ اور ردِ بدمذہب
مراسلہ: · Edited by Ya Allah Madad
Bhai Salar sahab..Hamare pyare Nabi
wo peghamber hein jinho ne apni ummat ko Bait ul khalah jane se laykar Baitullah ke tawaf tak ka tareeka batay hay..zindagi ka koi shoba unho ne nahi chora jis mein unki ummat yahan wahan dekhay ..Peda hone se marne tak aik aik lamha kayse guzarna hay..kon sa kaam kaysay karna hay..humko bata gaey wo..
Ab tum log jo murde ke sath uske marne ke baad ye jo bhi harktein kar rahay ho..mujhay ye batao Allah ke Rasool
aik musalman ke marne ke baad is kaam mein rehnumai karna bhool gaey thay kia..agar unho ne ye kaam kia ya karne bola to uska suboot quran o sunnat e sahaba se sabit karoo..warna ye tasleem karo ke Rasool
ye ahad nama aur shajra wali baat batana bhool gaey thay ..hum usko kar rahay hein..
The best word is the Word of Allah [the Qur'an], and the best guidance is the guidance of Muhammad
. (Ibn Majah)